High‐Latitude Stratospheric Aerosol Injection to Preserve the Arctic

• Published in: Earth's Future
• Main Authors: Walker Raymond Lee, Douglas G. MacMartin, Daniele Visioni, Ben Kravitz, Yating Chen, John C. Moore, Gunter Leguy, David M. Lawrence, David A. Bailey
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2023
• Subjects: geoengineering; stratospheric aerosol injection; high‐latitude aerosol injection; sea ice; permafrost; Greenland ice sheet; Environmental sciences; GE1-350; Ecology; QH540-549.5; Arctic; Greenland; Global warming; Ice; Ice Sheet; Sea ice
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003052; https://doaj.org/article/9a37859a12884fbe95f3d7a6548794fb

Abstract Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) has been shown in climate models to reduce some impacts of global warming in the Arctic, including the loss of sea ice, permafrost thaw, and reduction of Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) mass; SAI at high latitudes could preferentially target these impacts. In this study, we use the Community Earth System Model to simulate two Arctic‐focused SAI strategies, which inject at 60°N latitude each spring with injection rates adjusted to either maintain September Arctic sea ice at 2030 levels (“Arctic Low”) or restore it to 2010 levels (“Arctic High”). Both simulations maintain or restore September sea ice to within 10% of their respective targets, reduce permafrost thaw, and increase GrIS surface mass balance by reducing runoff. Arctic High reduces these impacts more effectively than a globally focused SAI strategy that injects similar quantities of SO2 at lower latitudes. However, Arctic‐focused SAI is not merely a “reset button” for the Arctic climate, but brings about a novel climate state, including changes to the seasonal cycles of Northern Hemisphere temperature and sea ice and less high‐latitude carbon uptake relative to SSP2‐4.5. Additionally, while Arctic‐focused SAI produces the most cooling near the pole, its effects are not confined to the Arctic, including detectable cooling throughout most of the northern hemisphere for both simulations, increased mid‐latitude sulfur deposition, and a southward shift of the location of the Intertropical Convergence Zone. For these reasons, it would be incorrect to consider Arctic‐focused SAI as “local” geoengineering, even when compared to a globally focused strategy.