Relationship between forest management planning units and spatial distribution of forest habitat components in Koli National Park.
This study examined the relationships between forest management planning units and patches formed by forest habitat components. The test area used was a part of Koli National Park in North Karelia, eastern Finland. Forest management planning units (i.e. forest compartments) were defined by using a t...
Published in: | Silva Fennica |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Finnish Society of Forest Science
1997
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a8539 https://doaj.org/article/9808e23b10ff42d08bcb89e3de3bf3e0 |
_version_ | 1821567528802975744 |
---|---|
author | Uuttera, Janne Hyppänen, Harri |
author_facet | Uuttera, Janne Hyppänen, Harri |
author_sort | Uuttera, Janne |
collection | Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
container_issue | 4 |
container_title | Silva Fennica |
container_volume | 31 |
description | This study examined the relationships between forest management planning units and patches formed by forest habitat components. The test area used was a part of Koli National Park in North Karelia, eastern Finland. Forest management planning units (i.e. forest compartments) were defined by using a traditional method of Finnish forestry which applies aerial photographs and compartment-wise field inventory. Patches of forest habitat components were divided according to subjective rules by using a chosen set of variables depicting the edaphic features and vegetation of a forest habitat. The spatial distribution of the habitat components was estimated with the kriging-interpolation based on systematically located sample plots. The comparisons of the two patch mosaics were made by using the standard tools of GIS. The results of the study show that forest compartment division does not correlate very strongly with the forest habitat pattern. On average, the mean patch size of the forest habitat components is greater and the number of these patches lower compared to forest compartment division. However, if the forest habitat component distribution had been considered, the number of the forest compartments would have at least doubled after intersection. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | karelia* |
genre_facet | karelia* |
id | ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:9808e23b10ff42d08bcb89e3de3bf3e0 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftdoajarticles |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a8539 |
op_relation | https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/5637 https://doaj.org/toc/2242-4075 2242-4075 doi:10.14214/sf.a8539 https://doaj.org/article/9808e23b10ff42d08bcb89e3de3bf3e0 |
op_source | Silva Fennica, Vol 31, Iss 4 (1997) |
publishDate | 1997 |
publisher | Finnish Society of Forest Science |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:9808e23b10ff42d08bcb89e3de3bf3e0 2025-01-16T22:50:27+00:00 Relationship between forest management planning units and spatial distribution of forest habitat components in Koli National Park. Uuttera, Janne Hyppänen, Harri 1997-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a8539 https://doaj.org/article/9808e23b10ff42d08bcb89e3de3bf3e0 EN eng Finnish Society of Forest Science https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/5637 https://doaj.org/toc/2242-4075 2242-4075 doi:10.14214/sf.a8539 https://doaj.org/article/9808e23b10ff42d08bcb89e3de3bf3e0 Silva Fennica, Vol 31, Iss 4 (1997) Forestry SD1-669.5 article 1997 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a8539 2022-12-31T08:47:52Z This study examined the relationships between forest management planning units and patches formed by forest habitat components. The test area used was a part of Koli National Park in North Karelia, eastern Finland. Forest management planning units (i.e. forest compartments) were defined by using a traditional method of Finnish forestry which applies aerial photographs and compartment-wise field inventory. Patches of forest habitat components were divided according to subjective rules by using a chosen set of variables depicting the edaphic features and vegetation of a forest habitat. The spatial distribution of the habitat components was estimated with the kriging-interpolation based on systematically located sample plots. The comparisons of the two patch mosaics were made by using the standard tools of GIS. The results of the study show that forest compartment division does not correlate very strongly with the forest habitat pattern. On average, the mean patch size of the forest habitat components is greater and the number of these patches lower compared to forest compartment division. However, if the forest habitat component distribution had been considered, the number of the forest compartments would have at least doubled after intersection. Article in Journal/Newspaper karelia* Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Silva Fennica 31 4 |
spellingShingle | Forestry SD1-669.5 Uuttera, Janne Hyppänen, Harri Relationship between forest management planning units and spatial distribution of forest habitat components in Koli National Park. |
title | Relationship between forest management planning units and spatial distribution of forest habitat components in Koli National Park. |
title_full | Relationship between forest management planning units and spatial distribution of forest habitat components in Koli National Park. |
title_fullStr | Relationship between forest management planning units and spatial distribution of forest habitat components in Koli National Park. |
title_full_unstemmed | Relationship between forest management planning units and spatial distribution of forest habitat components in Koli National Park. |
title_short | Relationship between forest management planning units and spatial distribution of forest habitat components in Koli National Park. |
title_sort | relationship between forest management planning units and spatial distribution of forest habitat components in koli national park. |
topic | Forestry SD1-669.5 |
topic_facet | Forestry SD1-669.5 |
url | https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a8539 https://doaj.org/article/9808e23b10ff42d08bcb89e3de3bf3e0 |