Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data

This paper summarises the validation of GOME total ozone retrieved using the Weighting Function Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (WFDOAS) algorithm Version 1.0. This algorithm has been described in detail in a companion paper by Coldewey-Egbers et al. (2005). Compared to the operational...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Weber, L. N. Lamsal, M. Coldewey-Egbers, K. Bramstedt, J. P. Burrows
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/7c2bbe54e87f4a91b5b1cfa2454f91bc
_version_ 1821688035224322048
author M. Weber
L. N. Lamsal
M. Coldewey-Egbers
K. Bramstedt
J. P. Burrows
author_facet M. Weber
L. N. Lamsal
M. Coldewey-Egbers
K. Bramstedt
J. P. Burrows
author_sort M. Weber
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
description This paper summarises the validation of GOME total ozone retrieved using the Weighting Function Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (WFDOAS) algorithm Version 1.0. This algorithm has been described in detail in a companion paper by Coldewey-Egbers et al. (2005). Compared to the operational GDP (GOME Data Processor) V3, several improvements to the total ozone retrieval have been introduced that account for the varying ozone dependent contribution to rotational Raman scattering, includes a new cloud scheme, and uses the GOME measured effective albedo in the retrieval. In this paper the WFDOAS results have been compared with selected ground-based measurements from the WOUDC (World Ozone and UV Radiation Data Centre) that collects total ozone measurements from a global network of stations covering all seasons. From the global validation excellent agreement between WFDOAS and ground data was observed. The agreement lies within ±1%, and very little seasonal variations in the differences are found. In the polar regions and at high solar zenith angles, however, a positive bias varying between 5 and 8% is found near the polar night period. As a function of solar zenith angle as well as of the retrieved total ozone, the WFDOAS differences to ground polar data, however, show a much weaker dependence as compared to the operational GOME Data Processor Version3 of GOME that represents a significant improvement. Very few stations carry out simultaneous measurements by Brewer and Dobson spectrometers over an extended period (three years or more). Simultaneous Brewer and Dobson measurements from Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic (50.2N, 15.8E) and Hohenpeissenberg, Germany (47.8N, 11.0E) covering the period 1996-1999 have been compared with our GOME results. Agreement with Brewers are generally better than with the simultaneous Dobson measurements and this may be explained by the neglect of stratospheric (ozone) temperature correction in the standard ozone retrieval from the ground.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre polar night
genre_facet polar night
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:7c2bbe54e87f4a91b5b1cfa2454f91bc
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
op_relation http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1341/2005/acp-5-1341-2005.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7316
https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7324
1680-7316
1680-7324
https://doaj.org/article/7c2bbe54e87f4a91b5b1cfa2454f91bc
op_source Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol 5, Iss 5, Pp 1341-1355 (2005)
publishDate 2005
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:7c2bbe54e87f4a91b5b1cfa2454f91bc 2025-01-17T00:23:05+00:00 Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data M. Weber L. N. Lamsal M. Coldewey-Egbers K. Bramstedt J. P. Burrows 2005-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/7c2bbe54e87f4a91b5b1cfa2454f91bc EN eng Copernicus Publications http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1341/2005/acp-5-1341-2005.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7316 https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7324 1680-7316 1680-7324 https://doaj.org/article/7c2bbe54e87f4a91b5b1cfa2454f91bc Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol 5, Iss 5, Pp 1341-1355 (2005) Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999 article 2005 ftdoajarticles 2022-12-31T14:53:37Z This paper summarises the validation of GOME total ozone retrieved using the Weighting Function Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (WFDOAS) algorithm Version 1.0. This algorithm has been described in detail in a companion paper by Coldewey-Egbers et al. (2005). Compared to the operational GDP (GOME Data Processor) V3, several improvements to the total ozone retrieval have been introduced that account for the varying ozone dependent contribution to rotational Raman scattering, includes a new cloud scheme, and uses the GOME measured effective albedo in the retrieval. In this paper the WFDOAS results have been compared with selected ground-based measurements from the WOUDC (World Ozone and UV Radiation Data Centre) that collects total ozone measurements from a global network of stations covering all seasons. From the global validation excellent agreement between WFDOAS and ground data was observed. The agreement lies within ±1%, and very little seasonal variations in the differences are found. In the polar regions and at high solar zenith angles, however, a positive bias varying between 5 and 8% is found near the polar night period. As a function of solar zenith angle as well as of the retrieved total ozone, the WFDOAS differences to ground polar data, however, show a much weaker dependence as compared to the operational GOME Data Processor Version3 of GOME that represents a significant improvement. Very few stations carry out simultaneous measurements by Brewer and Dobson spectrometers over an extended period (three years or more). Simultaneous Brewer and Dobson measurements from Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic (50.2N, 15.8E) and Hohenpeissenberg, Germany (47.8N, 11.0E) covering the period 1996-1999 have been compared with our GOME results. Agreement with Brewers are generally better than with the simultaneous Dobson measurements and this may be explained by the neglect of stratospheric (ozone) temperature correction in the standard ozone retrieval from the ground. Article in Journal/Newspaper polar night Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
spellingShingle Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
M. Weber
L. N. Lamsal
M. Coldewey-Egbers
K. Bramstedt
J. P. Burrows
Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data
title Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data
title_full Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data
title_fullStr Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data
title_full_unstemmed Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data
title_short Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data
title_sort pole-to-pole validation of gome wfdoas total ozone with groundbased data
topic Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
topic_facet Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
url https://doaj.org/article/7c2bbe54e87f4a91b5b1cfa2454f91bc