Comparison of the QuantiFERON®-TB Gold assay and tuberculin skin test to detect latent tuberculosis infection among target groups in Trinidad & Tobago Comparación entre la prueba QuantiFERON®-TB Gold y la prueba cutánea de la tuberculina para detectar la infección tuberculosa latente en grupos destinatarios en Trinidad y Tabago

• Main Authors: Shirematee Baboolal, Dottin Ramoutar, Patrick Eberechi Akpaka
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English; Spanish; Portuguese
• Published: Pan American Health Organization 2010
• Subjects: Tuberculosis latente; prueba de tuberculina; prueba ELISA; Trinidad y Tabago; Latent tuberculosis; tuberculin test; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Trinidad and Tobago; Medicine; R; Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine; RC955-962; Public aspects of medicine; RA1-1270; Arctic; Trinidad
• Online Access: https://doaj.org/article/a2c4d761eb734869a2d98ba93687965a

OBJECTIVE: To compare the QuantiFERON®-TB Gold (QFT-G) assay and tuberculin skin test (TST) in screening/diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among individuals in Trinidad & Tobago at high risk for TB. METHODS: A total of 560 individuals (TB patient contacts, HIV patients, health care workers, prison inmates, and TB patients [controls]) were recruited for the study. Blood was drawn and processed using the QFT-G assay, followed by immediate administration of TST solution on subjects' forearm. Data were analyzed with Epi InfoTM 3.5.1 software. Results were compared across the target groups using the chi-square test (P < 0.05). RESULTS: The QFT-G assay detected LTBI in 51% of the subjects (with most positive results occurring among the control group) whereas the TST detected it in 39.4% (P = 0.001). Overall, the QFT-G assay detected LTBI more frequently than the TST among all subjects except the control group, where detection favored the TST. The QFT-G assay produced indeterminate and nonreactive results in some HIV patients but required less turnaround time than the TST (23.3 h versus 70.2 h; P < 0.0001). The TST cost less per subject than the QFT-G assay (US $3.70 versus US $18.60; P = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: The QFT-G assay cost more but had a higher detection rate among most target groups and required less turnaround time than the TST. However, its sensitivity was lower among immunocompromised subjects. Therefore, the QFT-G assay should be used with caution for LBTI screening/diagnosis in resource-poor, high-HIV prevalence settings such as Trinidad & Tobago. OBJETIVO: Comparar la prueba QuantiFERON®-TB Gold (QFT-G) con la prueba cutánea de la tuberculina (PPD) para el tamizaje y diagnóstico de la infección tuberculosa latente (ITBL) en personas con alto riesgo de tuberculosis en Trinidad y Tabago. MÉTODOS: Para el estudio, se reclutó un total de 560 individuos (personas en contacto con pacientes de tuberculosis, pacientes con VIH, trabajadores de la salud, presidiarios y pacientes de ...