Arctic ecosystem restoration with native tundra bryophytes

ABSTRACTBryophytes are ecologically essential to northern ecosystem restoration after disturbance. In this study, native bryophytes were used to revegetate two Arctic restoration sites. Different propagation types (small, medium, large fragments) and substrates (crushed rock, lake sediment, processe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research
Main Authors: Jasmine JM Lamarre, Amalesh Dhar, M. Anne Naeth
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1080/15230430.2023.2209394
https://doaj.org/article/a06e84dcce624477930974b6e1bcff9a
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:a06e84dcce624477930974b6e1bcff9a
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:a06e84dcce624477930974b6e1bcff9a 2024-09-15T17:49:03+00:00 Arctic ecosystem restoration with native tundra bryophytes Jasmine JM Lamarre Amalesh Dhar M. Anne Naeth 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1080/15230430.2023.2209394 https://doaj.org/article/a06e84dcce624477930974b6e1bcff9a EN eng Taylor & Francis Group https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15230430.2023.2209394 https://doaj.org/toc/1523-0430 https://doaj.org/toc/1938-4246 doi:10.1080/15230430.2023.2209394 1938-4246 1523-0430 https://doaj.org/article/a06e84dcce624477930974b6e1bcff9a Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, Vol 55, Iss 1 (2023) Bryophyte propagation cheesecloth erosion control restoration substrates Environmental sciences GE1-350 Ecology QH540-549.5 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1080/15230430.2023.2209394 2024-08-05T17:49:40Z ABSTRACTBryophytes are ecologically essential to northern ecosystem restoration after disturbance. In this study, native bryophytes were used to revegetate two Arctic restoration sites. Different propagation types (small, medium, large fragments) and substrates (crushed rock, lake sediment, processed kimberlite in Canada; volcanic silt loam and crushed lava rock in Iceland) with two erosion control treatments (with and without cheesecloth) were evaluated. After two growing seasons, large bryophyte fragments resulted in the greatest density and total and live cover with erosion control and medium fragments resulted in the highest density and species occurrence without erosion control. Erosion control significantly increased live cover, total cover, species occurrence, and density, including a tempering effect on soil volumetric water content and temperature. Substrates with more heterogeneous surfaces (crushed rock, volcanic silt loam, crushed lava rock) yielded higher live cover, density, and spontaneous colonization than more homogeneous substrates (processed kimberlite, lake sediment) and can be more suitable for use in arctic ecosystems revegetation. The positive outcomes in both Canada and Iceland led to the conclusion that bryophyte propagation with large to medium fragments, erosion control with cheesecloth, and substrates with heterogeneous surfaces would be effective restoration approaches where bryophyte revegetation is a focus. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarctic and Alpine Research Arctic Iceland Tundra Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 55 1
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Bryophyte propagation
cheesecloth
erosion control
restoration
substrates
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Bryophyte propagation
cheesecloth
erosion control
restoration
substrates
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Jasmine JM Lamarre
Amalesh Dhar
M. Anne Naeth
Arctic ecosystem restoration with native tundra bryophytes
topic_facet Bryophyte propagation
cheesecloth
erosion control
restoration
substrates
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Ecology
QH540-549.5
description ABSTRACTBryophytes are ecologically essential to northern ecosystem restoration after disturbance. In this study, native bryophytes were used to revegetate two Arctic restoration sites. Different propagation types (small, medium, large fragments) and substrates (crushed rock, lake sediment, processed kimberlite in Canada; volcanic silt loam and crushed lava rock in Iceland) with two erosion control treatments (with and without cheesecloth) were evaluated. After two growing seasons, large bryophyte fragments resulted in the greatest density and total and live cover with erosion control and medium fragments resulted in the highest density and species occurrence without erosion control. Erosion control significantly increased live cover, total cover, species occurrence, and density, including a tempering effect on soil volumetric water content and temperature. Substrates with more heterogeneous surfaces (crushed rock, volcanic silt loam, crushed lava rock) yielded higher live cover, density, and spontaneous colonization than more homogeneous substrates (processed kimberlite, lake sediment) and can be more suitable for use in arctic ecosystems revegetation. The positive outcomes in both Canada and Iceland led to the conclusion that bryophyte propagation with large to medium fragments, erosion control with cheesecloth, and substrates with heterogeneous surfaces would be effective restoration approaches where bryophyte revegetation is a focus.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jasmine JM Lamarre
Amalesh Dhar
M. Anne Naeth
author_facet Jasmine JM Lamarre
Amalesh Dhar
M. Anne Naeth
author_sort Jasmine JM Lamarre
title Arctic ecosystem restoration with native tundra bryophytes
title_short Arctic ecosystem restoration with native tundra bryophytes
title_full Arctic ecosystem restoration with native tundra bryophytes
title_fullStr Arctic ecosystem restoration with native tundra bryophytes
title_full_unstemmed Arctic ecosystem restoration with native tundra bryophytes
title_sort arctic ecosystem restoration with native tundra bryophytes
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.1080/15230430.2023.2209394
https://doaj.org/article/a06e84dcce624477930974b6e1bcff9a
genre Antarctic and Alpine Research
Arctic
Iceland
Tundra
genre_facet Antarctic and Alpine Research
Arctic
Iceland
Tundra
op_source Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, Vol 55, Iss 1 (2023)
op_relation https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15230430.2023.2209394
https://doaj.org/toc/1523-0430
https://doaj.org/toc/1938-4246
doi:10.1080/15230430.2023.2209394
1938-4246
1523-0430
https://doaj.org/article/a06e84dcce624477930974b6e1bcff9a
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1080/15230430.2023.2209394
container_title Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research
container_volume 55
container_issue 1
_version_ 1810290746256785408