Arctic ecosystem restoration with native tundra bryophytes
ABSTRACTBryophytes are ecologically essential to northern ecosystem restoration after disturbance. In this study, native bryophytes were used to revegetate two Arctic restoration sites. Different propagation types (small, medium, large fragments) and substrates (crushed rock, lake sediment, processe...
Published in: | Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1080/15230430.2023.2209394 https://doaj.org/article/a06e84dcce624477930974b6e1bcff9a |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:a06e84dcce624477930974b6e1bcff9a |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:a06e84dcce624477930974b6e1bcff9a 2024-09-15T17:49:03+00:00 Arctic ecosystem restoration with native tundra bryophytes Jasmine JM Lamarre Amalesh Dhar M. Anne Naeth 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1080/15230430.2023.2209394 https://doaj.org/article/a06e84dcce624477930974b6e1bcff9a EN eng Taylor & Francis Group https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15230430.2023.2209394 https://doaj.org/toc/1523-0430 https://doaj.org/toc/1938-4246 doi:10.1080/15230430.2023.2209394 1938-4246 1523-0430 https://doaj.org/article/a06e84dcce624477930974b6e1bcff9a Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, Vol 55, Iss 1 (2023) Bryophyte propagation cheesecloth erosion control restoration substrates Environmental sciences GE1-350 Ecology QH540-549.5 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1080/15230430.2023.2209394 2024-08-05T17:49:40Z ABSTRACTBryophytes are ecologically essential to northern ecosystem restoration after disturbance. In this study, native bryophytes were used to revegetate two Arctic restoration sites. Different propagation types (small, medium, large fragments) and substrates (crushed rock, lake sediment, processed kimberlite in Canada; volcanic silt loam and crushed lava rock in Iceland) with two erosion control treatments (with and without cheesecloth) were evaluated. After two growing seasons, large bryophyte fragments resulted in the greatest density and total and live cover with erosion control and medium fragments resulted in the highest density and species occurrence without erosion control. Erosion control significantly increased live cover, total cover, species occurrence, and density, including a tempering effect on soil volumetric water content and temperature. Substrates with more heterogeneous surfaces (crushed rock, volcanic silt loam, crushed lava rock) yielded higher live cover, density, and spontaneous colonization than more homogeneous substrates (processed kimberlite, lake sediment) and can be more suitable for use in arctic ecosystems revegetation. The positive outcomes in both Canada and Iceland led to the conclusion that bryophyte propagation with large to medium fragments, erosion control with cheesecloth, and substrates with heterogeneous surfaces would be effective restoration approaches where bryophyte revegetation is a focus. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarctic and Alpine Research Arctic Iceland Tundra Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 55 1 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
Bryophyte propagation cheesecloth erosion control restoration substrates Environmental sciences GE1-350 Ecology QH540-549.5 |
spellingShingle |
Bryophyte propagation cheesecloth erosion control restoration substrates Environmental sciences GE1-350 Ecology QH540-549.5 Jasmine JM Lamarre Amalesh Dhar M. Anne Naeth Arctic ecosystem restoration with native tundra bryophytes |
topic_facet |
Bryophyte propagation cheesecloth erosion control restoration substrates Environmental sciences GE1-350 Ecology QH540-549.5 |
description |
ABSTRACTBryophytes are ecologically essential to northern ecosystem restoration after disturbance. In this study, native bryophytes were used to revegetate two Arctic restoration sites. Different propagation types (small, medium, large fragments) and substrates (crushed rock, lake sediment, processed kimberlite in Canada; volcanic silt loam and crushed lava rock in Iceland) with two erosion control treatments (with and without cheesecloth) were evaluated. After two growing seasons, large bryophyte fragments resulted in the greatest density and total and live cover with erosion control and medium fragments resulted in the highest density and species occurrence without erosion control. Erosion control significantly increased live cover, total cover, species occurrence, and density, including a tempering effect on soil volumetric water content and temperature. Substrates with more heterogeneous surfaces (crushed rock, volcanic silt loam, crushed lava rock) yielded higher live cover, density, and spontaneous colonization than more homogeneous substrates (processed kimberlite, lake sediment) and can be more suitable for use in arctic ecosystems revegetation. The positive outcomes in both Canada and Iceland led to the conclusion that bryophyte propagation with large to medium fragments, erosion control with cheesecloth, and substrates with heterogeneous surfaces would be effective restoration approaches where bryophyte revegetation is a focus. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Jasmine JM Lamarre Amalesh Dhar M. Anne Naeth |
author_facet |
Jasmine JM Lamarre Amalesh Dhar M. Anne Naeth |
author_sort |
Jasmine JM Lamarre |
title |
Arctic ecosystem restoration with native tundra bryophytes |
title_short |
Arctic ecosystem restoration with native tundra bryophytes |
title_full |
Arctic ecosystem restoration with native tundra bryophytes |
title_fullStr |
Arctic ecosystem restoration with native tundra bryophytes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Arctic ecosystem restoration with native tundra bryophytes |
title_sort |
arctic ecosystem restoration with native tundra bryophytes |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1080/15230430.2023.2209394 https://doaj.org/article/a06e84dcce624477930974b6e1bcff9a |
genre |
Antarctic and Alpine Research Arctic Iceland Tundra |
genre_facet |
Antarctic and Alpine Research Arctic Iceland Tundra |
op_source |
Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, Vol 55, Iss 1 (2023) |
op_relation |
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15230430.2023.2209394 https://doaj.org/toc/1523-0430 https://doaj.org/toc/1938-4246 doi:10.1080/15230430.2023.2209394 1938-4246 1523-0430 https://doaj.org/article/a06e84dcce624477930974b6e1bcff9a |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1080/15230430.2023.2209394 |
container_title |
Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research |
container_volume |
55 |
container_issue |
1 |
_version_ |
1810290746256785408 |