How much do we know about seabird bycatch in pelagic longline fisheries? A simulation study on the potential bias caused by the usually unobserved portion of seabird bycatch.

Not much is known about the fleet level total seabird bycatch from pelagic longlines of United States vessels in the western North Atlantic or other fleets of the Atlantic or other oceans. Onboard observers generally only record seabird bycatch during line hauling. Seabirds are predominantly caught...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLOS ONE
Main Authors: Can Zhou, Yan Jiao, Joan Browder
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019
Subjects:
R
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220797
https://doaj.org/article/7dcec64c7f5a4ea7bca513c4da89c9d9
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:7dcec64c7f5a4ea7bca513c4da89c9d9
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:7dcec64c7f5a4ea7bca513c4da89c9d9 2023-05-15T17:32:05+02:00 How much do we know about seabird bycatch in pelagic longline fisheries? A simulation study on the potential bias caused by the usually unobserved portion of seabird bycatch. Can Zhou Yan Jiao Joan Browder 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220797 https://doaj.org/article/7dcec64c7f5a4ea7bca513c4da89c9d9 EN eng Public Library of Science (PLoS) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220797 https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203 1932-6203 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220797 https://doaj.org/article/7dcec64c7f5a4ea7bca513c4da89c9d9 PLoS ONE, Vol 14, Iss 8, p e0220797 (2019) Medicine R Science Q article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220797 2022-12-31T07:33:20Z Not much is known about the fleet level total seabird bycatch from pelagic longlines of United States vessels in the western North Atlantic or other fleets of the Atlantic or other oceans. Onboard observers generally only record seabird bycatch during line hauling. Seabirds are predominantly caught during the line setting stage, and, due to predation or mechanical action, those caught prior to the haul can drop off the hook and be lost to the onboard observer. We developed a model to gauge the size of this bycatch loss problem and provide a first approximation of its impact on estimates of total fleet bycatch. We started with a traditional loss-free bycatch model, which assumes that birds recorded were the only birds captured, and integrated into it two crucial components of the bycatch process: capture origin (set or haul) and bycatch loss of set-captures. We extracted count data on seabird bycatch loss and bycatch mortality from the literature on other longline fisheries and used these data to simulate potential total seabird bycatch in the western North Atlantic. Simulations revealed the shortcomings of both the traditional bycatch model and the current haul-only observer protocol, each of which contributed to biologically significant underestimation of total bycatch and estimation uncertainty. Based on our results, we recommend a loss-corrected modeling approach to provide a more accurate estimate of seabird mortalities in pelagic longline fisheries. Where possible, fishery-specific seabird bycatch loss rates need to be ascertained via specific set and haul observing protocols. But, even where fishery-specific estimates for a region are not available, the methodology developed here is applicable to other pelagic longline fisheries to approximate fleet-level loss-corrected bycatch. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles PLOS ONE 14 8 e0220797
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Can Zhou
Yan Jiao
Joan Browder
How much do we know about seabird bycatch in pelagic longline fisheries? A simulation study on the potential bias caused by the usually unobserved portion of seabird bycatch.
topic_facet Medicine
R
Science
Q
description Not much is known about the fleet level total seabird bycatch from pelagic longlines of United States vessels in the western North Atlantic or other fleets of the Atlantic or other oceans. Onboard observers generally only record seabird bycatch during line hauling. Seabirds are predominantly caught during the line setting stage, and, due to predation or mechanical action, those caught prior to the haul can drop off the hook and be lost to the onboard observer. We developed a model to gauge the size of this bycatch loss problem and provide a first approximation of its impact on estimates of total fleet bycatch. We started with a traditional loss-free bycatch model, which assumes that birds recorded were the only birds captured, and integrated into it two crucial components of the bycatch process: capture origin (set or haul) and bycatch loss of set-captures. We extracted count data on seabird bycatch loss and bycatch mortality from the literature on other longline fisheries and used these data to simulate potential total seabird bycatch in the western North Atlantic. Simulations revealed the shortcomings of both the traditional bycatch model and the current haul-only observer protocol, each of which contributed to biologically significant underestimation of total bycatch and estimation uncertainty. Based on our results, we recommend a loss-corrected modeling approach to provide a more accurate estimate of seabird mortalities in pelagic longline fisheries. Where possible, fishery-specific seabird bycatch loss rates need to be ascertained via specific set and haul observing protocols. But, even where fishery-specific estimates for a region are not available, the methodology developed here is applicable to other pelagic longline fisheries to approximate fleet-level loss-corrected bycatch.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Can Zhou
Yan Jiao
Joan Browder
author_facet Can Zhou
Yan Jiao
Joan Browder
author_sort Can Zhou
title How much do we know about seabird bycatch in pelagic longline fisheries? A simulation study on the potential bias caused by the usually unobserved portion of seabird bycatch.
title_short How much do we know about seabird bycatch in pelagic longline fisheries? A simulation study on the potential bias caused by the usually unobserved portion of seabird bycatch.
title_full How much do we know about seabird bycatch in pelagic longline fisheries? A simulation study on the potential bias caused by the usually unobserved portion of seabird bycatch.
title_fullStr How much do we know about seabird bycatch in pelagic longline fisheries? A simulation study on the potential bias caused by the usually unobserved portion of seabird bycatch.
title_full_unstemmed How much do we know about seabird bycatch in pelagic longline fisheries? A simulation study on the potential bias caused by the usually unobserved portion of seabird bycatch.
title_sort how much do we know about seabird bycatch in pelagic longline fisheries? a simulation study on the potential bias caused by the usually unobserved portion of seabird bycatch.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220797
https://doaj.org/article/7dcec64c7f5a4ea7bca513c4da89c9d9
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source PLoS ONE, Vol 14, Iss 8, p e0220797 (2019)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220797
https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203
1932-6203
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220797
https://doaj.org/article/7dcec64c7f5a4ea7bca513c4da89c9d9
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220797
container_title PLOS ONE
container_volume 14
container_issue 8
container_start_page e0220797
_version_ 1766130035518865408