Impact of Polar Vortex Modes on Winter Weather Patterns in the Northern Hemisphere

This study is an additional investigation of stratosphere–troposphere coupling based on the recent stratospheric winter descriptions in five distinct modes: January, February, Double, Dynamical, and Radiative. These modes, established in a previous study, categorize the main stratospheric winter typ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmosphere
Main Authors: Alexis Mariaccia, Philippe Keckhut, Alain Hauchecorne
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15091062
https://doaj.org/article/893db74c226343d3b75d61d337f6cd39
_version_ 1821844499808124928
author Alexis Mariaccia
Philippe Keckhut
Alain Hauchecorne
author_facet Alexis Mariaccia
Philippe Keckhut
Alain Hauchecorne
author_sort Alexis Mariaccia
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1062
container_title Atmosphere
container_volume 15
description This study is an additional investigation of stratosphere–troposphere coupling based on the recent stratospheric winter descriptions in five distinct modes: January, February, Double, Dynamical, and Radiative. These modes, established in a previous study, categorize the main stratospheric winter typologies modulated by the timing of important sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) and final stratospheric warmings (FSWs). The novelty of this research is to investigate the Northern Annular Mode, mean sea level pressure (MSLP) anomalies in the Ural and Aleutian regions, and the decomposition of Eliassen–Palm flux into wavenumbers 1 and 2 within each mode. The results show that the January and Double modes exhibit similar pre-warming surface signals, characterized by Ural blocking and Aleutian trough events preceding weak polar vortex events. The January mode displays a positive MSLP anomaly of +395 hPa (−191 hPa) in the Ural (Aleutian) region in December, while the Double mode shows +311 hPa (−89 hPa) in November. These modes are primarily wave-1 driven, generating tropospheric responses via negative Arctic Oscillation patterns. Conversely, the February and Dynamical modes show opposite signals, with Aleutian blocking and Ural trough events preceding strong polar vortex events. In December, the February mode exhibits MSLP anomalies of +119 hPa (Aleutian) and −180 hPa (Ural), while the Dynamical mode shows +77 hPa and −184 hPa, respectively. These modes, along with important SSWs in February and dynamical FSWs, are driven by both wave-1 and wave-2 and do not significantly impact the troposphere. The Radiative mode’s occurrence is strongly related to the Aleutian blocking presence. These findings confirm that SSW timing is influenced by specific dynamical forcing related to surface precursors and underscore its importance in subsequent tropospheric responses. This study establishes a connection between early winter tropospheric conditions and upcoming stratospheric states, potentially improving seasonal forecasts in ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:893db74c226343d3b75d61d337f6cd39
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15091062
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/15/9/1062
https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4433
doi:10.3390/atmos15091062
https://doaj.org/article/893db74c226343d3b75d61d337f6cd39
op_source Atmosphere, Vol 15, Iss 9, p 1062 (2024)
publishDate 2024
publisher MDPI AG
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:893db74c226343d3b75d61d337f6cd39 2025-01-16T20:49:31+00:00 Impact of Polar Vortex Modes on Winter Weather Patterns in the Northern Hemisphere Alexis Mariaccia Philippe Keckhut Alain Hauchecorne 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15091062 https://doaj.org/article/893db74c226343d3b75d61d337f6cd39 EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/15/9/1062 https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4433 doi:10.3390/atmos15091062 https://doaj.org/article/893db74c226343d3b75d61d337f6cd39 Atmosphere, Vol 15, Iss 9, p 1062 (2024) stratosphere–troposphere coupling sudden stratospheric warming timing winter planetary wave Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 article 2024 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15091062 2024-10-02T16:07:18Z This study is an additional investigation of stratosphere–troposphere coupling based on the recent stratospheric winter descriptions in five distinct modes: January, February, Double, Dynamical, and Radiative. These modes, established in a previous study, categorize the main stratospheric winter typologies modulated by the timing of important sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) and final stratospheric warmings (FSWs). The novelty of this research is to investigate the Northern Annular Mode, mean sea level pressure (MSLP) anomalies in the Ural and Aleutian regions, and the decomposition of Eliassen–Palm flux into wavenumbers 1 and 2 within each mode. The results show that the January and Double modes exhibit similar pre-warming surface signals, characterized by Ural blocking and Aleutian trough events preceding weak polar vortex events. The January mode displays a positive MSLP anomaly of +395 hPa (−191 hPa) in the Ural (Aleutian) region in December, while the Double mode shows +311 hPa (−89 hPa) in November. These modes are primarily wave-1 driven, generating tropospheric responses via negative Arctic Oscillation patterns. Conversely, the February and Dynamical modes show opposite signals, with Aleutian blocking and Ural trough events preceding strong polar vortex events. In December, the February mode exhibits MSLP anomalies of +119 hPa (Aleutian) and −180 hPa (Ural), while the Dynamical mode shows +77 hPa and −184 hPa, respectively. These modes, along with important SSWs in February and dynamical FSWs, are driven by both wave-1 and wave-2 and do not significantly impact the troposphere. The Radiative mode’s occurrence is strongly related to the Aleutian blocking presence. These findings confirm that SSW timing is influenced by specific dynamical forcing related to surface precursors and underscore its importance in subsequent tropospheric responses. This study establishes a connection between early winter tropospheric conditions and upcoming stratospheric states, potentially improving seasonal forecasts in ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Atmosphere 15 9 1062
spellingShingle stratosphere–troposphere coupling
sudden stratospheric warming
timing
winter
planetary wave
Meteorology. Climatology
QC851-999
Alexis Mariaccia
Philippe Keckhut
Alain Hauchecorne
Impact of Polar Vortex Modes on Winter Weather Patterns in the Northern Hemisphere
title Impact of Polar Vortex Modes on Winter Weather Patterns in the Northern Hemisphere
title_full Impact of Polar Vortex Modes on Winter Weather Patterns in the Northern Hemisphere
title_fullStr Impact of Polar Vortex Modes on Winter Weather Patterns in the Northern Hemisphere
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Polar Vortex Modes on Winter Weather Patterns in the Northern Hemisphere
title_short Impact of Polar Vortex Modes on Winter Weather Patterns in the Northern Hemisphere
title_sort impact of polar vortex modes on winter weather patterns in the northern hemisphere
topic stratosphere–troposphere coupling
sudden stratospheric warming
timing
winter
planetary wave
Meteorology. Climatology
QC851-999
topic_facet stratosphere–troposphere coupling
sudden stratospheric warming
timing
winter
planetary wave
Meteorology. Climatology
QC851-999
url https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15091062
https://doaj.org/article/893db74c226343d3b75d61d337f6cd39