People with Intellectual Disabilities Can Speak for themselves! A Methodological Discussion of Using People with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities as Participants in Living Conditions Studies

In 2016–2017, a living conditions survey was conducted among people with intellectual disabilities in Sami areas in Norway. The aim of this article is to discuss methodological aspects of carrying out living conditions studies where people with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities answer the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
Main Author: Hege Gjertsen
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Stockholm University Press 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.615
https://doaj.org/article/861af9ef65cb470c9d397ad441b8d9f0
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:861af9ef65cb470c9d397ad441b8d9f0
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:861af9ef65cb470c9d397ad441b8d9f0 2023-10-01T03:59:16+02:00 People with Intellectual Disabilities Can Speak for themselves! A Methodological Discussion of Using People with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities as Participants in Living Conditions Studies Hege Gjertsen 2019-06-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.615 https://doaj.org/article/861af9ef65cb470c9d397ad441b8d9f0 EN eng Stockholm University Press https://www.sjdr.se/articles/615 https://doaj.org/toc/1745-3011 1745-3011 doi:10.16993/sjdr.615 https://doaj.org/article/861af9ef65cb470c9d397ad441b8d9f0 Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, Vol 21, Iss 1 (2019) living conditions studies intellectual disabilities research method gatekeepers Social sciences (General) H1-99 article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.615 2023-09-03T00:43:35Z In 2016–2017, a living conditions survey was conducted among people with intellectual disabilities in Sami areas in Norway. The aim of this article is to discuss methodological aspects of carrying out living conditions studies where people with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities answer the questions themselves. What kinds of methodological challenges related to the reliability and validity of the study arise? How do we cope with these challenges? How can they affect the quality of the study? The challenge, among other things, is whether we measure what we want to measure. We argue it is possible to let people with intellectual disabilities answer surveys if we carefully consider methodological and research ethical issues throughout the entire research process. To let people with intellectual disabilities answer for themselves will strengthen the quality of the research. At the same time, we must recognise the limitations. Article in Journal/Newspaper sami Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Norway Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 21 1 141 149
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic living conditions studies
intellectual disabilities
research method
gatekeepers
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
spellingShingle living conditions studies
intellectual disabilities
research method
gatekeepers
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
Hege Gjertsen
People with Intellectual Disabilities Can Speak for themselves! A Methodological Discussion of Using People with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities as Participants in Living Conditions Studies
topic_facet living conditions studies
intellectual disabilities
research method
gatekeepers
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
description In 2016–2017, a living conditions survey was conducted among people with intellectual disabilities in Sami areas in Norway. The aim of this article is to discuss methodological aspects of carrying out living conditions studies where people with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities answer the questions themselves. What kinds of methodological challenges related to the reliability and validity of the study arise? How do we cope with these challenges? How can they affect the quality of the study? The challenge, among other things, is whether we measure what we want to measure. We argue it is possible to let people with intellectual disabilities answer surveys if we carefully consider methodological and research ethical issues throughout the entire research process. To let people with intellectual disabilities answer for themselves will strengthen the quality of the research. At the same time, we must recognise the limitations.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hege Gjertsen
author_facet Hege Gjertsen
author_sort Hege Gjertsen
title People with Intellectual Disabilities Can Speak for themselves! A Methodological Discussion of Using People with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities as Participants in Living Conditions Studies
title_short People with Intellectual Disabilities Can Speak for themselves! A Methodological Discussion of Using People with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities as Participants in Living Conditions Studies
title_full People with Intellectual Disabilities Can Speak for themselves! A Methodological Discussion of Using People with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities as Participants in Living Conditions Studies
title_fullStr People with Intellectual Disabilities Can Speak for themselves! A Methodological Discussion of Using People with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities as Participants in Living Conditions Studies
title_full_unstemmed People with Intellectual Disabilities Can Speak for themselves! A Methodological Discussion of Using People with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities as Participants in Living Conditions Studies
title_sort people with intellectual disabilities can speak for themselves! a methodological discussion of using people with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities as participants in living conditions studies
publisher Stockholm University Press
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.615
https://doaj.org/article/861af9ef65cb470c9d397ad441b8d9f0
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre sami
genre_facet sami
op_source Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, Vol 21, Iss 1 (2019)
op_relation https://www.sjdr.se/articles/615
https://doaj.org/toc/1745-3011
1745-3011
doi:10.16993/sjdr.615
https://doaj.org/article/861af9ef65cb470c9d397ad441b8d9f0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.615
container_title Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
container_volume 21
container_issue 1
container_start_page 141
op_container_end_page 149
_version_ 1778533009400528896