Genetic and morphological divergence in the warm-water planktonic foraminifera genus Globigerinoides.

The planktonic foraminifera genus Globigerinoides provides a prime example of a species-rich genus in which genetic and morphological divergence are uncorrelated. To shed light on the evolutionary processes that lead to the present-day diversity of Globigerinoides, we investigated the genetic, ecolo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLOS ONE
Main Authors: Raphaël Morard, Angelina Füllberg, Geert-Jan A Brummer, Mattia Greco, Lukas Jonkers, André Wizemann, Agnes K M Weiner, Kate Darling, Michael Siccha, Ronan Ledevin, Hiroshi Kitazato, Thibault de Garidel-Thoron, Colomban de Vargas, Michal Kucera
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019
Subjects:
R
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225246
https://doaj.org/article/a4f45c4c99364ecd9f44c5ee64628175
Description
Summary:The planktonic foraminifera genus Globigerinoides provides a prime example of a species-rich genus in which genetic and morphological divergence are uncorrelated. To shed light on the evolutionary processes that lead to the present-day diversity of Globigerinoides, we investigated the genetic, ecological and morphological divergence of its constituent species. We assembled a global collection of single-cell barcode sequences and show that the genus consists of eight distinct genetic types organized in five extant morphospecies. Based on morphological evidence, we reassign the species Globoturborotalita tenella to Globigerinoides and amend Globigerinoides ruber by formally proposing two new subspecies, G. ruber albus n.subsp. and G. ruber ruber in order to express their subspecies level distinction and to replace the informal G. ruber "white" and G. ruber "pink", respectively. The genetic types within G. ruber and Globigerinoides elongatus show a combination of endemism and coexistence, with little evidence for ecological differentiation. CT-scanning and ontogeny analysis reveal that the diagnostic differences in adult morphologies could be explained by alterations of the ontogenetic trajectories towards final (reproductive) size. This indicates that heterochrony may have caused the observed decoupling between genetic and morphological diversification within the genus. We find little evidence for environmental forcing of either the genetic or the morphological diversification, which allude to biotic interactions such as symbiosis, as the driver of speciation in Globigerinoides.