Explicit solutions for a probabilistic moraine preservation model

If a series of glacial advances occurs over the same pathway, the moraines that are now present may constitute an incomplete record of the total history. This is because a given advance can destroy the moraine left by a previous one, if the previous advance was less extensive. Gibbons, Megeath and P...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Author: PAUL MUZIKAR
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.109
https://doaj.org/article/8e915d6ab1284549b11381f7abe73a01
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:8e915d6ab1284549b11381f7abe73a01
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:8e915d6ab1284549b11381f7abe73a01 2023-05-15T16:57:35+02:00 Explicit solutions for a probabilistic moraine preservation model PAUL MUZIKAR 2016-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.109 https://doaj.org/article/8e915d6ab1284549b11381f7abe73a01 EN eng Cambridge University Press https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002214301600109X/type/journal_article https://doaj.org/toc/0022-1430 https://doaj.org/toc/1727-5652 doi:10.1017/jog.2016.109 0022-1430 1727-5652 https://doaj.org/article/8e915d6ab1284549b11381f7abe73a01 Journal of Glaciology, Vol 62, Pp 1181-1185 (2016) glaciation moraines stochastic model Environmental sciences GE1-350 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 article 2016 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.109 2023-03-12T01:30:59Z If a series of glacial advances occurs over the same pathway, the moraines that are now present may constitute an incomplete record of the total history. This is because a given advance can destroy the moraine left by a previous one, if the previous advance was less extensive. Gibbons, Megeath and Pierce (GMP) formulated an elegant stochastic model for this process; the key quantity in their analysis is $\bi P(n\vert N)$ , the probability that n moraines are preserved after N glacial advances. In their paper, GMP derive a recursion formula satisfied by $\bi P(n\vert N)$ , and use this formula to compute values of P for a range of values of n and N. In the present paper, we derive an explicit general answer for $\bi P(n\vert N)$ , and show explicit, exact results for the mean value and standard deviation of n. We use these results to develop more insight into the consequences of the GMP model; for example, to a good approximation, 〈n〉 increases as ln(N). We explain how a Bayesian approach can be used to analyze $\bi P(N\vert n)$ , the probability that there were N advances, given that we now observe n moraines. Article in Journal/Newspaper Journal of Glaciology Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Journal of Glaciology 62 236 1181 1185
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic glaciation
moraines
stochastic model
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Meteorology. Climatology
QC851-999
spellingShingle glaciation
moraines
stochastic model
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Meteorology. Climatology
QC851-999
PAUL MUZIKAR
Explicit solutions for a probabilistic moraine preservation model
topic_facet glaciation
moraines
stochastic model
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Meteorology. Climatology
QC851-999
description If a series of glacial advances occurs over the same pathway, the moraines that are now present may constitute an incomplete record of the total history. This is because a given advance can destroy the moraine left by a previous one, if the previous advance was less extensive. Gibbons, Megeath and Pierce (GMP) formulated an elegant stochastic model for this process; the key quantity in their analysis is $\bi P(n\vert N)$ , the probability that n moraines are preserved after N glacial advances. In their paper, GMP derive a recursion formula satisfied by $\bi P(n\vert N)$ , and use this formula to compute values of P for a range of values of n and N. In the present paper, we derive an explicit general answer for $\bi P(n\vert N)$ , and show explicit, exact results for the mean value and standard deviation of n. We use these results to develop more insight into the consequences of the GMP model; for example, to a good approximation, 〈n〉 increases as ln(N). We explain how a Bayesian approach can be used to analyze $\bi P(N\vert n)$ , the probability that there were N advances, given that we now observe n moraines.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author PAUL MUZIKAR
author_facet PAUL MUZIKAR
author_sort PAUL MUZIKAR
title Explicit solutions for a probabilistic moraine preservation model
title_short Explicit solutions for a probabilistic moraine preservation model
title_full Explicit solutions for a probabilistic moraine preservation model
title_fullStr Explicit solutions for a probabilistic moraine preservation model
title_full_unstemmed Explicit solutions for a probabilistic moraine preservation model
title_sort explicit solutions for a probabilistic moraine preservation model
publisher Cambridge University Press
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.109
https://doaj.org/article/8e915d6ab1284549b11381f7abe73a01
genre Journal of Glaciology
genre_facet Journal of Glaciology
op_source Journal of Glaciology, Vol 62, Pp 1181-1185 (2016)
op_relation https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002214301600109X/type/journal_article
https://doaj.org/toc/0022-1430
https://doaj.org/toc/1727-5652
doi:10.1017/jog.2016.109
0022-1430
1727-5652
https://doaj.org/article/8e915d6ab1284549b11381f7abe73a01
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.109
container_title Journal of Glaciology
container_volume 62
container_issue 236
container_start_page 1181
op_container_end_page 1185
_version_ 1766049145222594560