Geotechnical Measurements for the Investigation and Assessment of Arctic Coastal Erosion—A Review and Outlook

Geotechnical data are increasingly utilized to aid investigations of coastal erosion and the development of coastal morphological models; however, measurement techniques are still challenged by environmental conditions and accessibility in coastal areas, and particularly, by nearshore conditions. Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Main Authors: Nina Stark, Brendan Green, Nick Brilli, Emily Eidam, Kevin W. Franke, Kaleb Markert
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10070914
https://doaj.org/article/892b16b4967f42c5af2108822a0e0406
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:892b16b4967f42c5af2108822a0e0406
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:892b16b4967f42c5af2108822a0e0406 2023-05-15T14:50:07+02:00 Geotechnical Measurements for the Investigation and Assessment of Arctic Coastal Erosion—A Review and Outlook Nina Stark Brendan Green Nick Brilli Emily Eidam Kevin W. Franke Kaleb Markert 2022-07-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10070914 https://doaj.org/article/892b16b4967f42c5af2108822a0e0406 EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/10/7/914 https://doaj.org/toc/2077-1312 doi:10.3390/jmse10070914 2077-1312 https://doaj.org/article/892b16b4967f42c5af2108822a0e0406 Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, Vol 10, Iss 914, p 914 (2022) Arctic coastal erosion geotechnical site characterization multi-disciplinary measuring strategies Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering VM1-989 Oceanography GC1-1581 article 2022 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10070914 2022-12-31T01:04:04Z Geotechnical data are increasingly utilized to aid investigations of coastal erosion and the development of coastal morphological models; however, measurement techniques are still challenged by environmental conditions and accessibility in coastal areas, and particularly, by nearshore conditions. These challenges are exacerbated for Arctic coastal environments. This article reviews existing and emerging data collection methods in the context of geotechnical investigations of Arctic coastal erosion and nearshore change. Specifically, the use of cone penetration testing (CPT), which can provide key data for the mapping of soil and ice layers as well as for the assessment of slope and block failures, and the use of free-fall penetrometers (FFPs) for rapid mapping of seabed surface conditions, are discussed. Because of limitations in the spatial coverage and number of available in situ point measurements by penetrometers, data fusion with geophysical and remotely sensed data is considered. Offshore and nearshore, the combination of acoustic surveying with geotechnical testing can optimize large-scale seabed characterization, while onshore most recent developments in satellite-based and unmanned-aerial-vehicle-based data collection offer new opportunities to enhance spatial coverage and collect information on bathymetry and topography, amongst others. Emphasis is given to easily deployable and rugged techniques and strategies that can offer near-term opportunities to fill current gaps in data availability. This review suggests that data fusion of geotechnical in situ testing, using CPT to provide soil information at deeper depths and even in the presence of ice and using FFPs to offer rapid and large-coverage geotechnical testing of surface sediments (i.e., in the upper tens of centimeters to meters of sediment depth), combined with acoustic seabed surveying and emerging remote sensing tools, has the potential to provide essential data to improve the prediction of Arctic coastal erosion, particularly where ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 10 7 914
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Arctic coastal erosion
geotechnical site characterization
multi-disciplinary measuring strategies
Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering
VM1-989
Oceanography
GC1-1581
spellingShingle Arctic coastal erosion
geotechnical site characterization
multi-disciplinary measuring strategies
Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering
VM1-989
Oceanography
GC1-1581
Nina Stark
Brendan Green
Nick Brilli
Emily Eidam
Kevin W. Franke
Kaleb Markert
Geotechnical Measurements for the Investigation and Assessment of Arctic Coastal Erosion—A Review and Outlook
topic_facet Arctic coastal erosion
geotechnical site characterization
multi-disciplinary measuring strategies
Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering
VM1-989
Oceanography
GC1-1581
description Geotechnical data are increasingly utilized to aid investigations of coastal erosion and the development of coastal morphological models; however, measurement techniques are still challenged by environmental conditions and accessibility in coastal areas, and particularly, by nearshore conditions. These challenges are exacerbated for Arctic coastal environments. This article reviews existing and emerging data collection methods in the context of geotechnical investigations of Arctic coastal erosion and nearshore change. Specifically, the use of cone penetration testing (CPT), which can provide key data for the mapping of soil and ice layers as well as for the assessment of slope and block failures, and the use of free-fall penetrometers (FFPs) for rapid mapping of seabed surface conditions, are discussed. Because of limitations in the spatial coverage and number of available in situ point measurements by penetrometers, data fusion with geophysical and remotely sensed data is considered. Offshore and nearshore, the combination of acoustic surveying with geotechnical testing can optimize large-scale seabed characterization, while onshore most recent developments in satellite-based and unmanned-aerial-vehicle-based data collection offer new opportunities to enhance spatial coverage and collect information on bathymetry and topography, amongst others. Emphasis is given to easily deployable and rugged techniques and strategies that can offer near-term opportunities to fill current gaps in data availability. This review suggests that data fusion of geotechnical in situ testing, using CPT to provide soil information at deeper depths and even in the presence of ice and using FFPs to offer rapid and large-coverage geotechnical testing of surface sediments (i.e., in the upper tens of centimeters to meters of sediment depth), combined with acoustic seabed surveying and emerging remote sensing tools, has the potential to provide essential data to improve the prediction of Arctic coastal erosion, particularly where ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Nina Stark
Brendan Green
Nick Brilli
Emily Eidam
Kevin W. Franke
Kaleb Markert
author_facet Nina Stark
Brendan Green
Nick Brilli
Emily Eidam
Kevin W. Franke
Kaleb Markert
author_sort Nina Stark
title Geotechnical Measurements for the Investigation and Assessment of Arctic Coastal Erosion—A Review and Outlook
title_short Geotechnical Measurements for the Investigation and Assessment of Arctic Coastal Erosion—A Review and Outlook
title_full Geotechnical Measurements for the Investigation and Assessment of Arctic Coastal Erosion—A Review and Outlook
title_fullStr Geotechnical Measurements for the Investigation and Assessment of Arctic Coastal Erosion—A Review and Outlook
title_full_unstemmed Geotechnical Measurements for the Investigation and Assessment of Arctic Coastal Erosion—A Review and Outlook
title_sort geotechnical measurements for the investigation and assessment of arctic coastal erosion—a review and outlook
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10070914
https://doaj.org/article/892b16b4967f42c5af2108822a0e0406
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, Vol 10, Iss 914, p 914 (2022)
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/10/7/914
https://doaj.org/toc/2077-1312
doi:10.3390/jmse10070914
2077-1312
https://doaj.org/article/892b16b4967f42c5af2108822a0e0406
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10070914
container_title Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
container_volume 10
container_issue 7
container_start_page 914
_version_ 1766321183365529600