ΔO2/N2′ as a New Tracer of Marine Net Community Production: Application and Evaluation in the Subarctic Northeast Pacific and Canadian Arctic Ocean

We compared field measurements of the biological O2 saturation anomalies, ΔO2/Ar and ΔO2/N2, from simultaneous oceanographic deployments of a membrane inlet mass spectrometer and optode/gas tension device (GTD). Data from the Subarctic Northeast Pacific and Canadian Arctic Ocean were used to evaluat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Marine Science
Main Authors: Robert W. Izett, Roberta C. Hamme, Craig McNeil, Cara C. M. Manning, Annie Bourbonnais, Philippe D. Tortell
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Subjects:
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.718625
https://doaj.org/article/94bb5bf914554c3c89a5f0d96882e2b4
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:94bb5bf914554c3c89a5f0d96882e2b4
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:94bb5bf914554c3c89a5f0d96882e2b4 2023-05-15T14:56:47+02:00 ΔO2/N2′ as a New Tracer of Marine Net Community Production: Application and Evaluation in the Subarctic Northeast Pacific and Canadian Arctic Ocean Robert W. Izett Roberta C. Hamme Craig McNeil Cara C. M. Manning Annie Bourbonnais Philippe D. Tortell 2021-08-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.718625 https://doaj.org/article/94bb5bf914554c3c89a5f0d96882e2b4 EN eng Frontiers Media S.A. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.718625/full https://doaj.org/toc/2296-7745 2296-7745 doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.718625 https://doaj.org/article/94bb5bf914554c3c89a5f0d96882e2b4 Frontiers in Marine Science, Vol 8 (2021) nitrogen oxygen net community production gas dynamics air-sea exchange gas tracer Science Q General. Including nature conservation geographical distribution QH1-199.5 article 2021 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.718625 2022-12-31T06:22:15Z We compared field measurements of the biological O2 saturation anomalies, ΔO2/Ar and ΔO2/N2, from simultaneous oceanographic deployments of a membrane inlet mass spectrometer and optode/gas tension device (GTD). Data from the Subarctic Northeast Pacific and Canadian Arctic Ocean were used to evaluate ΔO2/N2 as an alternative to ΔO2/Ar for estimates of mixed layer net community production (NCP). We observed strong spatial coherence between ΔO2/Ar and ΔO2/N2, with small offsets resulting from differences in the solubility properties of Ar and N2 and their sensitivity to vertical mixing fluxes. Larger offsets between the two tracers were observed across hydrographic fronts and under elevated sea states, resulting from the differential time-response of the optode and GTD, and from bubble dissolution in the ship’s seawater lines. We used a simple numerical framework to correct for physical sources of divergence between N2 and Ar, deriving the tracer ΔO2/N2′. Over most of our survey regions, ΔO2/N2′ provided a better analog for ΔO2/Ar, and thus more accurate NCP estimates than ΔO2/N2. However, in coastal Arctic waters, ΔO2/N2 and ΔO2/N2′ performed equally well as NCP tracers. On average, mixed layer NCP estimated from ΔO2/Ar and ΔO2/N2′ agreed to within ∼2 mmol O2 m–2 d–1, with offsets typically smaller than other errors in NCP calculations. Our results demonstrate a significant potential to derive NCP from underway O2/N2 measurements across various oceanic regions. Optode/GTD systems could replace mass spectrometers for autonomous NCP derivation under many oceanographic conditions, thereby presenting opportunities to significantly expand global NCP coverage from various underway platforms. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Ocean Subarctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Arctic Ocean Pacific Frontiers in Marine Science 8
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic nitrogen
oxygen
net community production
gas dynamics
air-sea exchange
gas tracer
Science
Q
General. Including nature conservation
geographical distribution
QH1-199.5
spellingShingle nitrogen
oxygen
net community production
gas dynamics
air-sea exchange
gas tracer
Science
Q
General. Including nature conservation
geographical distribution
QH1-199.5
Robert W. Izett
Roberta C. Hamme
Craig McNeil
Cara C. M. Manning
Annie Bourbonnais
Philippe D. Tortell
ΔO2/N2′ as a New Tracer of Marine Net Community Production: Application and Evaluation in the Subarctic Northeast Pacific and Canadian Arctic Ocean
topic_facet nitrogen
oxygen
net community production
gas dynamics
air-sea exchange
gas tracer
Science
Q
General. Including nature conservation
geographical distribution
QH1-199.5
description We compared field measurements of the biological O2 saturation anomalies, ΔO2/Ar and ΔO2/N2, from simultaneous oceanographic deployments of a membrane inlet mass spectrometer and optode/gas tension device (GTD). Data from the Subarctic Northeast Pacific and Canadian Arctic Ocean were used to evaluate ΔO2/N2 as an alternative to ΔO2/Ar for estimates of mixed layer net community production (NCP). We observed strong spatial coherence between ΔO2/Ar and ΔO2/N2, with small offsets resulting from differences in the solubility properties of Ar and N2 and their sensitivity to vertical mixing fluxes. Larger offsets between the two tracers were observed across hydrographic fronts and under elevated sea states, resulting from the differential time-response of the optode and GTD, and from bubble dissolution in the ship’s seawater lines. We used a simple numerical framework to correct for physical sources of divergence between N2 and Ar, deriving the tracer ΔO2/N2′. Over most of our survey regions, ΔO2/N2′ provided a better analog for ΔO2/Ar, and thus more accurate NCP estimates than ΔO2/N2. However, in coastal Arctic waters, ΔO2/N2 and ΔO2/N2′ performed equally well as NCP tracers. On average, mixed layer NCP estimated from ΔO2/Ar and ΔO2/N2′ agreed to within ∼2 mmol O2 m–2 d–1, with offsets typically smaller than other errors in NCP calculations. Our results demonstrate a significant potential to derive NCP from underway O2/N2 measurements across various oceanic regions. Optode/GTD systems could replace mass spectrometers for autonomous NCP derivation under many oceanographic conditions, thereby presenting opportunities to significantly expand global NCP coverage from various underway platforms.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Robert W. Izett
Roberta C. Hamme
Craig McNeil
Cara C. M. Manning
Annie Bourbonnais
Philippe D. Tortell
author_facet Robert W. Izett
Roberta C. Hamme
Craig McNeil
Cara C. M. Manning
Annie Bourbonnais
Philippe D. Tortell
author_sort Robert W. Izett
title ΔO2/N2′ as a New Tracer of Marine Net Community Production: Application and Evaluation in the Subarctic Northeast Pacific and Canadian Arctic Ocean
title_short ΔO2/N2′ as a New Tracer of Marine Net Community Production: Application and Evaluation in the Subarctic Northeast Pacific and Canadian Arctic Ocean
title_full ΔO2/N2′ as a New Tracer of Marine Net Community Production: Application and Evaluation in the Subarctic Northeast Pacific and Canadian Arctic Ocean
title_fullStr ΔO2/N2′ as a New Tracer of Marine Net Community Production: Application and Evaluation in the Subarctic Northeast Pacific and Canadian Arctic Ocean
title_full_unstemmed ΔO2/N2′ as a New Tracer of Marine Net Community Production: Application and Evaluation in the Subarctic Northeast Pacific and Canadian Arctic Ocean
title_sort δo2/n2′ as a new tracer of marine net community production: application and evaluation in the subarctic northeast pacific and canadian arctic ocean
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.718625
https://doaj.org/article/94bb5bf914554c3c89a5f0d96882e2b4
geographic Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Pacific
geographic_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Pacific
genre Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Subarctic
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Subarctic
op_source Frontiers in Marine Science, Vol 8 (2021)
op_relation https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.718625/full
https://doaj.org/toc/2296-7745
2296-7745
doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.718625
https://doaj.org/article/94bb5bf914554c3c89a5f0d96882e2b4
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.718625
container_title Frontiers in Marine Science
container_volume 8
_version_ 1766328856989401088