Effects of environmental conditions on the use of forward‐looking infrared for bear den detection in the Alaska Arctic

• Published in: Conservation Science and Practice
• Main Authors: Nils J. Pedersen, Todd J. Brinkman, Richard T. Shideler, Craig J. Perham
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2020
• Subjects: FLIR; grizzly bear; human‐bear conflict; polar bear; remote sensing; unmanned aircraft system; Ecology; QH540-549.5; General. Including nature conservation; geographical distribution; QH1-199.5; Arctic; north slope; Ursus arctos; Ursus maritimus; Alaska
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.215; https://doaj.org/article/8a76a08f30064b9d9fd1f9990c3b164e

Abstract Industrial off‐road activity in winter overlaps denning habitat of polar bear (Ursus maritimus) and grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) in the North Slope oilfields of Alaska (United States). To prevent disturbance of dens, managers have used forward‐looking infrared (FLIR) cameras to detect dens, but the effectiveness of FLIR under different environmental conditions is unresolved. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of environmental variables on FLIR‐based techniques for arctic bear den detection. Using a FLIR‐equipped unmanned aircraft system (UAS), we conducted observations of artificial polar bear (APD) and grizzly bear (AGD) dens from horizontal and vertical perspectives between December 2016 and April 2017. We recorded physical characteristics of artificial dens and weather conditions present during each observation. We captured 291 images and classified each as detection or nondetection based on the number of pixels representative of a den “hot spot.” We used logistic regression to model the effects of four weather variables on the odds of detection (detection). We found that UAS‐FLIR detects APDs two times better than AGDs, and that for both species detections are four times more likely from the vertical than horizontal perspective. Lower air temperature and wind speed, and the absence of precipitation and sunlight increased detection for APDs. A 1°C increase in air temperature lowered detection by 12% for APDs and by 8% for AGDs. We recommend that UAS‐FLIR surveys be conducted early in the denning season, on cold, clear days, with calm winds, in the absence of sunlight (e.g., civil twilight). Our study further refines the application of FLIR techniques for arctic bear den detection and offers practical recommendations for optimizing detection. Putative den locations should be confirmed by a secondary method to minimize disturbance as anthropogenic activity continues in the Arctic.