Evaluation of the Empirical Scaling Factor of Joule Heating Rates in TIE‐GCM With EISCAT Measurements

Abstract Joule heating is one of the main energy inputs into the thermosphere‐ionosphere system. Precise modeling of this process is essential for any space weather application. Existing thermosphere‐ionosphere models tend to underestimate the actual Joule heating rate quite significantly. The Therm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Earth and Space Science
Main Authors: Florian Günzkofer, Huixin Liu, Gunter Stober, Dimitry Pokhotelov, Claudia Borries
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EA003447
https://doaj.org/article/7f209b06b7104bbd9dc2d5ab075717c6
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:7f209b06b7104bbd9dc2d5ab075717c6
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:7f209b06b7104bbd9dc2d5ab075717c6 2024-09-15T18:04:29+00:00 Evaluation of the Empirical Scaling Factor of Joule Heating Rates in TIE‐GCM With EISCAT Measurements Florian Günzkofer Huixin Liu Gunter Stober Dimitry Pokhotelov Claudia Borries 2024-04-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EA003447 https://doaj.org/article/7f209b06b7104bbd9dc2d5ab075717c6 EN eng American Geophysical Union (AGU) https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EA003447 https://doaj.org/toc/2333-5084 2333-5084 doi:10.1029/2023EA003447 https://doaj.org/article/7f209b06b7104bbd9dc2d5ab075717c6 Earth and Space Science, Vol 11, Iss 4, Pp n/a-n/a (2024) Joule heating incoherent scatter radar ionosphere model polar plasma convection Astronomy QB1-991 Geology QE1-996.5 article 2024 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EA003447 2024-08-05T17:49:32Z Abstract Joule heating is one of the main energy inputs into the thermosphere‐ionosphere system. Precise modeling of this process is essential for any space weather application. Existing thermosphere‐ionosphere models tend to underestimate the actual Joule heating rate quite significantly. The Thermosphere‐Ionosphere‐Electrodynamics General‐Circulation‐Model applies an empirical scaling factor of 1.5 for compensation. We calculate vertical profiles of Joule heating rates from approximately 2,220 hr of measurements with the EISCAT incoherent scatter radar and the corresponding model runs. We investigate model runs with the plasma convection driven by both the Heelis and the Weimer model. The required scaling of the Joule heating profiles is determined with respect to the Kp index, the Kan‐Lee merging electric field EKL, and the magnetic local time. Though the default scaling factor of 1.5 appears to be adequate on average, we find that the required scaling varies strongly with all three parameters ranging from 0.46 to ∼20 at geomagnetically disturbed and quiet times, respectively. Furthermore, the required scaling is significantly different in runs driven by the Heelis and Weimer model. Adjusting the scaling factor with respect to the Kp index, EKL, the magnetic local time, and the choice of convection model would reduce the difference between Joule heating rates calculated from measurement and model plasma parameters. Article in Journal/Newspaper EISCAT Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Earth and Space Science 11 4
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Joule heating
incoherent scatter radar
ionosphere model
polar plasma convection
Astronomy
QB1-991
Geology
QE1-996.5
spellingShingle Joule heating
incoherent scatter radar
ionosphere model
polar plasma convection
Astronomy
QB1-991
Geology
QE1-996.5
Florian Günzkofer
Huixin Liu
Gunter Stober
Dimitry Pokhotelov
Claudia Borries
Evaluation of the Empirical Scaling Factor of Joule Heating Rates in TIE‐GCM With EISCAT Measurements
topic_facet Joule heating
incoherent scatter radar
ionosphere model
polar plasma convection
Astronomy
QB1-991
Geology
QE1-996.5
description Abstract Joule heating is one of the main energy inputs into the thermosphere‐ionosphere system. Precise modeling of this process is essential for any space weather application. Existing thermosphere‐ionosphere models tend to underestimate the actual Joule heating rate quite significantly. The Thermosphere‐Ionosphere‐Electrodynamics General‐Circulation‐Model applies an empirical scaling factor of 1.5 for compensation. We calculate vertical profiles of Joule heating rates from approximately 2,220 hr of measurements with the EISCAT incoherent scatter radar and the corresponding model runs. We investigate model runs with the plasma convection driven by both the Heelis and the Weimer model. The required scaling of the Joule heating profiles is determined with respect to the Kp index, the Kan‐Lee merging electric field EKL, and the magnetic local time. Though the default scaling factor of 1.5 appears to be adequate on average, we find that the required scaling varies strongly with all three parameters ranging from 0.46 to ∼20 at geomagnetically disturbed and quiet times, respectively. Furthermore, the required scaling is significantly different in runs driven by the Heelis and Weimer model. Adjusting the scaling factor with respect to the Kp index, EKL, the magnetic local time, and the choice of convection model would reduce the difference between Joule heating rates calculated from measurement and model plasma parameters.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Florian Günzkofer
Huixin Liu
Gunter Stober
Dimitry Pokhotelov
Claudia Borries
author_facet Florian Günzkofer
Huixin Liu
Gunter Stober
Dimitry Pokhotelov
Claudia Borries
author_sort Florian Günzkofer
title Evaluation of the Empirical Scaling Factor of Joule Heating Rates in TIE‐GCM With EISCAT Measurements
title_short Evaluation of the Empirical Scaling Factor of Joule Heating Rates in TIE‐GCM With EISCAT Measurements
title_full Evaluation of the Empirical Scaling Factor of Joule Heating Rates in TIE‐GCM With EISCAT Measurements
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Empirical Scaling Factor of Joule Heating Rates in TIE‐GCM With EISCAT Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Empirical Scaling Factor of Joule Heating Rates in TIE‐GCM With EISCAT Measurements
title_sort evaluation of the empirical scaling factor of joule heating rates in tie‐gcm with eiscat measurements
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
publishDate 2024
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EA003447
https://doaj.org/article/7f209b06b7104bbd9dc2d5ab075717c6
genre EISCAT
genre_facet EISCAT
op_source Earth and Space Science, Vol 11, Iss 4, Pp n/a-n/a (2024)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EA003447
https://doaj.org/toc/2333-5084
2333-5084
doi:10.1029/2023EA003447
https://doaj.org/article/7f209b06b7104bbd9dc2d5ab075717c6
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EA003447
container_title Earth and Space Science
container_volume 11
container_issue 4
_version_ 1810441976607145984