Trading Off Co-produced Marine Ecosystem Services: Natural Resource Industries Versus Other Use and Non-use Ecosystem Service Values
Ecosystem services (ESs) may be both non-market and market based. Both may provide important input to societal welfare. Using natural resources, or converting nature in the development of market based ES may impact the access to non-market or more conservationist ES, and vice versa. How does the gen...
Published in: | Frontiers in Marine Science |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00102 https://doaj.org/article/9f153eb1c18e43e291a7a0904a56856c |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:9f153eb1c18e43e291a7a0904a56856c |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:9f153eb1c18e43e291a7a0904a56856c 2023-05-15T15:06:33+02:00 Trading Off Co-produced Marine Ecosystem Services: Natural Resource Industries Versus Other Use and Non-use Ecosystem Service Values Margrethe Aanesen Claire W. Armstrong 2019-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00102 https://doaj.org/article/9f153eb1c18e43e291a7a0904a56856c EN eng Frontiers Media S.A. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2019.00102/full https://doaj.org/toc/2296-7745 2296-7745 doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00102 https://doaj.org/article/9f153eb1c18e43e291a7a0904a56856c Frontiers in Marine Science, Vol 6 (2019) ecosystem services Arctic Norway conversion conservation Science Q General. Including nature conservation geographical distribution QH1-199.5 article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00102 2022-12-31T01:28:37Z Ecosystem services (ESs) may be both non-market and market based. Both may provide important input to societal welfare. Using natural resources, or converting nature in the development of market based ES may impact the access to non-market or more conservationist ES, and vice versa. How does the general public trade-off between these two types of ES? We use two valuation studies in Northern Norway to identify the public’s preferences for marine industries versus other marine use and non-use values. One study assesses willingness to pay to protect cold-water corals, a relatively abundant, and to some degree, protected resource off the coast of Norway. The other study elicits people’s willingness to pay for stricter regulations of industrial activity in the coastal zone, providing more coastal area for recreational activities. Both studies show strong conservation preferences, and willingness to forego blue industrial growth. However, these preferences are heterogeneous across socio-economic characteristics, and, interestingly, educational level is the characteristic that most distinctly separates the population into various preference groups. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Northern Norway Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Norway Frontiers in Marine Science 6 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
ecosystem services Arctic Norway conversion conservation Science Q General. Including nature conservation geographical distribution QH1-199.5 |
spellingShingle |
ecosystem services Arctic Norway conversion conservation Science Q General. Including nature conservation geographical distribution QH1-199.5 Margrethe Aanesen Claire W. Armstrong Trading Off Co-produced Marine Ecosystem Services: Natural Resource Industries Versus Other Use and Non-use Ecosystem Service Values |
topic_facet |
ecosystem services Arctic Norway conversion conservation Science Q General. Including nature conservation geographical distribution QH1-199.5 |
description |
Ecosystem services (ESs) may be both non-market and market based. Both may provide important input to societal welfare. Using natural resources, or converting nature in the development of market based ES may impact the access to non-market or more conservationist ES, and vice versa. How does the general public trade-off between these two types of ES? We use two valuation studies in Northern Norway to identify the public’s preferences for marine industries versus other marine use and non-use values. One study assesses willingness to pay to protect cold-water corals, a relatively abundant, and to some degree, protected resource off the coast of Norway. The other study elicits people’s willingness to pay for stricter regulations of industrial activity in the coastal zone, providing more coastal area for recreational activities. Both studies show strong conservation preferences, and willingness to forego blue industrial growth. However, these preferences are heterogeneous across socio-economic characteristics, and, interestingly, educational level is the characteristic that most distinctly separates the population into various preference groups. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Margrethe Aanesen Claire W. Armstrong |
author_facet |
Margrethe Aanesen Claire W. Armstrong |
author_sort |
Margrethe Aanesen |
title |
Trading Off Co-produced Marine Ecosystem Services: Natural Resource Industries Versus Other Use and Non-use Ecosystem Service Values |
title_short |
Trading Off Co-produced Marine Ecosystem Services: Natural Resource Industries Versus Other Use and Non-use Ecosystem Service Values |
title_full |
Trading Off Co-produced Marine Ecosystem Services: Natural Resource Industries Versus Other Use and Non-use Ecosystem Service Values |
title_fullStr |
Trading Off Co-produced Marine Ecosystem Services: Natural Resource Industries Versus Other Use and Non-use Ecosystem Service Values |
title_full_unstemmed |
Trading Off Co-produced Marine Ecosystem Services: Natural Resource Industries Versus Other Use and Non-use Ecosystem Service Values |
title_sort |
trading off co-produced marine ecosystem services: natural resource industries versus other use and non-use ecosystem service values |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00102 https://doaj.org/article/9f153eb1c18e43e291a7a0904a56856c |
geographic |
Arctic Norway |
geographic_facet |
Arctic Norway |
genre |
Arctic Northern Norway |
genre_facet |
Arctic Northern Norway |
op_source |
Frontiers in Marine Science, Vol 6 (2019) |
op_relation |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2019.00102/full https://doaj.org/toc/2296-7745 2296-7745 doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00102 https://doaj.org/article/9f153eb1c18e43e291a7a0904a56856c |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00102 |
container_title |
Frontiers in Marine Science |
container_volume |
6 |
_version_ |
1766338134726934528 |