The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?

Apart from the question of whether permanent exemptions from EU rules could be achieved in Iceland’s (by now halted) EU accession negotiations, the EU’s institutional development in the wake of the Lisbon Treaty has been used as a key argument for the conservative government to first suspend the neg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Veftímaritið Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla
Main Author: Maximilian Conrad
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Icelandic
Published: University of Iceland 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3
https://doaj.org/article/80a8b6f90daa415ab14ab75bfea83cc9
_version_ 1821554501424775168
author Maximilian Conrad
author_facet Maximilian Conrad
author_sort Maximilian Conrad
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
container_issue 1
container_start_page 31
container_title Veftímaritið Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla
container_volume 10
description Apart from the question of whether permanent exemptions from EU rules could be achieved in Iceland’s (by now halted) EU accession negotiations, the EU’s institutional development in the wake of the Lisbon Treaty has been used as a key argument for the conservative government to first suspend the negotiations and subsequently also to propose to withdraw the membership application altogether. In this regard, concerns about the democratic quality of EU decision making play a key role. However, as this article argues, the institutional development of the EU since Lisbon, particularly in relation to democratic governance, has been considerably more subtle than it is claimed to be and has to be seen as a continuation of a much longer process. More importantly, however, the debate leaves pressing questions about the nature of the EU as a polity unaddressed. In this context, this article addresses the question of what kind of democracy is possible in the kind of polity sui generis that the EU undoubtedly is.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:80a8b6f90daa415ab14ab75bfea83cc9
institution Open Polar
language English
Icelandic
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
op_doi https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3
op_relation http://www.irpa.is/article/view/1321
https://doaj.org/toc/1670-6803
https://doaj.org/toc/1670-679X
1670-6803
1670-679X
doi:10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3
https://doaj.org/article/80a8b6f90daa415ab14ab75bfea83cc9
op_source Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 31-50 (2014)
publishDate 2014
publisher University of Iceland
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:80a8b6f90daa415ab14ab75bfea83cc9 2025-01-16T22:37:43+00:00 The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland? Maximilian Conrad 2014-06-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3 https://doaj.org/article/80a8b6f90daa415ab14ab75bfea83cc9 EN IS eng ice University of Iceland http://www.irpa.is/article/view/1321 https://doaj.org/toc/1670-6803 https://doaj.org/toc/1670-679X 1670-6803 1670-679X doi:10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3 https://doaj.org/article/80a8b6f90daa415ab14ab75bfea83cc9 Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 31-50 (2014) European Union Lisbon Treaty institutional reform democratic deficit Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 Political science (General) JA1-92 article 2014 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3 2022-12-31T11:05:46Z Apart from the question of whether permanent exemptions from EU rules could be achieved in Iceland’s (by now halted) EU accession negotiations, the EU’s institutional development in the wake of the Lisbon Treaty has been used as a key argument for the conservative government to first suspend the negotiations and subsequently also to propose to withdraw the membership application altogether. In this regard, concerns about the democratic quality of EU decision making play a key role. However, as this article argues, the institutional development of the EU since Lisbon, particularly in relation to democratic governance, has been considerably more subtle than it is claimed to be and has to be seen as a continuation of a much longer process. More importantly, however, the debate leaves pressing questions about the nature of the EU as a polity unaddressed. In this context, this article addresses the question of what kind of democracy is possible in the kind of polity sui generis that the EU undoubtedly is. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Veftímaritið Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla 10 1 31
spellingShingle European Union
Lisbon Treaty
institutional reform
democratic deficit
Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
Political science (General)
JA1-92
Maximilian Conrad
The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?
title The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?
title_full The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?
title_fullStr The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?
title_full_unstemmed The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?
title_short The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?
title_sort eu’s post-lisbon democratic development: what lessons for iceland?
topic European Union
Lisbon Treaty
institutional reform
democratic deficit
Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
Political science (General)
JA1-92
topic_facet European Union
Lisbon Treaty
institutional reform
democratic deficit
Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
Political science (General)
JA1-92
url https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3
https://doaj.org/article/80a8b6f90daa415ab14ab75bfea83cc9