Herbivorous protist growth and grazing rates at in situ and artificially elevated temperatures during an Arctic phytoplankton spring bloom

To assess protistan grazing impact and temperature sensitivity on plankton population dynamics, we measured bulk and species-specific phytoplankton growth and herbivorous protist grazing rates in Disko Bay, West Greenland in April-May 2011. Rate estimates were made at three different temperatures in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PeerJ
Main Authors: Susanne Menden-Deuer, Caitlyn Lawrence, Gayantonia Franzè
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Subjects:
R
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5264
https://doaj.org/article/80c456e4ea8f4cb9b5f7877cab2f047c
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:80c456e4ea8f4cb9b5f7877cab2f047c
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:80c456e4ea8f4cb9b5f7877cab2f047c 2024-01-07T09:41:37+01:00 Herbivorous protist growth and grazing rates at in situ and artificially elevated temperatures during an Arctic phytoplankton spring bloom Susanne Menden-Deuer Caitlyn Lawrence Gayantonia Franzè 2018-07-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5264 https://doaj.org/article/80c456e4ea8f4cb9b5f7877cab2f047c EN eng PeerJ Inc. https://peerj.com/articles/5264.pdf https://peerj.com/articles/5264/ https://doaj.org/toc/2167-8359 doi:10.7717/peerj.5264 2167-8359 https://doaj.org/article/80c456e4ea8f4cb9b5f7877cab2f047c PeerJ, Vol 6, p e5264 (2018) Arctic ecosystem Food-web dynamics Spring bloom Grazing Temperature response Plankton production Medicine R Biology (General) QH301-705.5 article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5264 2023-12-10T01:51:13Z To assess protistan grazing impact and temperature sensitivity on plankton population dynamics, we measured bulk and species-specific phytoplankton growth and herbivorous protist grazing rates in Disko Bay, West Greenland in April-May 2011. Rate estimates were made at three different temperatures in situ (0 °C), +3 °C and +6 °C over ambient. In situ Chlorophyll a (Chl a) doubled during the observation period to ∼12 µg Chl a L−1, with 60–97% of Chl a in the >20 µm size-fraction dominated by the diatom genus Chaetoceros. Herbivorous dinoflagellates comprised 60–80% of microplankton grazer biomass. At in situ temperatures, phytoplankton growth or grazing by herbivorous predators <200 µm was not measurable until 11 days after observations commenced. Thereafter, phytoplankton growth was on average 0.25 d−1. Phytoplankton mortality due to herbivorous grazing was only measured on three occasions but the magnitude was substantial, up to 0.58 d−1. Grazing of this magnitude removed ∼100% of primary production. In short-term temperature-shift incubation experiments, phytoplankton growth rate increased significantly (20%) at elevated temperatures. In contrast, herbivorous protist grazing and species-specific growth rates decreased significantly (50%) at +6 °C. This differential response in phytoplankton and herbivores to temperature increases resulted in a decrease of primary production removed with increasing temperature. Phaeocystis spp. abundance was negatively correlated with bulk grazing rate. Growth and grazing rates were variable but showed no evidence of an inherent, low temperature limitation. Herbivorous protist growth rates in this study and in a literature review were comparable to rates from temperate waters. Thus, an inherent physiological inhibition of protistan growth or grazing rates in polar waters is not supported by the data. The large variability between lack of grazing and high rates of primary production removal observed here and confirmed in the literature for polar waters implies larger ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Disko Bay Greenland Phytoplankton Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Greenland PeerJ 6 e5264
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Arctic ecosystem
Food-web dynamics
Spring bloom
Grazing
Temperature response
Plankton production
Medicine
R
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle Arctic ecosystem
Food-web dynamics
Spring bloom
Grazing
Temperature response
Plankton production
Medicine
R
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Susanne Menden-Deuer
Caitlyn Lawrence
Gayantonia Franzè
Herbivorous protist growth and grazing rates at in situ and artificially elevated temperatures during an Arctic phytoplankton spring bloom
topic_facet Arctic ecosystem
Food-web dynamics
Spring bloom
Grazing
Temperature response
Plankton production
Medicine
R
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
description To assess protistan grazing impact and temperature sensitivity on plankton population dynamics, we measured bulk and species-specific phytoplankton growth and herbivorous protist grazing rates in Disko Bay, West Greenland in April-May 2011. Rate estimates were made at three different temperatures in situ (0 °C), +3 °C and +6 °C over ambient. In situ Chlorophyll a (Chl a) doubled during the observation period to ∼12 µg Chl a L−1, with 60–97% of Chl a in the >20 µm size-fraction dominated by the diatom genus Chaetoceros. Herbivorous dinoflagellates comprised 60–80% of microplankton grazer biomass. At in situ temperatures, phytoplankton growth or grazing by herbivorous predators <200 µm was not measurable until 11 days after observations commenced. Thereafter, phytoplankton growth was on average 0.25 d−1. Phytoplankton mortality due to herbivorous grazing was only measured on three occasions but the magnitude was substantial, up to 0.58 d−1. Grazing of this magnitude removed ∼100% of primary production. In short-term temperature-shift incubation experiments, phytoplankton growth rate increased significantly (20%) at elevated temperatures. In contrast, herbivorous protist grazing and species-specific growth rates decreased significantly (50%) at +6 °C. This differential response in phytoplankton and herbivores to temperature increases resulted in a decrease of primary production removed with increasing temperature. Phaeocystis spp. abundance was negatively correlated with bulk grazing rate. Growth and grazing rates were variable but showed no evidence of an inherent, low temperature limitation. Herbivorous protist growth rates in this study and in a literature review were comparable to rates from temperate waters. Thus, an inherent physiological inhibition of protistan growth or grazing rates in polar waters is not supported by the data. The large variability between lack of grazing and high rates of primary production removal observed here and confirmed in the literature for polar waters implies larger ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Susanne Menden-Deuer
Caitlyn Lawrence
Gayantonia Franzè
author_facet Susanne Menden-Deuer
Caitlyn Lawrence
Gayantonia Franzè
author_sort Susanne Menden-Deuer
title Herbivorous protist growth and grazing rates at in situ and artificially elevated temperatures during an Arctic phytoplankton spring bloom
title_short Herbivorous protist growth and grazing rates at in situ and artificially elevated temperatures during an Arctic phytoplankton spring bloom
title_full Herbivorous protist growth and grazing rates at in situ and artificially elevated temperatures during an Arctic phytoplankton spring bloom
title_fullStr Herbivorous protist growth and grazing rates at in situ and artificially elevated temperatures during an Arctic phytoplankton spring bloom
title_full_unstemmed Herbivorous protist growth and grazing rates at in situ and artificially elevated temperatures during an Arctic phytoplankton spring bloom
title_sort herbivorous protist growth and grazing rates at in situ and artificially elevated temperatures during an arctic phytoplankton spring bloom
publisher PeerJ Inc.
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5264
https://doaj.org/article/80c456e4ea8f4cb9b5f7877cab2f047c
geographic Arctic
Greenland
geographic_facet Arctic
Greenland
genre Arctic
Disko Bay
Greenland
Phytoplankton
genre_facet Arctic
Disko Bay
Greenland
Phytoplankton
op_source PeerJ, Vol 6, p e5264 (2018)
op_relation https://peerj.com/articles/5264.pdf
https://peerj.com/articles/5264/
https://doaj.org/toc/2167-8359
doi:10.7717/peerj.5264
2167-8359
https://doaj.org/article/80c456e4ea8f4cb9b5f7877cab2f047c
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5264
container_title PeerJ
container_volume 6
container_start_page e5264
_version_ 1787422420631552000