Biogeography, diversity and environmental relationships of shelf and deep-sea benthic Amphipoda around Iceland

The waters around Iceland, bounding the Northern North Atlantic and the Nordic seas, are a region characterized by complex hydrography and seabed topography. This and the presence of the Greenland-Iceland-Faroe-Scotland ridge (GIFR) are likely to have a major impact on the diversity and distribution...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PeerJ
Main Authors: Anne-Nina Lörz, Stefanie Kaiser, Jens Oldeland, Caroline Stolter, Karlotta Kürzel, Saskia Brix
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2021
Subjects:
R
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11898
https://doaj.org/article/9d1538da1c9940aba0e16e5e8e47ec10
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:9d1538da1c9940aba0e16e5e8e47ec10
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:9d1538da1c9940aba0e16e5e8e47ec10 2024-01-07T09:41:58+01:00 Biogeography, diversity and environmental relationships of shelf and deep-sea benthic Amphipoda around Iceland Anne-Nina Lörz Stefanie Kaiser Jens Oldeland Caroline Stolter Karlotta Kürzel Saskia Brix 2021-08-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11898 https://doaj.org/article/9d1538da1c9940aba0e16e5e8e47ec10 EN eng PeerJ Inc. https://peerj.com/articles/11898.pdf https://peerj.com/articles/11898/ https://doaj.org/toc/2167-8359 doi:10.7717/peerj.11898 2167-8359 https://doaj.org/article/9d1538da1c9940aba0e16e5e8e47ec10 PeerJ, Vol 9, p e11898 (2021) Amphipoda Biodiversity Biogeography Deep sea North Atlantic Arctic Medicine R Biology (General) QH301-705.5 article 2021 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11898 2023-12-10T01:50:51Z The waters around Iceland, bounding the Northern North Atlantic and the Nordic seas, are a region characterized by complex hydrography and seabed topography. This and the presence of the Greenland-Iceland-Faroe-Scotland ridge (GIFR) are likely to have a major impact on the diversity and distribution of the benthic fauna there. Biodiversity in this region is also under increasing threat from climate-induced changes, ocean warming and acidification in particular, affecting the marine realm. The aim of the present study was to investigate the biodiversity and distributional patterns of amphipod crustaceans in Icelandic waters and how it relates to environmental variables and depth. A comprehensive data set from the literature and recent expeditions was compiled constituting distributional records for 355 amphipod species across a major depth gradient (18–3,700 m). Using a 1° hexagonal grid to map amphipod distributions and a set of environmental factors (depth, pH, phytobiomass, velocity, dissolved oxygen, dissolved iron, salinity and temperature) we could identify four distinct amphipod assemblages: A Deep-North, Deep-South, and a Coastal cluster as well as one restricted to the GIFR. In addition to depth, salinity and temperature were the main parameters that determined the distribution of amphipods. Diversity differed greatly between the depth clusters and was significantly higher in coastal and GIFR assemblages compared to the deep-sea clusters north and south of the GIFR. A variety of factors and processes are likely to be responsible for the perceived biodiversity patterns, which, however, appear to vary according to region and depth. Low diversity of amphipod communities in the Nordic basins can be interpreted as a reflection of the prevailing harsh environmental conditions in combination with a barrier effect of the GIFR. By contrast, low diversity of the deep North Atlantic assemblages might be linked to the variable nature of the oceanographic environment in the region over multiple spatio-temporal ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Atlantic Arctic Atlantic-Arctic Greenland Iceland Nordic Seas North Atlantic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Greenland PeerJ 9 e11898
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Amphipoda
Biodiversity
Biogeography
Deep sea
North Atlantic
Arctic
Medicine
R
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle Amphipoda
Biodiversity
Biogeography
Deep sea
North Atlantic
Arctic
Medicine
R
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Anne-Nina Lörz
Stefanie Kaiser
Jens Oldeland
Caroline Stolter
Karlotta Kürzel
Saskia Brix
Biogeography, diversity and environmental relationships of shelf and deep-sea benthic Amphipoda around Iceland
topic_facet Amphipoda
Biodiversity
Biogeography
Deep sea
North Atlantic
Arctic
Medicine
R
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
description The waters around Iceland, bounding the Northern North Atlantic and the Nordic seas, are a region characterized by complex hydrography and seabed topography. This and the presence of the Greenland-Iceland-Faroe-Scotland ridge (GIFR) are likely to have a major impact on the diversity and distribution of the benthic fauna there. Biodiversity in this region is also under increasing threat from climate-induced changes, ocean warming and acidification in particular, affecting the marine realm. The aim of the present study was to investigate the biodiversity and distributional patterns of amphipod crustaceans in Icelandic waters and how it relates to environmental variables and depth. A comprehensive data set from the literature and recent expeditions was compiled constituting distributional records for 355 amphipod species across a major depth gradient (18–3,700 m). Using a 1° hexagonal grid to map amphipod distributions and a set of environmental factors (depth, pH, phytobiomass, velocity, dissolved oxygen, dissolved iron, salinity and temperature) we could identify four distinct amphipod assemblages: A Deep-North, Deep-South, and a Coastal cluster as well as one restricted to the GIFR. In addition to depth, salinity and temperature were the main parameters that determined the distribution of amphipods. Diversity differed greatly between the depth clusters and was significantly higher in coastal and GIFR assemblages compared to the deep-sea clusters north and south of the GIFR. A variety of factors and processes are likely to be responsible for the perceived biodiversity patterns, which, however, appear to vary according to region and depth. Low diversity of amphipod communities in the Nordic basins can be interpreted as a reflection of the prevailing harsh environmental conditions in combination with a barrier effect of the GIFR. By contrast, low diversity of the deep North Atlantic assemblages might be linked to the variable nature of the oceanographic environment in the region over multiple spatio-temporal ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Anne-Nina Lörz
Stefanie Kaiser
Jens Oldeland
Caroline Stolter
Karlotta Kürzel
Saskia Brix
author_facet Anne-Nina Lörz
Stefanie Kaiser
Jens Oldeland
Caroline Stolter
Karlotta Kürzel
Saskia Brix
author_sort Anne-Nina Lörz
title Biogeography, diversity and environmental relationships of shelf and deep-sea benthic Amphipoda around Iceland
title_short Biogeography, diversity and environmental relationships of shelf and deep-sea benthic Amphipoda around Iceland
title_full Biogeography, diversity and environmental relationships of shelf and deep-sea benthic Amphipoda around Iceland
title_fullStr Biogeography, diversity and environmental relationships of shelf and deep-sea benthic Amphipoda around Iceland
title_full_unstemmed Biogeography, diversity and environmental relationships of shelf and deep-sea benthic Amphipoda around Iceland
title_sort biogeography, diversity and environmental relationships of shelf and deep-sea benthic amphipoda around iceland
publisher PeerJ Inc.
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11898
https://doaj.org/article/9d1538da1c9940aba0e16e5e8e47ec10
geographic Arctic
Greenland
geographic_facet Arctic
Greenland
genre Arctic
Atlantic Arctic
Atlantic-Arctic
Greenland
Iceland
Nordic Seas
North Atlantic
genre_facet Arctic
Atlantic Arctic
Atlantic-Arctic
Greenland
Iceland
Nordic Seas
North Atlantic
op_source PeerJ, Vol 9, p e11898 (2021)
op_relation https://peerj.com/articles/11898.pdf
https://peerj.com/articles/11898/
https://doaj.org/toc/2167-8359
doi:10.7717/peerj.11898
2167-8359
https://doaj.org/article/9d1538da1c9940aba0e16e5e8e47ec10
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11898
container_title PeerJ
container_volume 9
container_start_page e11898
_version_ 1787422793264005120