A new interpretation for the origin of the Norilsk type PGE–Cu–Ni sulfide deposits

The origin of PGE–Cu–Ni sulfide deposits of Norilsk and Talnakh located in the northwest flank of the Triassic basalt trap formation of Siberia is considered. It is shown that ore elements of these deposits (probably, except Fe) are derived from the crust rather than from the mantle. They entered th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geoscience Frontiers
Main Authors: V.I. Starostin, O.G. Sorokhtin
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2011.09.005
https://doaj.org/article/a5a1a15cd0c84633a94d0fcc40931af4
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:a5a1a15cd0c84633a94d0fcc40931af4
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:a5a1a15cd0c84633a94d0fcc40931af4 2023-10-09T21:53:44+02:00 A new interpretation for the origin of the Norilsk type PGE–Cu–Ni sulfide deposits V.I. Starostin O.G. Sorokhtin 2011-10-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2011.09.005 https://doaj.org/article/a5a1a15cd0c84633a94d0fcc40931af4 EN eng Elsevier http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987111000880 https://doaj.org/toc/1674-9871 1674-9871 doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2011.09.005 https://doaj.org/article/a5a1a15cd0c84633a94d0fcc40931af4 Geoscience Frontiers, Vol 2, Iss 4, Pp 583-591 (2011) PGE–Cu–Ni sulfide deposits Siberian traps Paleoproterozoic Recycling of ore elements Geology QE1-996.5 article 2011 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2011.09.005 2023-09-10T00:49:46Z The origin of PGE–Cu–Ni sulfide deposits of Norilsk and Talnakh located in the northwest flank of the Triassic basalt trap formation of Siberia is considered. It is shown that ore elements of these deposits (probably, except Fe) are derived from the crust rather than from the mantle. They entered the basalts owing to a remobilization (recycling) of ore elements from the Paleoproterozoic sediments and from the rocks of the Siberian platform’s basement. Prospecting criteria for similar deposits are as follows: (1) a presence of a large Paleoproterozoic aulacogen and a related magmatic sulfide Cu–Ni mineralization; (2) a confinement of perspective areas to troughs associated with long-lived deep fault zones; (3) association with mobile orogenic belts, island-arc systems and tectonomagmatic activation zones; (4) temporal association with boundaries of global periods characterized by active processes of continental breakup and large-scale trap magmatism. A combination of several factors (the first one is obligatory) is favorable for the discovery of a large ore body. Article in Journal/Newspaper norilsk Siberia Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Norilsk ENVELOPE(88.203,88.203,69.354,69.354) Talnakh ENVELOPE(88.205,88.205,69.470,69.470) Geoscience Frontiers 2 4 583 591
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic PGE–Cu–Ni sulfide deposits
Siberian traps
Paleoproterozoic
Recycling of ore elements
Geology
QE1-996.5
spellingShingle PGE–Cu–Ni sulfide deposits
Siberian traps
Paleoproterozoic
Recycling of ore elements
Geology
QE1-996.5
V.I. Starostin
O.G. Sorokhtin
A new interpretation for the origin of the Norilsk type PGE–Cu–Ni sulfide deposits
topic_facet PGE–Cu–Ni sulfide deposits
Siberian traps
Paleoproterozoic
Recycling of ore elements
Geology
QE1-996.5
description The origin of PGE–Cu–Ni sulfide deposits of Norilsk and Talnakh located in the northwest flank of the Triassic basalt trap formation of Siberia is considered. It is shown that ore elements of these deposits (probably, except Fe) are derived from the crust rather than from the mantle. They entered the basalts owing to a remobilization (recycling) of ore elements from the Paleoproterozoic sediments and from the rocks of the Siberian platform’s basement. Prospecting criteria for similar deposits are as follows: (1) a presence of a large Paleoproterozoic aulacogen and a related magmatic sulfide Cu–Ni mineralization; (2) a confinement of perspective areas to troughs associated with long-lived deep fault zones; (3) association with mobile orogenic belts, island-arc systems and tectonomagmatic activation zones; (4) temporal association with boundaries of global periods characterized by active processes of continental breakup and large-scale trap magmatism. A combination of several factors (the first one is obligatory) is favorable for the discovery of a large ore body.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author V.I. Starostin
O.G. Sorokhtin
author_facet V.I. Starostin
O.G. Sorokhtin
author_sort V.I. Starostin
title A new interpretation for the origin of the Norilsk type PGE–Cu–Ni sulfide deposits
title_short A new interpretation for the origin of the Norilsk type PGE–Cu–Ni sulfide deposits
title_full A new interpretation for the origin of the Norilsk type PGE–Cu–Ni sulfide deposits
title_fullStr A new interpretation for the origin of the Norilsk type PGE–Cu–Ni sulfide deposits
title_full_unstemmed A new interpretation for the origin of the Norilsk type PGE–Cu–Ni sulfide deposits
title_sort new interpretation for the origin of the norilsk type pge–cu–ni sulfide deposits
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2011
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2011.09.005
https://doaj.org/article/a5a1a15cd0c84633a94d0fcc40931af4
long_lat ENVELOPE(88.203,88.203,69.354,69.354)
ENVELOPE(88.205,88.205,69.470,69.470)
geographic Norilsk
Talnakh
geographic_facet Norilsk
Talnakh
genre norilsk
Siberia
genre_facet norilsk
Siberia
op_source Geoscience Frontiers, Vol 2, Iss 4, Pp 583-591 (2011)
op_relation http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987111000880
https://doaj.org/toc/1674-9871
1674-9871
doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2011.09.005
https://doaj.org/article/a5a1a15cd0c84633a94d0fcc40931af4
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2011.09.005
container_title Geoscience Frontiers
container_volume 2
container_issue 4
container_start_page 583
op_container_end_page 591
_version_ 1779317045250228224