Simulation of factors affecting Emiliania huxleyi blooms in Arctic and sub-Arctic seas by CMIP5 climate models: model validation and selection

The observed warming in the Arctic is more than double the global average, and this enhanced Arctic warming is projected to continue throughout the 21st century. This rapid warming has a wide range of impacts on polar and sub-polar marine ecosystems. One of the examples of such an impact on ecosyste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biogeosciences
Main Authors: N. Gnatiuk, I. Radchenko, R. Davy, E. Morozov, L. Bobylev
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1199-2020
https://doaj.org/article/91ea798a3b874e5a90ea51b4fc7278fe
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:91ea798a3b874e5a90ea51b4fc7278fe
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:91ea798a3b874e5a90ea51b4fc7278fe 2023-05-15T14:40:08+02:00 Simulation of factors affecting Emiliania huxleyi blooms in Arctic and sub-Arctic seas by CMIP5 climate models: model validation and selection N. Gnatiuk I. Radchenko R. Davy E. Morozov L. Bobylev 2020-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1199-2020 https://doaj.org/article/91ea798a3b874e5a90ea51b4fc7278fe EN eng Copernicus Publications https://www.biogeosciences.net/17/1199/2020/bg-17-1199-2020.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1726-4170 https://doaj.org/toc/1726-4189 doi:10.5194/bg-17-1199-2020 1726-4170 1726-4189 https://doaj.org/article/91ea798a3b874e5a90ea51b4fc7278fe Biogeosciences, Vol 17, Pp 1199-1212 (2020) Ecology QH540-549.5 Life QH501-531 Geology QE1-996.5 article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1199-2020 2022-12-31T03:54:05Z The observed warming in the Arctic is more than double the global average, and this enhanced Arctic warming is projected to continue throughout the 21st century. This rapid warming has a wide range of impacts on polar and sub-polar marine ecosystems. One of the examples of such an impact on ecosystems is that of coccolithophores, particularly Emiliania huxleyi , which have expanded their range poleward during recent decades. The coccolithophore E. huxleyi plays an essential role in the global carbon cycle. Therefore, the assessment of future changes in coccolithophore blooms is very important. Currently, there are a large number of climate models that give projections for various oceanographic, meteorological, and biochemical variables in the Arctic. However, individual climate models can have large biases when compared to historical observations. The main goal of this research was to select an ensemble of climate models that most accurately reproduces the state of environmental variables that influence the coccolithophore E. huxleyi bloom over the historical period when compared to reanalysis data. We developed a novel approach for model selection to include a diverse set of measures of model skill including the spatial pattern of some variables, which had not previously been included in a model selection procedure. We applied this method to each of the Arctic and sub-Arctic seas in which E. huxleyi blooms have been observed. Once we have selected an optimal combination of climate models that most skilfully reproduce the factors which affect E. huxleyi , the projections of the future conditions in the Arctic from these models can be used to predict how E. huxleyi blooms will change in the future. Here, we present the validation of 34 CMIP5 (fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project) atmosphere–ocean general circulation models (GCMs) over the historical period 1979–2005. Furthermore, we propose a procedure of ranking and selecting these models based on the model's skill in reproducing 10 important ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Biogeosciences 17 4 1199 1212
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Ecology
QH540-549.5
Life
QH501-531
Geology
QE1-996.5
spellingShingle Ecology
QH540-549.5
Life
QH501-531
Geology
QE1-996.5
N. Gnatiuk
I. Radchenko
R. Davy
E. Morozov
L. Bobylev
Simulation of factors affecting Emiliania huxleyi blooms in Arctic and sub-Arctic seas by CMIP5 climate models: model validation and selection
topic_facet Ecology
QH540-549.5
Life
QH501-531
Geology
QE1-996.5
description The observed warming in the Arctic is more than double the global average, and this enhanced Arctic warming is projected to continue throughout the 21st century. This rapid warming has a wide range of impacts on polar and sub-polar marine ecosystems. One of the examples of such an impact on ecosystems is that of coccolithophores, particularly Emiliania huxleyi , which have expanded their range poleward during recent decades. The coccolithophore E. huxleyi plays an essential role in the global carbon cycle. Therefore, the assessment of future changes in coccolithophore blooms is very important. Currently, there are a large number of climate models that give projections for various oceanographic, meteorological, and biochemical variables in the Arctic. However, individual climate models can have large biases when compared to historical observations. The main goal of this research was to select an ensemble of climate models that most accurately reproduces the state of environmental variables that influence the coccolithophore E. huxleyi bloom over the historical period when compared to reanalysis data. We developed a novel approach for model selection to include a diverse set of measures of model skill including the spatial pattern of some variables, which had not previously been included in a model selection procedure. We applied this method to each of the Arctic and sub-Arctic seas in which E. huxleyi blooms have been observed. Once we have selected an optimal combination of climate models that most skilfully reproduce the factors which affect E. huxleyi , the projections of the future conditions in the Arctic from these models can be used to predict how E. huxleyi blooms will change in the future. Here, we present the validation of 34 CMIP5 (fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project) atmosphere–ocean general circulation models (GCMs) over the historical period 1979–2005. Furthermore, we propose a procedure of ranking and selecting these models based on the model's skill in reproducing 10 important ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author N. Gnatiuk
I. Radchenko
R. Davy
E. Morozov
L. Bobylev
author_facet N. Gnatiuk
I. Radchenko
R. Davy
E. Morozov
L. Bobylev
author_sort N. Gnatiuk
title Simulation of factors affecting Emiliania huxleyi blooms in Arctic and sub-Arctic seas by CMIP5 climate models: model validation and selection
title_short Simulation of factors affecting Emiliania huxleyi blooms in Arctic and sub-Arctic seas by CMIP5 climate models: model validation and selection
title_full Simulation of factors affecting Emiliania huxleyi blooms in Arctic and sub-Arctic seas by CMIP5 climate models: model validation and selection
title_fullStr Simulation of factors affecting Emiliania huxleyi blooms in Arctic and sub-Arctic seas by CMIP5 climate models: model validation and selection
title_full_unstemmed Simulation of factors affecting Emiliania huxleyi blooms in Arctic and sub-Arctic seas by CMIP5 climate models: model validation and selection
title_sort simulation of factors affecting emiliania huxleyi blooms in arctic and sub-arctic seas by cmip5 climate models: model validation and selection
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1199-2020
https://doaj.org/article/91ea798a3b874e5a90ea51b4fc7278fe
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Biogeosciences, Vol 17, Pp 1199-1212 (2020)
op_relation https://www.biogeosciences.net/17/1199/2020/bg-17-1199-2020.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1726-4170
https://doaj.org/toc/1726-4189
doi:10.5194/bg-17-1199-2020
1726-4170
1726-4189
https://doaj.org/article/91ea798a3b874e5a90ea51b4fc7278fe
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1199-2020
container_title Biogeosciences
container_volume 17
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1199
op_container_end_page 1212
_version_ 1766312049809293312