A complex systems framework for the sustainability doughnut

• Published in: People and Nature
• Main Authors: Virginia Capmourteres, Stephanie Shaw, Liane Miedema, Madhur Anand
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2019
• Subjects: human–environment interactions; planetary boundaries; social foundations; structural equation modelling; sustainable development; Human ecology. Anthropogeography; GF1-900; Ecology; QH540-549.5; Ocean acidification
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10048; https://doaj.org/article/97e5dcec7ba74f3c9fc5a2325878e500

Abstract Achieving sustainability is challenging as an environmental and socio‐economic objective, and as a complex concept whose multiple components and their interactions need to be considered. We develop a statistical model to investigate relationships among and between the planetary boundaries and social foundations of the sustainability ‘doughnut’ model. We find over 35 direct and indirect, positive and negative, influences of varying magnitude among seven boundaries (biodiversity loss, climate change, ocean acidification, land use, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles, atmospheric aerosol loading and freshwater use) and eleven foundations (energy, income, health, education, food, water, gender equality, resilience, jobs, voice and social equity). We observe that biodiversity loss is driven by other planetary boundaries (land‐use change and freshwater use), but also a social foundation (jobs, measured as vulnerable employment). The planetary boundaries of freshwater use and land use are also related: freshwater use is higher in urban centres than in rural areas. The planetary boundary of climate change is also related to land use (the extent of agricultural lands), and the social foundation of income per capita (greater income, higher carbon dioxide emissions). We also find that several social foundations are themselves interrelated. For example gender equality (measured as female participation in the work force) is mainly predicted by vulnerable employment. Also, food deficit increases with poverty level, but is alleviated by access to clean water. Education (literacy rate) and social equity (social insurance) can both lift people out of poverty. These inter‐relations suggest that both synergies and trade‐offs exist between and within boundaries and foundations. We provide a new conceptual framework that moves us away from the doughnut approach towards one that can begin to address the complex interactions that sustainability scientists and policy makers face when trying to maintain multiple social foundations ...