Light pollution from illuminated bridges as a potential barrier for migrating fish–Linking measurements with a proposal for a conceptual model

• Published in: Basic and Applied Ecology
• Main Authors: Catherine Pérez Vega, Andreas Jechow, James A. Campbell, Karolina M. Zielinska-Dabkowska, Franz Hölker
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2024
• Subjects: Light pollution; Sensory pollution; Movement; Orientation; Illumination; Pitfall effect; Ecology; QH540-549.5; Anguilla anguilla; Atlantic salmon; Salmo salar
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2023.11.001; https://doaj.org/article/a372ef760db34f90b73bbbe66325fddd

Illuminated bridges have become important assets to navigable aquatic systems. However, if artificial light at night (ALAN) from illuminated bridges reaches aquatic habitats, such as rivers, it can threaten the river's natural heterogeneity and alter the behavioural responses of migratory fish. Here, via a pilot study, we quantified levels of ALAN at illuminated bridges that cross a river and, propose a conceptual model to estimate its potential implications on two migrating fish species with contrasting life histories. Night-time light measurements on the river Spree in Berlin were performed continuously along a transect and in detail at seven illuminated bridges. Photometric data of the pilot study showed rapidly increased and decreased light levels at several illuminated bridges from which we derived several model illumination scenarios. These illumination scenarios and their potential effect on migrating Atlantic salmon smolts (Salmo salar) and European silver eel (Anguilla anguilla) are presented as a conceptual model, considering illuminated bridges as behavioural barriers to fish migration. ALAN's adverse effects on freshwater habitats must be better researched, understood, managed, and properly communicated to develop future sustainable lighting practices and policies that preserve riverscapes and their biodiversity.