Explicit solutions for a probabilistic moraine preservation model
If a series of glacial advances occurs over the same pathway, the moraines that are now present may constitute an incomplete record of the total history. This is because a given advance can destroy the moraine left by a previous one, if the previous advance was less extensive. Gibbons, Megeath and P...
Published in: | Journal of Glaciology |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.109 https://doaj.org/article/8e915d6ab1284549b11381f7abe73a01 |
_version_ | 1821564099671097344 |
---|---|
author | PAUL MUZIKAR |
author_facet | PAUL MUZIKAR |
author_sort | PAUL MUZIKAR |
collection | Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
container_issue | 236 |
container_start_page | 1181 |
container_title | Journal of Glaciology |
container_volume | 62 |
description | If a series of glacial advances occurs over the same pathway, the moraines that are now present may constitute an incomplete record of the total history. This is because a given advance can destroy the moraine left by a previous one, if the previous advance was less extensive. Gibbons, Megeath and Pierce (GMP) formulated an elegant stochastic model for this process; the key quantity in their analysis is $\bi P(n\vert N)$ , the probability that n moraines are preserved after N glacial advances. In their paper, GMP derive a recursion formula satisfied by $\bi P(n\vert N)$ , and use this formula to compute values of P for a range of values of n and N. In the present paper, we derive an explicit general answer for $\bi P(n\vert N)$ , and show explicit, exact results for the mean value and standard deviation of n. We use these results to develop more insight into the consequences of the GMP model; for example, to a good approximation, 〈n〉 increases as ln(N). We explain how a Bayesian approach can be used to analyze $\bi P(N\vert n)$ , the probability that there were N advances, given that we now observe n moraines. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Journal of Glaciology |
genre_facet | Journal of Glaciology |
id | ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:8e915d6ab1284549b11381f7abe73a01 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftdoajarticles |
op_container_end_page | 1185 |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.109 |
op_relation | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002214301600109X/type/journal_article https://doaj.org/toc/0022-1430 https://doaj.org/toc/1727-5652 doi:10.1017/jog.2016.109 0022-1430 1727-5652 https://doaj.org/article/8e915d6ab1284549b11381f7abe73a01 |
op_source | Journal of Glaciology, Vol 62, Pp 1181-1185 (2016) |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:8e915d6ab1284549b11381f7abe73a01 2025-01-16T22:47:00+00:00 Explicit solutions for a probabilistic moraine preservation model PAUL MUZIKAR 2016-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.109 https://doaj.org/article/8e915d6ab1284549b11381f7abe73a01 EN eng Cambridge University Press https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002214301600109X/type/journal_article https://doaj.org/toc/0022-1430 https://doaj.org/toc/1727-5652 doi:10.1017/jog.2016.109 0022-1430 1727-5652 https://doaj.org/article/8e915d6ab1284549b11381f7abe73a01 Journal of Glaciology, Vol 62, Pp 1181-1185 (2016) glaciation moraines stochastic model Environmental sciences GE1-350 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 article 2016 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.109 2023-03-12T01:30:59Z If a series of glacial advances occurs over the same pathway, the moraines that are now present may constitute an incomplete record of the total history. This is because a given advance can destroy the moraine left by a previous one, if the previous advance was less extensive. Gibbons, Megeath and Pierce (GMP) formulated an elegant stochastic model for this process; the key quantity in their analysis is $\bi P(n\vert N)$ , the probability that n moraines are preserved after N glacial advances. In their paper, GMP derive a recursion formula satisfied by $\bi P(n\vert N)$ , and use this formula to compute values of P for a range of values of n and N. In the present paper, we derive an explicit general answer for $\bi P(n\vert N)$ , and show explicit, exact results for the mean value and standard deviation of n. We use these results to develop more insight into the consequences of the GMP model; for example, to a good approximation, 〈n〉 increases as ln(N). We explain how a Bayesian approach can be used to analyze $\bi P(N\vert n)$ , the probability that there were N advances, given that we now observe n moraines. Article in Journal/Newspaper Journal of Glaciology Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Journal of Glaciology 62 236 1181 1185 |
spellingShingle | glaciation moraines stochastic model Environmental sciences GE1-350 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 PAUL MUZIKAR Explicit solutions for a probabilistic moraine preservation model |
title | Explicit solutions for a probabilistic moraine preservation model |
title_full | Explicit solutions for a probabilistic moraine preservation model |
title_fullStr | Explicit solutions for a probabilistic moraine preservation model |
title_full_unstemmed | Explicit solutions for a probabilistic moraine preservation model |
title_short | Explicit solutions for a probabilistic moraine preservation model |
title_sort | explicit solutions for a probabilistic moraine preservation model |
topic | glaciation moraines stochastic model Environmental sciences GE1-350 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 |
topic_facet | glaciation moraines stochastic model Environmental sciences GE1-350 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 |
url | https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.109 https://doaj.org/article/8e915d6ab1284549b11381f7abe73a01 |