Compensation at Market Value for Land Reform? A Critical Assessment of the MalaMala Judgment’s Approach to Compensation for Expropriation in South Africa

As the State seeks to move away from the ‘willing buyer, willing seller’ approach to determining compensation for expropriations in the context of land reform, the Property Valuation Act has been passed. It proposes determining compensation for expropriation with regard to all factors listed in sect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Recht in Afrika
Main Author: Johan Lorenzen
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:German
English
French
Published: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2014-2-151
https://doaj.org/article/93a4cf1cf531423d930a14e75cd6842e
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:93a4cf1cf531423d930a14e75cd6842e
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:93a4cf1cf531423d930a14e75cd6842e 2023-05-15T13:40:58+02:00 Compensation at Market Value for Land Reform? A Critical Assessment of the MalaMala Judgment’s Approach to Compensation for Expropriation in South Africa Johan Lorenzen 2015-05-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2014-2-151 https://doaj.org/article/93a4cf1cf531423d930a14e75cd6842e DE EN FR ger eng fre Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2363-6270-2014-2-151 https://doaj.org/toc/2363-6270 2363-6270 doi:10.5771/2363-6270-2014-2-151 https://doaj.org/article/93a4cf1cf531423d930a14e75cd6842e Recht in Afrika, Vol 17, Iss 2, Pp 151-174 (2015) Asia and Eurasia Africa Pacific Area and Antarctica KL-KWX article 2015 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2014-2-151 2022-12-31T09:29:46Z As the State seeks to move away from the ‘willing buyer, willing seller’ approach to determining compensation for expropriations in the context of land reform, the Property Valuation Act has been passed. It proposes determining compensation for expropriation with regard to all factors listed in section 25(3) of the Constitution on the assumption that this will de-emphasise market value in favour of a more holistic approach. This assumption is undercut by the recent MalaMala judgment in the Land Claims Court, where a consideration of the section 25(3) factors found no reason to deviate from market value. This paper critically assesses the MalaMala judgment. It suggests that the judgment over-emphasised market value in its approach, both in its approach to the nature of compensation and its application of the section 25(3) factors. It argues that such an approach neglects the varied understandings of the nature of compensation in comparative international law, ignores the unique language of section 25(3), and elides the historical context of land acquisition and the consequent value of land reform. The paper therefore argues that the judgment should not impede the implementation of the Property Valuation Act. “This Act therefore, seems to us like a one-edged knife - it cuts a big piece off the native and is very gentle with the European. The white man is told: ‘If the natives do not carry out the landlord’s wishes, chase them off the farm’ but the natives are not told where to go to. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Pacific Recht in Afrika 17 2 151 174
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language German
English
French
topic Asia and Eurasia
Africa
Pacific Area
and Antarctica
KL-KWX
spellingShingle Asia and Eurasia
Africa
Pacific Area
and Antarctica
KL-KWX
Johan Lorenzen
Compensation at Market Value for Land Reform? A Critical Assessment of the MalaMala Judgment’s Approach to Compensation for Expropriation in South Africa
topic_facet Asia and Eurasia
Africa
Pacific Area
and Antarctica
KL-KWX
description As the State seeks to move away from the ‘willing buyer, willing seller’ approach to determining compensation for expropriations in the context of land reform, the Property Valuation Act has been passed. It proposes determining compensation for expropriation with regard to all factors listed in section 25(3) of the Constitution on the assumption that this will de-emphasise market value in favour of a more holistic approach. This assumption is undercut by the recent MalaMala judgment in the Land Claims Court, where a consideration of the section 25(3) factors found no reason to deviate from market value. This paper critically assesses the MalaMala judgment. It suggests that the judgment over-emphasised market value in its approach, both in its approach to the nature of compensation and its application of the section 25(3) factors. It argues that such an approach neglects the varied understandings of the nature of compensation in comparative international law, ignores the unique language of section 25(3), and elides the historical context of land acquisition and the consequent value of land reform. The paper therefore argues that the judgment should not impede the implementation of the Property Valuation Act. “This Act therefore, seems to us like a one-edged knife - it cuts a big piece off the native and is very gentle with the European. The white man is told: ‘If the natives do not carry out the landlord’s wishes, chase them off the farm’ but the natives are not told where to go to.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Johan Lorenzen
author_facet Johan Lorenzen
author_sort Johan Lorenzen
title Compensation at Market Value for Land Reform? A Critical Assessment of the MalaMala Judgment’s Approach to Compensation for Expropriation in South Africa
title_short Compensation at Market Value for Land Reform? A Critical Assessment of the MalaMala Judgment’s Approach to Compensation for Expropriation in South Africa
title_full Compensation at Market Value for Land Reform? A Critical Assessment of the MalaMala Judgment’s Approach to Compensation for Expropriation in South Africa
title_fullStr Compensation at Market Value for Land Reform? A Critical Assessment of the MalaMala Judgment’s Approach to Compensation for Expropriation in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Compensation at Market Value for Land Reform? A Critical Assessment of the MalaMala Judgment’s Approach to Compensation for Expropriation in South Africa
title_sort compensation at market value for land reform? a critical assessment of the malamala judgment’s approach to compensation for expropriation in south africa
publisher Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
publishDate 2015
url https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2014-2-151
https://doaj.org/article/93a4cf1cf531423d930a14e75cd6842e
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source Recht in Afrika, Vol 17, Iss 2, Pp 151-174 (2015)
op_relation https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2363-6270-2014-2-151
https://doaj.org/toc/2363-6270
2363-6270
doi:10.5771/2363-6270-2014-2-151
https://doaj.org/article/93a4cf1cf531423d930a14e75cd6842e
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2014-2-151
container_title Recht in Afrika
container_volume 17
container_issue 2
container_start_page 151
op_container_end_page 174
_version_ 1766143843859693568