Arctic Offshore Oil in Russia: Optimism, Pessimism and Realism

A strong global interest in the hydrocarbon resources of the Arctic emerged in the mid-2000s, after the US Geological Survey published data on its petroleum potential. While oil prices were growing, an “Arctic optimism” prevailed everywhere, and it was anticipated that a broad-scale oil production i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: N. N. Poussenkova
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Russian
Published: Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”) 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/8831a199e7a94a82b847d16ba69e61d0
_version_ 1821799646745329664
author N. N. Poussenkova
author_facet N. N. Poussenkova
author_sort N. N. Poussenkova
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
description A strong global interest in the hydrocarbon resources of the Arctic emerged in the mid-2000s, after the US Geological Survey published data on its petroleum potential. While oil prices were growing, an “Arctic optimism” prevailed everywhere, and it was anticipated that a broad-scale oil production in the Arctic would soon begin. At that time, a political aspect dominated in the Russian plans to develop Arctic offshore. Russia intended to prove that it was an energy power capable of establishing a new petroleum province in the Polar seas to replace the aging West Siberia.But later the global energy sector underwent radical changes, and optimism was gradually replaced by realism. The decline of oil prices and introduction of anti-Russian sanctions contributed to the downgrading of the Arctic plans in Russia. Besides, the monopoly of Gazprom and Rosneft on the Arctic shelf hinders the development of its hydrocarbon resources because the state companies do not have sufficient competencies to operate offshore fields on their own.After 2014, Russian oil companies began to revise downwards their plans of oil production in the Arctic seas. Given the sanctions and low oil prices, now relevant ministries also more realistically perceive the prospects of the northern continental shelf development, and their new attitude is clearly visible in their public statements. Thus, they indirectly admit that Russia is not ready yet for environmentally sustainable activities in the Arctic offshore. Actually, many experts and oil companies previously demonstrated a cautious approach to the possibility of the broad-scale oil production in the Polar seas reminding that the potential of the mature Russian oil provinces onshore is still significant. Now, the government makes a strong focus on the onshore alternatives to the Arctic shelf of Russia: the development of hard-torecover reserves, enhanced oil recovery, and support of small and mid-size companies, i.e. the priorities seemingly shift from the extensive to the intensive mode of ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:8831a199e7a94a82b847d16ba69e61d0
institution Open Polar
language English
Russian
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
op_relation https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/812
https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240
https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324
2542-0240
2587-9324
https://doaj.org/article/8831a199e7a94a82b847d16ba69e61d0
op_source Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право, Vol 14, Iss 4, Pp 62-80 (2021)
publishDate 2021
publisher Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:8831a199e7a94a82b847d16ba69e61d0 2025-01-16T20:03:54+00:00 Arctic Offshore Oil in Russia: Optimism, Pessimism and Realism N. N. Poussenkova 2021-07-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/8831a199e7a94a82b847d16ba69e61d0 EN RU eng rus Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”) https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/812 https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240 https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324 2542-0240 2587-9324 https://doaj.org/article/8831a199e7a94a82b847d16ba69e61d0 Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право, Vol 14, Iss 4, Pp 62-80 (2021) arctic oil companies oil production continental shelf rosneft gazprom neft environmental safety hard-to-recover reserves International relations JZ2-6530 article 2021 ftdoajarticles 2023-11-05T01:43:54Z A strong global interest in the hydrocarbon resources of the Arctic emerged in the mid-2000s, after the US Geological Survey published data on its petroleum potential. While oil prices were growing, an “Arctic optimism” prevailed everywhere, and it was anticipated that a broad-scale oil production in the Arctic would soon begin. At that time, a political aspect dominated in the Russian plans to develop Arctic offshore. Russia intended to prove that it was an energy power capable of establishing a new petroleum province in the Polar seas to replace the aging West Siberia.But later the global energy sector underwent radical changes, and optimism was gradually replaced by realism. The decline of oil prices and introduction of anti-Russian sanctions contributed to the downgrading of the Arctic plans in Russia. Besides, the monopoly of Gazprom and Rosneft on the Arctic shelf hinders the development of its hydrocarbon resources because the state companies do not have sufficient competencies to operate offshore fields on their own.After 2014, Russian oil companies began to revise downwards their plans of oil production in the Arctic seas. Given the sanctions and low oil prices, now relevant ministries also more realistically perceive the prospects of the northern continental shelf development, and their new attitude is clearly visible in their public statements. Thus, they indirectly admit that Russia is not ready yet for environmentally sustainable activities in the Arctic offshore. Actually, many experts and oil companies previously demonstrated a cautious approach to the possibility of the broad-scale oil production in the Polar seas reminding that the potential of the mature Russian oil provinces onshore is still significant. Now, the government makes a strong focus on the onshore alternatives to the Arctic shelf of Russia: the development of hard-torecover reserves, enhanced oil recovery, and support of small and mid-size companies, i.e. the priorities seemingly shift from the extensive to the intensive mode of ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic
spellingShingle arctic
oil companies
oil production
continental shelf
rosneft
gazprom neft
environmental safety
hard-to-recover reserves
International relations
JZ2-6530
N. N. Poussenkova
Arctic Offshore Oil in Russia: Optimism, Pessimism and Realism
title Arctic Offshore Oil in Russia: Optimism, Pessimism and Realism
title_full Arctic Offshore Oil in Russia: Optimism, Pessimism and Realism
title_fullStr Arctic Offshore Oil in Russia: Optimism, Pessimism and Realism
title_full_unstemmed Arctic Offshore Oil in Russia: Optimism, Pessimism and Realism
title_short Arctic Offshore Oil in Russia: Optimism, Pessimism and Realism
title_sort arctic offshore oil in russia: optimism, pessimism and realism
topic arctic
oil companies
oil production
continental shelf
rosneft
gazprom neft
environmental safety
hard-to-recover reserves
International relations
JZ2-6530
topic_facet arctic
oil companies
oil production
continental shelf
rosneft
gazprom neft
environmental safety
hard-to-recover reserves
International relations
JZ2-6530
url https://doaj.org/article/8831a199e7a94a82b847d16ba69e61d0