People with Intellectual Disabilities Can Speak for themselves! A Methodological Discussion of Using People with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities as Participants in Living Conditions Studies
In 2016–2017, a living conditions survey was conducted among people with intellectual disabilities in Sami areas in Norway. The aim of this article is to discuss methodological aspects of carrying out living conditions studies where people with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities answer the...
Published in: | Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Stockholm University Press
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.615 https://doaj.org/article/861af9ef65cb470c9d397ad441b8d9f0 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:861af9ef65cb470c9d397ad441b8d9f0 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:861af9ef65cb470c9d397ad441b8d9f0 2023-10-01T03:59:16+02:00 People with Intellectual Disabilities Can Speak for themselves! A Methodological Discussion of Using People with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities as Participants in Living Conditions Studies Hege Gjertsen 2019-06-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.615 https://doaj.org/article/861af9ef65cb470c9d397ad441b8d9f0 EN eng Stockholm University Press https://www.sjdr.se/articles/615 https://doaj.org/toc/1745-3011 1745-3011 doi:10.16993/sjdr.615 https://doaj.org/article/861af9ef65cb470c9d397ad441b8d9f0 Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, Vol 21, Iss 1 (2019) living conditions studies intellectual disabilities research method gatekeepers Social sciences (General) H1-99 article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.615 2023-09-03T00:43:35Z In 2016–2017, a living conditions survey was conducted among people with intellectual disabilities in Sami areas in Norway. The aim of this article is to discuss methodological aspects of carrying out living conditions studies where people with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities answer the questions themselves. What kinds of methodological challenges related to the reliability and validity of the study arise? How do we cope with these challenges? How can they affect the quality of the study? The challenge, among other things, is whether we measure what we want to measure. We argue it is possible to let people with intellectual disabilities answer surveys if we carefully consider methodological and research ethical issues throughout the entire research process. To let people with intellectual disabilities answer for themselves will strengthen the quality of the research. At the same time, we must recognise the limitations. Article in Journal/Newspaper sami Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Norway Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 21 1 141 149 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
living conditions studies intellectual disabilities research method gatekeepers Social sciences (General) H1-99 |
spellingShingle |
living conditions studies intellectual disabilities research method gatekeepers Social sciences (General) H1-99 Hege Gjertsen People with Intellectual Disabilities Can Speak for themselves! A Methodological Discussion of Using People with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities as Participants in Living Conditions Studies |
topic_facet |
living conditions studies intellectual disabilities research method gatekeepers Social sciences (General) H1-99 |
description |
In 2016–2017, a living conditions survey was conducted among people with intellectual disabilities in Sami areas in Norway. The aim of this article is to discuss methodological aspects of carrying out living conditions studies where people with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities answer the questions themselves. What kinds of methodological challenges related to the reliability and validity of the study arise? How do we cope with these challenges? How can they affect the quality of the study? The challenge, among other things, is whether we measure what we want to measure. We argue it is possible to let people with intellectual disabilities answer surveys if we carefully consider methodological and research ethical issues throughout the entire research process. To let people with intellectual disabilities answer for themselves will strengthen the quality of the research. At the same time, we must recognise the limitations. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Hege Gjertsen |
author_facet |
Hege Gjertsen |
author_sort |
Hege Gjertsen |
title |
People with Intellectual Disabilities Can Speak for themselves! A Methodological Discussion of Using People with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities as Participants in Living Conditions Studies |
title_short |
People with Intellectual Disabilities Can Speak for themselves! A Methodological Discussion of Using People with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities as Participants in Living Conditions Studies |
title_full |
People with Intellectual Disabilities Can Speak for themselves! A Methodological Discussion of Using People with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities as Participants in Living Conditions Studies |
title_fullStr |
People with Intellectual Disabilities Can Speak for themselves! A Methodological Discussion of Using People with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities as Participants in Living Conditions Studies |
title_full_unstemmed |
People with Intellectual Disabilities Can Speak for themselves! A Methodological Discussion of Using People with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities as Participants in Living Conditions Studies |
title_sort |
people with intellectual disabilities can speak for themselves! a methodological discussion of using people with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities as participants in living conditions studies |
publisher |
Stockholm University Press |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.615 https://doaj.org/article/861af9ef65cb470c9d397ad441b8d9f0 |
geographic |
Norway |
geographic_facet |
Norway |
genre |
sami |
genre_facet |
sami |
op_source |
Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, Vol 21, Iss 1 (2019) |
op_relation |
https://www.sjdr.se/articles/615 https://doaj.org/toc/1745-3011 1745-3011 doi:10.16993/sjdr.615 https://doaj.org/article/861af9ef65cb470c9d397ad441b8d9f0 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.615 |
container_title |
Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research |
container_volume |
21 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
141 |
op_container_end_page |
149 |
_version_ |
1778533009400528896 |