The North Sea and Svalbard Fisheries Management Regimes in the Context of Brexit: Divergence and Implications
The North Sea fishery has maintained sound and stable cooperative management over the past four decades. European Union (EU) countries exchange quotas with Norway for fish stocks in their respective fisheries jurisdictions within the framework of the EU Common Fisheries Policy (EU CFP) and the Agree...
Published in: | Fishes |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7060351 https://doaj.org/article/82cde02be5ff4b51b9b31b98c888f61f |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:82cde02be5ff4b51b9b31b98c888f61f |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:82cde02be5ff4b51b9b31b98c888f61f 2023-05-15T14:30:52+02:00 The North Sea and Svalbard Fisheries Management Regimes in the Context of Brexit: Divergence and Implications Yitong Chen Yinan Wang 2022-11-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7060351 https://doaj.org/article/82cde02be5ff4b51b9b31b98c888f61f EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/7/6/351 https://doaj.org/toc/2410-3888 doi:10.3390/fishes7060351 2410-3888 https://doaj.org/article/82cde02be5ff4b51b9b31b98c888f61f Fishes, Vol 7, Iss 351, p 351 (2022) North Sea fisheries management EU Common Fisheries Policy quota system fisheries agreement Svalbard Fisheries Protection Zone Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Genetics QH426-470 article 2022 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7060351 2022-12-30T19:32:06Z The North Sea fishery has maintained sound and stable cooperative management over the past four decades. European Union (EU) countries exchange quotas with Norway for fish stocks in their respective fisheries jurisdictions within the framework of the EU Common Fisheries Policy (EU CFP) and the Agreement on Fisheries between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway. After beginning the Brexit process with a concomitant transitional arrangement, the United Kingdom remained in the EU CFP until the end of 2020. From 2021 onward, the United Kingdom became a completely independent coastal state outside the EU CFP framework. In this context, the long-standing and stable fisheries access and quota exchange system between Norway and the EU will face tensions. The differences among the United Kingdom, the EU and Norway in fisheries also involve quotas and access to the Svalbard Protection Zone. Norway even intends to expand the fisheries conflict to the Arctic Council. To prevent the adverse consequences of conflict spillover and to achieve sustainable development of fisheries and win–win cooperation in fisheries management, the United Kingdom, the EU and Norway launched a series of actions on fisheries issues. In tripartite negotiations, each party has its advantages. Ultimately, win–win cooperation in the fisheries game is the three parties’ expected outcome. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Council Arctic Svalbard Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Norway Svalbard Fishes 7 6 351 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
North Sea fisheries management EU Common Fisheries Policy quota system fisheries agreement Svalbard Fisheries Protection Zone Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Genetics QH426-470 |
spellingShingle |
North Sea fisheries management EU Common Fisheries Policy quota system fisheries agreement Svalbard Fisheries Protection Zone Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Genetics QH426-470 Yitong Chen Yinan Wang The North Sea and Svalbard Fisheries Management Regimes in the Context of Brexit: Divergence and Implications |
topic_facet |
North Sea fisheries management EU Common Fisheries Policy quota system fisheries agreement Svalbard Fisheries Protection Zone Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Genetics QH426-470 |
description |
The North Sea fishery has maintained sound and stable cooperative management over the past four decades. European Union (EU) countries exchange quotas with Norway for fish stocks in their respective fisheries jurisdictions within the framework of the EU Common Fisheries Policy (EU CFP) and the Agreement on Fisheries between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway. After beginning the Brexit process with a concomitant transitional arrangement, the United Kingdom remained in the EU CFP until the end of 2020. From 2021 onward, the United Kingdom became a completely independent coastal state outside the EU CFP framework. In this context, the long-standing and stable fisheries access and quota exchange system between Norway and the EU will face tensions. The differences among the United Kingdom, the EU and Norway in fisheries also involve quotas and access to the Svalbard Protection Zone. Norway even intends to expand the fisheries conflict to the Arctic Council. To prevent the adverse consequences of conflict spillover and to achieve sustainable development of fisheries and win–win cooperation in fisheries management, the United Kingdom, the EU and Norway launched a series of actions on fisheries issues. In tripartite negotiations, each party has its advantages. Ultimately, win–win cooperation in the fisheries game is the three parties’ expected outcome. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Yitong Chen Yinan Wang |
author_facet |
Yitong Chen Yinan Wang |
author_sort |
Yitong Chen |
title |
The North Sea and Svalbard Fisheries Management Regimes in the Context of Brexit: Divergence and Implications |
title_short |
The North Sea and Svalbard Fisheries Management Regimes in the Context of Brexit: Divergence and Implications |
title_full |
The North Sea and Svalbard Fisheries Management Regimes in the Context of Brexit: Divergence and Implications |
title_fullStr |
The North Sea and Svalbard Fisheries Management Regimes in the Context of Brexit: Divergence and Implications |
title_full_unstemmed |
The North Sea and Svalbard Fisheries Management Regimes in the Context of Brexit: Divergence and Implications |
title_sort |
north sea and svalbard fisheries management regimes in the context of brexit: divergence and implications |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7060351 https://doaj.org/article/82cde02be5ff4b51b9b31b98c888f61f |
geographic |
Arctic Norway Svalbard |
geographic_facet |
Arctic Norway Svalbard |
genre |
Arctic Council Arctic Svalbard |
genre_facet |
Arctic Council Arctic Svalbard |
op_source |
Fishes, Vol 7, Iss 351, p 351 (2022) |
op_relation |
https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/7/6/351 https://doaj.org/toc/2410-3888 doi:10.3390/fishes7060351 2410-3888 https://doaj.org/article/82cde02be5ff4b51b9b31b98c888f61f |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7060351 |
container_title |
Fishes |
container_volume |
7 |
container_issue |
6 |
container_start_page |
351 |
_version_ |
1766304659649069056 |