Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study

Abstract Background Although osteoporosis is an easily diagnosed and treatable condition, many individuals remain untreated. Clinical decision support systems might increase appropriate treatment of osteoporosis. We designed the Osteoporosis Advisor (OPAD), a computerized tool to support physicians...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Main Authors: Haukur T. Gudmundsson, Karen E. Hansen, Bjarni V. Halldorsson, Bjorn R. Ludviksson, Bjorn Gudbjornsson
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0749-4
https://doaj.org/article/a86d479b04b94aa18489a55d900c2b80
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:a86d479b04b94aa18489a55d900c2b80
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:a86d479b04b94aa18489a55d900c2b80 2023-05-15T16:51:37+02:00 Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study Haukur T. Gudmundsson Karen E. Hansen Bjarni V. Halldorsson Bjorn R. Ludviksson Bjorn Gudbjornsson 2019-02-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0749-4 https://doaj.org/article/a86d479b04b94aa18489a55d900c2b80 EN eng BMC http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-019-0749-4 https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6947 doi:10.1186/s12911-019-0749-4 1472-6947 https://doaj.org/article/a86d479b04b94aa18489a55d900c2b80 BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2019) Clinical decision support system (CDSS) Clinical guidelines Fracture risk Osteoporosis Treatment recommendations Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics R858-859.7 article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0749-4 2022-12-30T21:11:56Z Abstract Background Although osteoporosis is an easily diagnosed and treatable condition, many individuals remain untreated. Clinical decision support systems might increase appropriate treatment of osteoporosis. We designed the Osteoporosis Advisor (OPAD), a computerized tool to support physicians managing osteoporosis at the point-of-care. The present study compares the treatment recommendations provided by OPAD, an expert physician and the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG). Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 259 patients attending the outpatient osteoporosis clinic at the University Hospital in Iceland. We entered each patient’s data into the OPAD and recorded the OPAD diagnostic comments, 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture and treatment options. We compared OPAD recommendations to those given by the osteoporosis specialist, and to those of the NOGG. Results Risk estimates made by OPAD were highly correlated with those from FRAX (r = 0.99, 95% CI 0.99, 1.00 without femoral neck BMD; r = 0.98, 95% CI, 0.97, 0.99 with femoral neck BMD. Reassurance was recommended by the expert, NOGG and the OPAD in 68, 63 and 52% of cases, respectively. Likewise, intervention was recommended by the expert, NOGG, and the OPAD in 32, 37 and 48% of cases, respectively. The OPAD demonstrated moderate agreement with the physician (kappa 0.51, 95% CI 0.41, 0.61) and even higher agreement with NOGG (kappa 0.69, 95% CI 0.60, 0.77). Conclusion Primary care physicians can use the OPAD to assess and treat patients’ skeletal health. Recommendations given by OPAD are consistent with expert opinion and existing guidelines. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 19 1
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Clinical decision support system (CDSS)
Clinical guidelines
Fracture risk
Osteoporosis
Treatment recommendations
Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics
R858-859.7
spellingShingle Clinical decision support system (CDSS)
Clinical guidelines
Fracture risk
Osteoporosis
Treatment recommendations
Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics
R858-859.7
Haukur T. Gudmundsson
Karen E. Hansen
Bjarni V. Halldorsson
Bjorn R. Ludviksson
Bjorn Gudbjornsson
Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study
topic_facet Clinical decision support system (CDSS)
Clinical guidelines
Fracture risk
Osteoporosis
Treatment recommendations
Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics
R858-859.7
description Abstract Background Although osteoporosis is an easily diagnosed and treatable condition, many individuals remain untreated. Clinical decision support systems might increase appropriate treatment of osteoporosis. We designed the Osteoporosis Advisor (OPAD), a computerized tool to support physicians managing osteoporosis at the point-of-care. The present study compares the treatment recommendations provided by OPAD, an expert physician and the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG). Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 259 patients attending the outpatient osteoporosis clinic at the University Hospital in Iceland. We entered each patient’s data into the OPAD and recorded the OPAD diagnostic comments, 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture and treatment options. We compared OPAD recommendations to those given by the osteoporosis specialist, and to those of the NOGG. Results Risk estimates made by OPAD were highly correlated with those from FRAX (r = 0.99, 95% CI 0.99, 1.00 without femoral neck BMD; r = 0.98, 95% CI, 0.97, 0.99 with femoral neck BMD. Reassurance was recommended by the expert, NOGG and the OPAD in 68, 63 and 52% of cases, respectively. Likewise, intervention was recommended by the expert, NOGG, and the OPAD in 32, 37 and 48% of cases, respectively. The OPAD demonstrated moderate agreement with the physician (kappa 0.51, 95% CI 0.41, 0.61) and even higher agreement with NOGG (kappa 0.69, 95% CI 0.60, 0.77). Conclusion Primary care physicians can use the OPAD to assess and treat patients’ skeletal health. Recommendations given by OPAD are consistent with expert opinion and existing guidelines.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Haukur T. Gudmundsson
Karen E. Hansen
Bjarni V. Halldorsson
Bjorn R. Ludviksson
Bjorn Gudbjornsson
author_facet Haukur T. Gudmundsson
Karen E. Hansen
Bjarni V. Halldorsson
Bjorn R. Ludviksson
Bjorn Gudbjornsson
author_sort Haukur T. Gudmundsson
title Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study
title_short Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study
title_full Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study
title_fullStr Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study
title_sort clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to nogg guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study
publisher BMC
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0749-4
https://doaj.org/article/a86d479b04b94aa18489a55d900c2b80
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2019)
op_relation http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-019-0749-4
https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6947
doi:10.1186/s12911-019-0749-4
1472-6947
https://doaj.org/article/a86d479b04b94aa18489a55d900c2b80
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0749-4
container_title BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
container_volume 19
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766041733647302656