Should Ecosystem Management Involve Active Control of Species Abundances?

We review four case studies in which there is a risk of extinction or severe reduction in highly valued species if we ignore either, or both, of two ecosystem control options. "Symptomatic control" implies direct control of extinction risk through direct harvesting or culling of competitor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and Society
Main Authors: Robert B. Lessard, Steven J. D. Martell, Carl J. Walters, Timothy E. Essington, James F. Kitchell
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01313-100201
https://doaj.org/article/9852f76f3b5947d89b9dbfe3db018668
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:9852f76f3b5947d89b9dbfe3db018668
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:9852f76f3b5947d89b9dbfe3db018668 2023-05-15T13:13:33+02:00 Should Ecosystem Management Involve Active Control of Species Abundances? Robert B. Lessard Steven J. D. Martell Carl J. Walters Timothy E. Essington James F. Kitchell 2005-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01313-100201 https://doaj.org/article/9852f76f3b5947d89b9dbfe3db018668 EN eng Resilience Alliance http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art1/ https://doaj.org/toc/1708-3087 1708-3087 doi:10.5751/ES-01313-100201 https://doaj.org/article/9852f76f3b5947d89b9dbfe3db018668 Ecology and Society, Vol 10, Iss 2, p 1 (2005) ecosystem management predator control trophic interactions Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Ecology QH540-549.5 article 2005 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01313-100201 2022-12-31T07:34:34Z We review four case studies in which there is a risk of extinction or severe reduction in highly valued species if we ignore either, or both, of two ecosystem control options. "Symptomatic control" implies direct control of extinction risk through direct harvesting or culling of competitors and predators. "Systemic control" implies treating the causes of the problem that led to an unnaturally high abundance in the first place. We demonstrate, with a discussion of historically observed population trends, how surprising trophic interactions can emerge as a result of alterations to a system. Simulation models were developed for two of the case studies as aids to adaptive policy design, to expose possible abundance changes caused by trophic interactions and to highlight key uncertainties about possible responses to ecosystem management policies involving active intervention to control abundances. With reasonable parameter values, these models predict a wide range of possible responses given available data, but do indicate a good chance that active control would reverse declines and reverse extinction risks. We find that controlling seal (Phoca vitulina) populations in the Georgia Strait increases juvenile survival rates of commercial salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) species, but that commensurate increases in hake populations from decreased seal predation could be a compensatory source of predation on juvenile salmon. We also show that wolf (Canis lupus) control and moose (Alces alces) harvest bring about a recovery in caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) populations, where simple habitat protection policies fail to recover caribou before wolf predation causes severe declines. The results help address a common problem in disturbed ecosystems, where controlling extinction risks can mean choosing between active control of species abundance or establishing policies of protection, and allowing threatened species to recover naturally. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces Canis lupus Phoca vitulina Rangifer tarandus Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Hake ENVELOPE(15.612,15.612,66.797,66.797) Ecology and Society 10 2
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic ecosystem management
predator control
trophic interactions
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle ecosystem management
predator control
trophic interactions
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Robert B. Lessard
Steven J. D. Martell
Carl J. Walters
Timothy E. Essington
James F. Kitchell
Should Ecosystem Management Involve Active Control of Species Abundances?
topic_facet ecosystem management
predator control
trophic interactions
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
description We review four case studies in which there is a risk of extinction or severe reduction in highly valued species if we ignore either, or both, of two ecosystem control options. "Symptomatic control" implies direct control of extinction risk through direct harvesting or culling of competitors and predators. "Systemic control" implies treating the causes of the problem that led to an unnaturally high abundance in the first place. We demonstrate, with a discussion of historically observed population trends, how surprising trophic interactions can emerge as a result of alterations to a system. Simulation models were developed for two of the case studies as aids to adaptive policy design, to expose possible abundance changes caused by trophic interactions and to highlight key uncertainties about possible responses to ecosystem management policies involving active intervention to control abundances. With reasonable parameter values, these models predict a wide range of possible responses given available data, but do indicate a good chance that active control would reverse declines and reverse extinction risks. We find that controlling seal (Phoca vitulina) populations in the Georgia Strait increases juvenile survival rates of commercial salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) species, but that commensurate increases in hake populations from decreased seal predation could be a compensatory source of predation on juvenile salmon. We also show that wolf (Canis lupus) control and moose (Alces alces) harvest bring about a recovery in caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) populations, where simple habitat protection policies fail to recover caribou before wolf predation causes severe declines. The results help address a common problem in disturbed ecosystems, where controlling extinction risks can mean choosing between active control of species abundance or establishing policies of protection, and allowing threatened species to recover naturally.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Robert B. Lessard
Steven J. D. Martell
Carl J. Walters
Timothy E. Essington
James F. Kitchell
author_facet Robert B. Lessard
Steven J. D. Martell
Carl J. Walters
Timothy E. Essington
James F. Kitchell
author_sort Robert B. Lessard
title Should Ecosystem Management Involve Active Control of Species Abundances?
title_short Should Ecosystem Management Involve Active Control of Species Abundances?
title_full Should Ecosystem Management Involve Active Control of Species Abundances?
title_fullStr Should Ecosystem Management Involve Active Control of Species Abundances?
title_full_unstemmed Should Ecosystem Management Involve Active Control of Species Abundances?
title_sort should ecosystem management involve active control of species abundances?
publisher Resilience Alliance
publishDate 2005
url https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01313-100201
https://doaj.org/article/9852f76f3b5947d89b9dbfe3db018668
long_lat ENVELOPE(15.612,15.612,66.797,66.797)
geographic Hake
geographic_facet Hake
genre Alces alces
Canis lupus
Phoca vitulina
Rangifer tarandus
genre_facet Alces alces
Canis lupus
Phoca vitulina
Rangifer tarandus
op_source Ecology and Society, Vol 10, Iss 2, p 1 (2005)
op_relation http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art1/
https://doaj.org/toc/1708-3087
1708-3087
doi:10.5751/ES-01313-100201
https://doaj.org/article/9852f76f3b5947d89b9dbfe3db018668
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01313-100201
container_title Ecology and Society
container_volume 10
container_issue 2
_version_ 1766259048230944768