Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements

The AERONET (Aerosol Robotic Network) global network provides estimations of broadband solar radiative fluxes at the surface and at the TOA (Top-Of-the-Atmosphere). This paper reports on the validation of AERONET flux estimations at the TOA with the CERES (Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy Syste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Author: Michaël Sicard
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019
Subjects:
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11182168
https://doaj.org/article/7d70df39999c46e886921d3197deabb4
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:7d70df39999c46e886921d3197deabb4
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:7d70df39999c46e886921d3197deabb4 2023-05-15T13:06:20+02:00 Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements Michaël Sicard 2019-09-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11182168 https://doaj.org/article/7d70df39999c46e886921d3197deabb4 EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/18/2168 https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 2072-4292 doi:10.3390/rs11182168 https://doaj.org/article/7d70df39999c46e886921d3197deabb4 Remote Sensing, Vol 11, Iss 18, p 2168 (2019) Top-Of-the-Atmosphere (TOA) upward solar fluxes AERONET CERES flux comparison Science Q article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11182168 2022-12-31T15:24:09Z The AERONET (Aerosol Robotic Network) global network provides estimations of broadband solar radiative fluxes at the surface and at the TOA (Top-Of-the-Atmosphere). This paper reports on the validation of AERONET flux estimations at the TOA with the CERES (Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System) instrument. The validation was made at eight AERONET sites worldwide with at least seven years of Level 2.0 and Version 3 data and representatives of mineral dust, biomass burning, background continental, and urban-industrial aerosol regimes. To co-locate in time and space the AERONET and CERES fluxes, several criteria based on time and distance differences and cloud coverage were defined. When the strictest criterion was applied to all sites, the linear relationship between the observed and estimated fluxes (y = 1.04x – 3.67 Wm −2 ) was very close to the 1:1 ideal line. The correlation coefficient was 0.96 and nearly all points were contained in the ±15% region around the 1:1 line. The average flux difference was –2.52 Wm −2 (–0.84% in relative terms). AERONET overestimations were observed at two sites and were correlated with large aerosol optical depth (AOD) (>0.2) Underestimations were observed at one desert site and were correlated with large surface albedos (>0.2). Article in Journal/Newspaper Aerosol Robotic Network Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Remote Sensing 11 18 2168
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Top-Of-the-Atmosphere (TOA) upward solar fluxes
AERONET
CERES
flux comparison
Science
Q
spellingShingle Top-Of-the-Atmosphere (TOA) upward solar fluxes
AERONET
CERES
flux comparison
Science
Q
Michaël Sicard
Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements
topic_facet Top-Of-the-Atmosphere (TOA) upward solar fluxes
AERONET
CERES
flux comparison
Science
Q
description The AERONET (Aerosol Robotic Network) global network provides estimations of broadband solar radiative fluxes at the surface and at the TOA (Top-Of-the-Atmosphere). This paper reports on the validation of AERONET flux estimations at the TOA with the CERES (Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System) instrument. The validation was made at eight AERONET sites worldwide with at least seven years of Level 2.0 and Version 3 data and representatives of mineral dust, biomass burning, background continental, and urban-industrial aerosol regimes. To co-locate in time and space the AERONET and CERES fluxes, several criteria based on time and distance differences and cloud coverage were defined. When the strictest criterion was applied to all sites, the linear relationship between the observed and estimated fluxes (y = 1.04x – 3.67 Wm −2 ) was very close to the 1:1 ideal line. The correlation coefficient was 0.96 and nearly all points were contained in the ±15% region around the 1:1 line. The average flux difference was –2.52 Wm −2 (–0.84% in relative terms). AERONET overestimations were observed at two sites and were correlated with large aerosol optical depth (AOD) (>0.2) Underestimations were observed at one desert site and were correlated with large surface albedos (>0.2).
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Michaël Sicard
author_facet Michaël Sicard
author_sort Michaël Sicard
title Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements
title_short Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements
title_full Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements
title_fullStr Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements
title_sort validation of aeronet-estimated upward broadband solar fluxes at the top-of-the-atmosphere with ceres measurements
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11182168
https://doaj.org/article/7d70df39999c46e886921d3197deabb4
genre Aerosol Robotic Network
genre_facet Aerosol Robotic Network
op_source Remote Sensing, Vol 11, Iss 18, p 2168 (2019)
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/18/2168
https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292
2072-4292
doi:10.3390/rs11182168
https://doaj.org/article/7d70df39999c46e886921d3197deabb4
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11182168
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 11
container_issue 18
container_start_page 2168
_version_ 1766001152265027584