Petrophysical Joint Inversion Applied to Alpine Permafrost Field Sites to Image Subsurface Ice, Water, Air, and Rock Contents
Quantification of ground ice is crucial for understanding permafrost systems and modeling their ongoing degradation. The volumetric ice content is however rarely estimated in permafrost studies, as it is particularly difficult to retrieve. Standard borehole temperature monitoring is unable to provid...
Published in: | Frontiers in Earth Science |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00085 https://doaj.org/article/99b3ca2f0f1a4029879bc4c924693bab |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:99b3ca2f0f1a4029879bc4c924693bab |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:99b3ca2f0f1a4029879bc4c924693bab 2023-05-15T16:36:43+02:00 Petrophysical Joint Inversion Applied to Alpine Permafrost Field Sites to Image Subsurface Ice, Water, Air, and Rock Contents Coline Mollaret Florian M. Wagner Christin Hilbich Cristian Scapozza Christian Hauck 2020-04-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00085 https://doaj.org/article/99b3ca2f0f1a4029879bc4c924693bab EN eng Frontiers Media S.A. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feart.2020.00085/full https://doaj.org/toc/2296-6463 2296-6463 doi:10.3389/feart.2020.00085 https://doaj.org/article/99b3ca2f0f1a4029879bc4c924693bab Frontiers in Earth Science, Vol 8 (2020) joint inversion ground ice content mountain permafrost geophysics electrical resistivity refraction seismic Science Q article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00085 2022-12-31T14:46:59Z Quantification of ground ice is crucial for understanding permafrost systems and modeling their ongoing degradation. The volumetric ice content is however rarely estimated in permafrost studies, as it is particularly difficult to retrieve. Standard borehole temperature monitoring is unable to provide any ice content estimation, whereas non-invasive geophysical techniques, such as refraction seismic and electrical resistivity measurements can yield information to assess the subsurface ice distribution. Electrical and seismic data are hereby complementary sensitive to the phase change. A petrophysical joint inversion was recently developed to determine volumetric water, air, ice and rock contents from electrical and seismic data using a petrophysical model, but was so far only tested on synthetic data and one proof-of-concept field example. In order to evaluate its applicability on different types of permafrost materials and landforms (bedrock, rock glacier, talus slope), we apply this petrophysical joint inversion scheme to five profiles located in the northwestern Alps. The electrical mixing rule (Archie's second law) was hereby identified as a source of model uncertainty, as it applies only when the electrolytic conduction is the dominating process. We therefore investigate and compare four petrophysical models linking the electrical resistivity with the ground constituents: Archie's law, Archie's law with an additional surface conduction factor, a model considering only surface conduction, and the geometric mean model. In most cases, the three first resistivity relations yield largely comparable results, whose reliability is discussed. The geometric mean model better resolve high ice content, as it is less influenced by the ice-rock ambiguity. We perform a systematic analysis of the regularization parameters and then evaluate our results with validation data including thaw depths and ice contents derived from borehole measurements. Geophysical surveys have generally a lower resolution than borehole data, but ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Ice permafrost Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Frontiers in Earth Science 8 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
joint inversion ground ice content mountain permafrost geophysics electrical resistivity refraction seismic Science Q |
spellingShingle |
joint inversion ground ice content mountain permafrost geophysics electrical resistivity refraction seismic Science Q Coline Mollaret Florian M. Wagner Christin Hilbich Cristian Scapozza Christian Hauck Petrophysical Joint Inversion Applied to Alpine Permafrost Field Sites to Image Subsurface Ice, Water, Air, and Rock Contents |
topic_facet |
joint inversion ground ice content mountain permafrost geophysics electrical resistivity refraction seismic Science Q |
description |
Quantification of ground ice is crucial for understanding permafrost systems and modeling their ongoing degradation. The volumetric ice content is however rarely estimated in permafrost studies, as it is particularly difficult to retrieve. Standard borehole temperature monitoring is unable to provide any ice content estimation, whereas non-invasive geophysical techniques, such as refraction seismic and electrical resistivity measurements can yield information to assess the subsurface ice distribution. Electrical and seismic data are hereby complementary sensitive to the phase change. A petrophysical joint inversion was recently developed to determine volumetric water, air, ice and rock contents from electrical and seismic data using a petrophysical model, but was so far only tested on synthetic data and one proof-of-concept field example. In order to evaluate its applicability on different types of permafrost materials and landforms (bedrock, rock glacier, talus slope), we apply this petrophysical joint inversion scheme to five profiles located in the northwestern Alps. The electrical mixing rule (Archie's second law) was hereby identified as a source of model uncertainty, as it applies only when the electrolytic conduction is the dominating process. We therefore investigate and compare four petrophysical models linking the electrical resistivity with the ground constituents: Archie's law, Archie's law with an additional surface conduction factor, a model considering only surface conduction, and the geometric mean model. In most cases, the three first resistivity relations yield largely comparable results, whose reliability is discussed. The geometric mean model better resolve high ice content, as it is less influenced by the ice-rock ambiguity. We perform a systematic analysis of the regularization parameters and then evaluate our results with validation data including thaw depths and ice contents derived from borehole measurements. Geophysical surveys have generally a lower resolution than borehole data, but ... |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Coline Mollaret Florian M. Wagner Christin Hilbich Cristian Scapozza Christian Hauck |
author_facet |
Coline Mollaret Florian M. Wagner Christin Hilbich Cristian Scapozza Christian Hauck |
author_sort |
Coline Mollaret |
title |
Petrophysical Joint Inversion Applied to Alpine Permafrost Field Sites to Image Subsurface Ice, Water, Air, and Rock Contents |
title_short |
Petrophysical Joint Inversion Applied to Alpine Permafrost Field Sites to Image Subsurface Ice, Water, Air, and Rock Contents |
title_full |
Petrophysical Joint Inversion Applied to Alpine Permafrost Field Sites to Image Subsurface Ice, Water, Air, and Rock Contents |
title_fullStr |
Petrophysical Joint Inversion Applied to Alpine Permafrost Field Sites to Image Subsurface Ice, Water, Air, and Rock Contents |
title_full_unstemmed |
Petrophysical Joint Inversion Applied to Alpine Permafrost Field Sites to Image Subsurface Ice, Water, Air, and Rock Contents |
title_sort |
petrophysical joint inversion applied to alpine permafrost field sites to image subsurface ice, water, air, and rock contents |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00085 https://doaj.org/article/99b3ca2f0f1a4029879bc4c924693bab |
genre |
Ice permafrost |
genre_facet |
Ice permafrost |
op_source |
Frontiers in Earth Science, Vol 8 (2020) |
op_relation |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feart.2020.00085/full https://doaj.org/toc/2296-6463 2296-6463 doi:10.3389/feart.2020.00085 https://doaj.org/article/99b3ca2f0f1a4029879bc4c924693bab |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00085 |
container_title |
Frontiers in Earth Science |
container_volume |
8 |
_version_ |
1766027047224737792 |