Follow-up assessment of visceral leishmaniasis treated patients and the impact of COVID-19 on control services in Nepal

• Published in: Tropical Medicine and Health
• Main Authors: Anand Ballabh Joshi, Megha Raj Banjara, Murari Lal Das, Nav Raj Bist, Krishna Raj Pant, Uttam Raj Pyakurel, Gokarna Dahal, Krishna Prasad Paudel, Chuman Lal Das, Axel Kroeger, Abraham Aseffa
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2023
• Subjects: Visceral leishmaniasis; Treatment follow-up; Relapse; Impact of COVID-19; Public health programmes; Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine; RC955-962; Arctic
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-023-00549-1; https://doaj.org/article/9690fc37df49412b94c30f4de1b8693b

Abstract Background Follow-up assessment of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) treated cases is important to monitor the long term effectiveness of treatment regimens. The main objective of this study was to identify the gaps and challenges in the follow-up of treated VL cases, to monitor treatment outcome and to assess the impact of COVID-19 on VL elimination services and activities. Methods Clinicians treating VL patients, district focal persons for VL, and patients treated for VL in seven high endemic districts in Nepal during 2019–2022 were interviewed to collect data on challenges in the follow-up of VL treated patients as per national strategy. Results Follow up status was poor in two districts with the largest number of reported cases. The majority of cases were children under 10 years of age (44.2%). Among 104 VL treated cases interviewed, 60.6% mentioned that clinicians had called them for follow-up but only 37.5% had complied. Among 112 VL treated cases followed up, 8 (7.14%) had relapse and 2 (1.8%) had PKDL. Among 66 cases who had VL during the COVID-19 lock down period, 32 (48.5%) were diagnosed within 1 week; however, 10 (15.1%) were diagnosed only after 4 weeks or more. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was no active search for VL because of budget constraints and lack of diagnostic tests, and no insecticide spraying was done. Conclusion Relapses and PKDL are challenges for VL elimination and a matter of concern. Successful implementation of the national strategy for follow up of treated VL cases requires addressing elements related to patients (awareness, transport, communication) clinicians (compliance) and organization of service delivery (local health worker training and deployment). COVID-19 did not have much impact on VL diagnosis and treatment; however, public health programmes including active case detection and insecticide spraying for vector control were severely reduced.