Methods to collect Anopheles mosquitoes and evaluate malaria transmission: A comparative study in two villages in Senegal

Abstract Background Various methods have been studied as replacement of human landing catches (HLC) for mosquito sampling in entomological studies on malaria transmission. Conflicting results have been obtained in comparing relative efficiency of alternative methods, according to the area, the speci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Malaria Journal
Main Authors: Sokhna Cheikh, Faye Ousmane, Bouganali Charles, Konate Lassana, Gaye Ablaye, Mazenot Catherine, Ndiath Mamadou O, Trape Jean-Francois
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-270
https://doaj.org/article/a205730ce34d485ba463b7993d8826dd
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:a205730ce34d485ba463b7993d8826dd
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:a205730ce34d485ba463b7993d8826dd 2023-05-15T15:15:16+02:00 Methods to collect Anopheles mosquitoes and evaluate malaria transmission: A comparative study in two villages in Senegal Sokhna Cheikh Faye Ousmane Bouganali Charles Konate Lassana Gaye Ablaye Mazenot Catherine Ndiath Mamadou O Trape Jean-Francois 2011-09-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-270 https://doaj.org/article/a205730ce34d485ba463b7993d8826dd EN eng BMC http://www.malariajournal.com/content/10/1/270 https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2875 doi:10.1186/1475-2875-10-270 1475-2875 https://doaj.org/article/a205730ce34d485ba463b7993d8826dd Malaria Journal, Vol 10, Iss 1, p 270 (2011) Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 article 2011 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-270 2022-12-30T23:48:46Z Abstract Background Various methods have been studied as replacement of human landing catches (HLC) for mosquito sampling in entomological studies on malaria transmission. Conflicting results have been obtained in comparing relative efficiency of alternative methods, according to the area, the species present and their density. The aim of this study was to compare the number and characteristics of mosquitoes sampled in two areas of Senegal by three different methods: HLC, light traps adjacent to an occupied bed net (LT/N), pyrethrum spray catches (PSC). Methods Collections were performed in two villages: Dielmo (Soudan savanna) and Bandafassi (Soudan Guinean savanna), two or three nights per month for a 4-5 months period during the maximal transmission season in 2001-2002. Species were identified and Plasmodium infection determined by ELISA. The specific composition, circumsporozoite protein rate and entomological inoculation rate were calculated. Results The diversity of mosquito species captured was maximal with LT/N, minimal with PSC. The mean number of anopheles captures each night was significantly different according to the method used and the species. PSC displayed a significantly lower anopheles density. HLC was the most efficient sampling method when Anopheles gambiae was the main vector (in Bandafassi); LT/N when it was Anopheles funestus (in Dielmo). A significant correlation was found between HLC and LT/M but correlation parameters were different according to the species. Circumsporozoite protein rates were not significantly different between methods or species. The entomological inoculation rate varied along with vector density and thus with methods and species. Conclusions The choice of sampling method influenced entomological data recorded. Therefore, the sampling technique has to be chosen according to the vector studied and the aim of the study. Only HLC must be considered as the reference method, but in some conditions LT/N can be used as an alternative method. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Malaria Journal 10 1
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
spellingShingle Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Sokhna Cheikh
Faye Ousmane
Bouganali Charles
Konate Lassana
Gaye Ablaye
Mazenot Catherine
Ndiath Mamadou O
Trape Jean-Francois
Methods to collect Anopheles mosquitoes and evaluate malaria transmission: A comparative study in two villages in Senegal
topic_facet Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
description Abstract Background Various methods have been studied as replacement of human landing catches (HLC) for mosquito sampling in entomological studies on malaria transmission. Conflicting results have been obtained in comparing relative efficiency of alternative methods, according to the area, the species present and their density. The aim of this study was to compare the number and characteristics of mosquitoes sampled in two areas of Senegal by three different methods: HLC, light traps adjacent to an occupied bed net (LT/N), pyrethrum spray catches (PSC). Methods Collections were performed in two villages: Dielmo (Soudan savanna) and Bandafassi (Soudan Guinean savanna), two or three nights per month for a 4-5 months period during the maximal transmission season in 2001-2002. Species were identified and Plasmodium infection determined by ELISA. The specific composition, circumsporozoite protein rate and entomological inoculation rate were calculated. Results The diversity of mosquito species captured was maximal with LT/N, minimal with PSC. The mean number of anopheles captures each night was significantly different according to the method used and the species. PSC displayed a significantly lower anopheles density. HLC was the most efficient sampling method when Anopheles gambiae was the main vector (in Bandafassi); LT/N when it was Anopheles funestus (in Dielmo). A significant correlation was found between HLC and LT/M but correlation parameters were different according to the species. Circumsporozoite protein rates were not significantly different between methods or species. The entomological inoculation rate varied along with vector density and thus with methods and species. Conclusions The choice of sampling method influenced entomological data recorded. Therefore, the sampling technique has to be chosen according to the vector studied and the aim of the study. Only HLC must be considered as the reference method, but in some conditions LT/N can be used as an alternative method.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Sokhna Cheikh
Faye Ousmane
Bouganali Charles
Konate Lassana
Gaye Ablaye
Mazenot Catherine
Ndiath Mamadou O
Trape Jean-Francois
author_facet Sokhna Cheikh
Faye Ousmane
Bouganali Charles
Konate Lassana
Gaye Ablaye
Mazenot Catherine
Ndiath Mamadou O
Trape Jean-Francois
author_sort Sokhna Cheikh
title Methods to collect Anopheles mosquitoes and evaluate malaria transmission: A comparative study in two villages in Senegal
title_short Methods to collect Anopheles mosquitoes and evaluate malaria transmission: A comparative study in two villages in Senegal
title_full Methods to collect Anopheles mosquitoes and evaluate malaria transmission: A comparative study in two villages in Senegal
title_fullStr Methods to collect Anopheles mosquitoes and evaluate malaria transmission: A comparative study in two villages in Senegal
title_full_unstemmed Methods to collect Anopheles mosquitoes and evaluate malaria transmission: A comparative study in two villages in Senegal
title_sort methods to collect anopheles mosquitoes and evaluate malaria transmission: a comparative study in two villages in senegal
publisher BMC
publishDate 2011
url https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-270
https://doaj.org/article/a205730ce34d485ba463b7993d8826dd
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Malaria Journal, Vol 10, Iss 1, p 270 (2011)
op_relation http://www.malariajournal.com/content/10/1/270
https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2875
doi:10.1186/1475-2875-10-270
1475-2875
https://doaj.org/article/a205730ce34d485ba463b7993d8826dd
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-270
container_title Malaria Journal
container_volume 10
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766345638209912832