Hate Speech and Racialised Discrimination of the Norwegian Sámi: Legal Responses and Responsibility

This article discusses the racialised discrimination of the Sámi people and how the Norwegian judiciary deals with it. It draws historical lines to social Darwinism as practised in Norway, where comparisons of the Sámi’s physical characteristics to the Norwegian majority population were commonplace....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oslo Law Review
Main Author: Carola Lingaas
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget) 2021
Subjects:
Law
K
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2021-02-02
https://doaj.org/article/99dff42f520c4bfe8dc79dd842ad5537
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:99dff42f520c4bfe8dc79dd842ad5537
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:99dff42f520c4bfe8dc79dd842ad5537 2023-05-15T18:14:48+02:00 Hate Speech and Racialised Discrimination of the Norwegian Sámi: Legal Responses and Responsibility Carola Lingaas 2021-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2021-02-02 https://doaj.org/article/99dff42f520c4bfe8dc79dd842ad5537 EN eng Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget) http://www.idunn.no/doi/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2021-02-02 https://doaj.org/toc/2387-3299 doi:10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2021-02-02 2387-3299 https://doaj.org/article/99dff42f520c4bfe8dc79dd842ad5537 Oslo Law Review, Vol 8, Iss 2, Pp 88-107 (2021) Sámi indigenous people hate speech racial discrimination group stereotypes minority protection Law K Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720 article 2021 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2021-02-02 2022-12-31T02:25:36Z This article discusses the racialised discrimination of the Sámi people and how the Norwegian judiciary deals with it. It draws historical lines to social Darwinism as practised in Norway, where comparisons of the Sámi’s physical characteristics to the Norwegian majority population were commonplace. The official Norwegian position was that the Sámi were not an indigenous people and therefore lacked inalienable rights. The racialised understanding of the Sámi as an untrustworthy and lazy people of the past, reverberates in today’s hate speech that builds on similar stereotypes. Norway has come a long way since racial hygiene was a mainstream scientific approach. Yet, still today, the Sámi are statistically overrepresented with experiences of discrimination. This article examines the legal responses and responsibility of Norway to tackle hate speech and discriminatory utterances that manifest a racial understanding of Norway’s indigenous people. In the discussion, special emphasis is placed on Norway’s international treaty obligations. Article in Journal/Newspaper Sámi Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Norway Oslo Law Review 8 2 88 107
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Sámi
indigenous people
hate speech
racial discrimination
group stereotypes
minority protection
Law
K
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
spellingShingle Sámi
indigenous people
hate speech
racial discrimination
group stereotypes
minority protection
Law
K
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Carola Lingaas
Hate Speech and Racialised Discrimination of the Norwegian Sámi: Legal Responses and Responsibility
topic_facet Sámi
indigenous people
hate speech
racial discrimination
group stereotypes
minority protection
Law
K
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
description This article discusses the racialised discrimination of the Sámi people and how the Norwegian judiciary deals with it. It draws historical lines to social Darwinism as practised in Norway, where comparisons of the Sámi’s physical characteristics to the Norwegian majority population were commonplace. The official Norwegian position was that the Sámi were not an indigenous people and therefore lacked inalienable rights. The racialised understanding of the Sámi as an untrustworthy and lazy people of the past, reverberates in today’s hate speech that builds on similar stereotypes. Norway has come a long way since racial hygiene was a mainstream scientific approach. Yet, still today, the Sámi are statistically overrepresented with experiences of discrimination. This article examines the legal responses and responsibility of Norway to tackle hate speech and discriminatory utterances that manifest a racial understanding of Norway’s indigenous people. In the discussion, special emphasis is placed on Norway’s international treaty obligations.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Carola Lingaas
author_facet Carola Lingaas
author_sort Carola Lingaas
title Hate Speech and Racialised Discrimination of the Norwegian Sámi: Legal Responses and Responsibility
title_short Hate Speech and Racialised Discrimination of the Norwegian Sámi: Legal Responses and Responsibility
title_full Hate Speech and Racialised Discrimination of the Norwegian Sámi: Legal Responses and Responsibility
title_fullStr Hate Speech and Racialised Discrimination of the Norwegian Sámi: Legal Responses and Responsibility
title_full_unstemmed Hate Speech and Racialised Discrimination of the Norwegian Sámi: Legal Responses and Responsibility
title_sort hate speech and racialised discrimination of the norwegian sámi: legal responses and responsibility
publisher Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2021-02-02
https://doaj.org/article/99dff42f520c4bfe8dc79dd842ad5537
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Sámi
genre_facet Sámi
op_source Oslo Law Review, Vol 8, Iss 2, Pp 88-107 (2021)
op_relation http://www.idunn.no/doi/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2021-02-02
https://doaj.org/toc/2387-3299
doi:10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2021-02-02
2387-3299
https://doaj.org/article/99dff42f520c4bfe8dc79dd842ad5537
op_doi https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2021-02-02
container_title Oslo Law Review
container_volume 8
container_issue 2
container_start_page 88
op_container_end_page 107
_version_ 1766187795201654784