Ship-Iceberg Classification in SAR and Multispectral Satellite Images with Neural Networks

Classification of ships and icebergs in the Arctic in satellite images is an important problem. We study how to train deep neural networks for improving the discrimination of ships and icebergs in multispectral satellite images. We also analyze synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) images for comparison. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Author: Henning Heiselberg
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020
Subjects:
SAR
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12152353
https://doaj.org/article/9088f12279c4428f90af6bc20ec9d418
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:9088f12279c4428f90af6bc20ec9d418
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:9088f12279c4428f90af6bc20ec9d418 2023-05-15T14:57:53+02:00 Ship-Iceberg Classification in SAR and Multispectral Satellite Images with Neural Networks Henning Heiselberg 2020-07-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12152353 https://doaj.org/article/9088f12279c4428f90af6bc20ec9d418 EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/15/2353 https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 doi:10.3390/rs12152353 2072-4292 https://doaj.org/article/9088f12279c4428f90af6bc20ec9d418 Remote Sensing, Vol 12, Iss 2353, p 2353 (2020) Sentinel multispectral SAR ship iceberg convolutional neural networks Science Q article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12152353 2022-12-31T07:32:45Z Classification of ships and icebergs in the Arctic in satellite images is an important problem. We study how to train deep neural networks for improving the discrimination of ships and icebergs in multispectral satellite images. We also analyze synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) images for comparison. The annotated datasets of ships and icebergs are collected from multispectral Sentinel-2 data and taken from the C-CORE dataset of Sentinel-1 SAR images. Convolutional Neural Networks with a range of hyperparameters are tested and optimized. Classification accuracies are considerably better for deep neural networks than for support vector machines. Deeper neural nets improve the accuracy per epoch but at the cost of longer processing time. Extending the datasets with semi-supervised data from Greenland improves the accuracy considerably whereas data augmentation by rotating and flipping the images has little effect. The resulting classification accuracies for ships and icebergs are 86% for the SAR data and 96% for the MSI data due to the better resolution and more multispectral bands. The size and quality of the datasets are essential for training the deep neural networks, and methods to improve them are discussed. The reduced false alarm rates and exploitation of multisensory data are important for Arctic search and rescue services. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Greenland Iceberg* Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Greenland Remote Sensing 12 15 2353
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Sentinel
multispectral
SAR
ship
iceberg
convolutional neural networks
Science
Q
spellingShingle Sentinel
multispectral
SAR
ship
iceberg
convolutional neural networks
Science
Q
Henning Heiselberg
Ship-Iceberg Classification in SAR and Multispectral Satellite Images with Neural Networks
topic_facet Sentinel
multispectral
SAR
ship
iceberg
convolutional neural networks
Science
Q
description Classification of ships and icebergs in the Arctic in satellite images is an important problem. We study how to train deep neural networks for improving the discrimination of ships and icebergs in multispectral satellite images. We also analyze synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) images for comparison. The annotated datasets of ships and icebergs are collected from multispectral Sentinel-2 data and taken from the C-CORE dataset of Sentinel-1 SAR images. Convolutional Neural Networks with a range of hyperparameters are tested and optimized. Classification accuracies are considerably better for deep neural networks than for support vector machines. Deeper neural nets improve the accuracy per epoch but at the cost of longer processing time. Extending the datasets with semi-supervised data from Greenland improves the accuracy considerably whereas data augmentation by rotating and flipping the images has little effect. The resulting classification accuracies for ships and icebergs are 86% for the SAR data and 96% for the MSI data due to the better resolution and more multispectral bands. The size and quality of the datasets are essential for training the deep neural networks, and methods to improve them are discussed. The reduced false alarm rates and exploitation of multisensory data are important for Arctic search and rescue services.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Henning Heiselberg
author_facet Henning Heiselberg
author_sort Henning Heiselberg
title Ship-Iceberg Classification in SAR and Multispectral Satellite Images with Neural Networks
title_short Ship-Iceberg Classification in SAR and Multispectral Satellite Images with Neural Networks
title_full Ship-Iceberg Classification in SAR and Multispectral Satellite Images with Neural Networks
title_fullStr Ship-Iceberg Classification in SAR and Multispectral Satellite Images with Neural Networks
title_full_unstemmed Ship-Iceberg Classification in SAR and Multispectral Satellite Images with Neural Networks
title_sort ship-iceberg classification in sar and multispectral satellite images with neural networks
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12152353
https://doaj.org/article/9088f12279c4428f90af6bc20ec9d418
geographic Arctic
Greenland
geographic_facet Arctic
Greenland
genre Arctic
Greenland
Iceberg*
genre_facet Arctic
Greenland
Iceberg*
op_source Remote Sensing, Vol 12, Iss 2353, p 2353 (2020)
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/15/2353
https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292
doi:10.3390/rs12152353
2072-4292
https://doaj.org/article/9088f12279c4428f90af6bc20ec9d418
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12152353
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 12
container_issue 15
container_start_page 2353
_version_ 1766329988341039104