Ice discharge error estimates using different cross-sectional area approaches: a case study for the Canadian High Arctic, 2016/17
We analyse the various error sources in the estimation of ice discharge through flux gates, distinguishing the cases with ice-thickness data available for glacier cross-sections or only along the centreline. For the latter, we analyse the performance of three U-shaped cross-sectional approaches. We...
Published in: | Journal of Glaciology |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.48 https://doaj.org/article/a429c7df010a455eb677fea65e49ccb9 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:a429c7df010a455eb677fea65e49ccb9 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:a429c7df010a455eb677fea65e49ccb9 2023-05-15T14:54:10+02:00 Ice discharge error estimates using different cross-sectional area approaches: a case study for the Canadian High Arctic, 2016/17 PABLO SÁNCHEZ-GÁMEZ FRANCISCO J. NAVARRO 2018-08-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.48 https://doaj.org/article/a429c7df010a455eb677fea65e49ccb9 EN eng Cambridge University Press https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143018000485/type/journal_article https://doaj.org/toc/0022-1430 https://doaj.org/toc/1727-5652 doi:10.1017/jog.2018.48 0022-1430 1727-5652 https://doaj.org/article/a429c7df010a455eb677fea65e49ccb9 Journal of Glaciology, Vol 64, Pp 595-608 (2018) Arctic glaciology glacier discharge ice dynamics remote sensing Environmental sciences GE1-350 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.48 2023-03-12T01:30:59Z We analyse the various error sources in the estimation of ice discharge through flux gates, distinguishing the cases with ice-thickness data available for glacier cross-sections or only along the centreline. For the latter, we analyse the performance of three U-shaped cross-sectional approaches. We apply this methodology to glaciers of the Canadian High Arctic. The velocity field is the main error source for small and medium-size glaciers (discharge <100 Mt a−1) with low velocities (<100 m a−1), while for large glaciers (discharge >100 Mt a−1) with high velocities (>100 m a−1) the error in cross-sectional area dominates. Thinning/thickening between ice-thickness and velocity measurements should be considered, as it implies systematic errors up to 8% in our study. The U-shaped parabolic approach, which allows for an adjusted estimation when the ice-thickness measurement point is displaced from the glacier centreline, performs best, with small bias and admissible standard error. We observe an increase of ice discharge from the main glaciers (Trinity and Wykeham) of the Prince of Wales Icefield from 2015 to 2016, by 5 and 20%, respectively, followed by a decrease in 2017, by 10 and 15%, respectively. Belcher Glacier, of the Devon Ice Cap, maintains similar discharges during 2015–17. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Ice cap Journal of Glaciology Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Belcher ENVELOPE(-94.172,-94.172,57.936,57.936) Belcher Glacier ENVELOPE(-81.354,-81.354,75.682,75.682) Devon Ice Cap ENVELOPE(-82.499,-82.499,75.335,75.335) Prince of Wales Icefield ENVELOPE(-78.998,-78.998,78.252,78.252) Journal of Glaciology 64 246 595 608 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
Arctic glaciology glacier discharge ice dynamics remote sensing Environmental sciences GE1-350 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 |
spellingShingle |
Arctic glaciology glacier discharge ice dynamics remote sensing Environmental sciences GE1-350 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 PABLO SÁNCHEZ-GÁMEZ FRANCISCO J. NAVARRO Ice discharge error estimates using different cross-sectional area approaches: a case study for the Canadian High Arctic, 2016/17 |
topic_facet |
Arctic glaciology glacier discharge ice dynamics remote sensing Environmental sciences GE1-350 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 |
description |
We analyse the various error sources in the estimation of ice discharge through flux gates, distinguishing the cases with ice-thickness data available for glacier cross-sections or only along the centreline. For the latter, we analyse the performance of three U-shaped cross-sectional approaches. We apply this methodology to glaciers of the Canadian High Arctic. The velocity field is the main error source for small and medium-size glaciers (discharge <100 Mt a−1) with low velocities (<100 m a−1), while for large glaciers (discharge >100 Mt a−1) with high velocities (>100 m a−1) the error in cross-sectional area dominates. Thinning/thickening between ice-thickness and velocity measurements should be considered, as it implies systematic errors up to 8% in our study. The U-shaped parabolic approach, which allows for an adjusted estimation when the ice-thickness measurement point is displaced from the glacier centreline, performs best, with small bias and admissible standard error. We observe an increase of ice discharge from the main glaciers (Trinity and Wykeham) of the Prince of Wales Icefield from 2015 to 2016, by 5 and 20%, respectively, followed by a decrease in 2017, by 10 and 15%, respectively. Belcher Glacier, of the Devon Ice Cap, maintains similar discharges during 2015–17. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
PABLO SÁNCHEZ-GÁMEZ FRANCISCO J. NAVARRO |
author_facet |
PABLO SÁNCHEZ-GÁMEZ FRANCISCO J. NAVARRO |
author_sort |
PABLO SÁNCHEZ-GÁMEZ |
title |
Ice discharge error estimates using different cross-sectional area approaches: a case study for the Canadian High Arctic, 2016/17 |
title_short |
Ice discharge error estimates using different cross-sectional area approaches: a case study for the Canadian High Arctic, 2016/17 |
title_full |
Ice discharge error estimates using different cross-sectional area approaches: a case study for the Canadian High Arctic, 2016/17 |
title_fullStr |
Ice discharge error estimates using different cross-sectional area approaches: a case study for the Canadian High Arctic, 2016/17 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ice discharge error estimates using different cross-sectional area approaches: a case study for the Canadian High Arctic, 2016/17 |
title_sort |
ice discharge error estimates using different cross-sectional area approaches: a case study for the canadian high arctic, 2016/17 |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.48 https://doaj.org/article/a429c7df010a455eb677fea65e49ccb9 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-94.172,-94.172,57.936,57.936) ENVELOPE(-81.354,-81.354,75.682,75.682) ENVELOPE(-82.499,-82.499,75.335,75.335) ENVELOPE(-78.998,-78.998,78.252,78.252) |
geographic |
Arctic Belcher Belcher Glacier Devon Ice Cap Prince of Wales Icefield |
geographic_facet |
Arctic Belcher Belcher Glacier Devon Ice Cap Prince of Wales Icefield |
genre |
Arctic Ice cap Journal of Glaciology |
genre_facet |
Arctic Ice cap Journal of Glaciology |
op_source |
Journal of Glaciology, Vol 64, Pp 595-608 (2018) |
op_relation |
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143018000485/type/journal_article https://doaj.org/toc/0022-1430 https://doaj.org/toc/1727-5652 doi:10.1017/jog.2018.48 0022-1430 1727-5652 https://doaj.org/article/a429c7df010a455eb677fea65e49ccb9 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.48 |
container_title |
Journal of Glaciology |
container_volume |
64 |
container_issue |
246 |
container_start_page |
595 |
op_container_end_page |
608 |
_version_ |
1766325901824360448 |