Russian Expert and Official Geopolitical Narratives on the Arctic: Decoding Topical and Paradigmatic DNA

This article examines current Russian expert and official narratives on the Arctic, situating them in the broader context of the debate on Russia’s role in the international system. Combining a critical geopolitics approach to the study of international relations with content analysis tools, we map...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic Review on Law and Politics
Main Authors: Jakub M. Godzimirski, Alexander Sergunin
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Norwegian
Published: Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP 2020
Subjects:
Law
K
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.1350
https://doaj.org/article/9ff78968f98246b0a70168eef8ef0087
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:9ff78968f98246b0a70168eef8ef0087
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:9ff78968f98246b0a70168eef8ef0087 2023-05-15T14:21:32+02:00 Russian Expert and Official Geopolitical Narratives on the Arctic: Decoding Topical and Paradigmatic DNA Jakub M. Godzimirski Alexander Sergunin 2020-04-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.1350 https://doaj.org/article/9ff78968f98246b0a70168eef8ef0087 EN NO eng nor Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/1350/4132 https://doaj.org/toc/2387-4562 2387-4562 doi:10.23865/arctic.v11.1350 https://doaj.org/article/9ff78968f98246b0a70168eef8ef0087 Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 11, Iss 0, Pp 22-46 (2020) russia the arctic critical geopolitics expert narratives official narratives Law K article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.1350 2022-12-31T08:10:15Z This article examines current Russian expert and official narratives on the Arctic, situating them in the broader context of the debate on Russia’s role in the international system. Combining a critical geopolitics approach to the study of international relations with content analysis tools, we map how structural geopolitical changes in the wider region have shaped narratives on the Arctic in Russia today. Two types of Russian narratives on the Arctic are explored—the one put forward by members of the Russian expert community, and the one that emerges from official documents and statements by members of the Russian policymaking community. With the expert narratives, we pay particular attention to the Arctic topics featured and how they are informed by various mainstream approaches to the study of international relations (IR). In examining policy practitioners’ narrative approaches, we trace the overlaps and differences between these and the expert narratives. Current expert and official Russian narratives on the Arctic appear to be influenced mostly by neorealist and neoliberal ideas in IR, without substantial modifications after the 2014 conflict, thus showing relatively high ideational continuity. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Arctic review on law and politics Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Arctic Review on Law and Politics 11 0 22
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
Norwegian
topic russia
the arctic
critical geopolitics
expert narratives
official narratives
Law
K
spellingShingle russia
the arctic
critical geopolitics
expert narratives
official narratives
Law
K
Jakub M. Godzimirski
Alexander Sergunin
Russian Expert and Official Geopolitical Narratives on the Arctic: Decoding Topical and Paradigmatic DNA
topic_facet russia
the arctic
critical geopolitics
expert narratives
official narratives
Law
K
description This article examines current Russian expert and official narratives on the Arctic, situating them in the broader context of the debate on Russia’s role in the international system. Combining a critical geopolitics approach to the study of international relations with content analysis tools, we map how structural geopolitical changes in the wider region have shaped narratives on the Arctic in Russia today. Two types of Russian narratives on the Arctic are explored—the one put forward by members of the Russian expert community, and the one that emerges from official documents and statements by members of the Russian policymaking community. With the expert narratives, we pay particular attention to the Arctic topics featured and how they are informed by various mainstream approaches to the study of international relations (IR). In examining policy practitioners’ narrative approaches, we trace the overlaps and differences between these and the expert narratives. Current expert and official Russian narratives on the Arctic appear to be influenced mostly by neorealist and neoliberal ideas in IR, without substantial modifications after the 2014 conflict, thus showing relatively high ideational continuity.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jakub M. Godzimirski
Alexander Sergunin
author_facet Jakub M. Godzimirski
Alexander Sergunin
author_sort Jakub M. Godzimirski
title Russian Expert and Official Geopolitical Narratives on the Arctic: Decoding Topical and Paradigmatic DNA
title_short Russian Expert and Official Geopolitical Narratives on the Arctic: Decoding Topical and Paradigmatic DNA
title_full Russian Expert and Official Geopolitical Narratives on the Arctic: Decoding Topical and Paradigmatic DNA
title_fullStr Russian Expert and Official Geopolitical Narratives on the Arctic: Decoding Topical and Paradigmatic DNA
title_full_unstemmed Russian Expert and Official Geopolitical Narratives on the Arctic: Decoding Topical and Paradigmatic DNA
title_sort russian expert and official geopolitical narratives on the arctic: decoding topical and paradigmatic dna
publisher Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.1350
https://doaj.org/article/9ff78968f98246b0a70168eef8ef0087
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Arctic
Arctic review on law and politics
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
Arctic review on law and politics
op_source Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 11, Iss 0, Pp 22-46 (2020)
op_relation https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/1350/4132
https://doaj.org/toc/2387-4562
2387-4562
doi:10.23865/arctic.v11.1350
https://doaj.org/article/9ff78968f98246b0a70168eef8ef0087
op_doi https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.1350
container_title Arctic Review on Law and Politics
container_volume 11
container_issue 0
container_start_page 22
_version_ 1766294236799434752