Early unusual ozone loss during the Arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other winters

Ozone loss during the winter 2002/2003 has been evaluated from comparisons between total ozone reported by the SAOZ network and simulated in passive mode by both REPROBUS and SLIMCAT. Despite the fact that the two models have a different approach to calculate the descent inside vortex, both evaluati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. Goutail, J.-P. Pommereau, F. Lefèvre, M. van Roozendael, S. B. Andersen, B.-A. Kåstad Høiskar, V. Dorokhov, E. Kyrö, M. P. Chipperfield, W. Feng
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/79ffc6d82bfa41f386df2c25f4333bb6
_version_ 1821834076174155776
author F. Goutail
J.-P. Pommereau
F. Lefèvre
M. van Roozendael
S. B. Andersen
B.-A. Kåstad Høiskar
V. Dorokhov
E. Kyrö
M. P. Chipperfield
W. Feng
author_facet F. Goutail
J.-P. Pommereau
F. Lefèvre
M. van Roozendael
S. B. Andersen
B.-A. Kåstad Høiskar
V. Dorokhov
E. Kyrö
M. P. Chipperfield
W. Feng
author_sort F. Goutail
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
description Ozone loss during the winter 2002/2003 has been evaluated from comparisons between total ozone reported by the SAOZ network and simulated in passive mode by both REPROBUS and SLIMCAT. Despite the fact that the two models have a different approach to calculate the descent inside vortex, both evaluations provide similar results 18±4% using REPROBUS and 20±4% using SLIMCAT and show that the loss started around mid-December, at least ten to twenty days earlier than during any of the previous eleven winters, except 1993/1994. This unusual behaviour is consistent with the low temperatures reported in the stratosphere as well to the signature of early chlorine activation indicated by ground-based, balloon and satellite observations. A significant ozone loss is also simulated by the current versions of two models, but of lesser amplitude compared to SAOZ, 13±2% for REPROBUS and 16±2% for SLIMCAT, the underestimation being already observed by mid-January. The early ozone depletion captured by both model show that chemical depletion did indeed take place in December, predominantly at the illuminated edge of the distorted vortex, but the reason for the underestimation compared to the observations and the differences among the models have still to be investigated.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:79ffc6d82bfa41f386df2c25f4333bb6
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
op_relation http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/665/2005/acp-5-665-2005.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7316
https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7324
1680-7316
1680-7324
https://doaj.org/article/79ffc6d82bfa41f386df2c25f4333bb6
op_source Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol 5, Iss 3, Pp 665-677 (2005)
publishDate 2005
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:79ffc6d82bfa41f386df2c25f4333bb6 2025-01-16T20:39:19+00:00 Early unusual ozone loss during the Arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other winters F. Goutail J.-P. Pommereau F. Lefèvre M. van Roozendael S. B. Andersen B.-A. Kåstad Høiskar V. Dorokhov E. Kyrö M. P. Chipperfield W. Feng 2005-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/79ffc6d82bfa41f386df2c25f4333bb6 EN eng Copernicus Publications http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/665/2005/acp-5-665-2005.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7316 https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7324 1680-7316 1680-7324 https://doaj.org/article/79ffc6d82bfa41f386df2c25f4333bb6 Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol 5, Iss 3, Pp 665-677 (2005) Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999 article 2005 ftdoajarticles 2022-12-30T21:53:48Z Ozone loss during the winter 2002/2003 has been evaluated from comparisons between total ozone reported by the SAOZ network and simulated in passive mode by both REPROBUS and SLIMCAT. Despite the fact that the two models have a different approach to calculate the descent inside vortex, both evaluations provide similar results 18±4% using REPROBUS and 20±4% using SLIMCAT and show that the loss started around mid-December, at least ten to twenty days earlier than during any of the previous eleven winters, except 1993/1994. This unusual behaviour is consistent with the low temperatures reported in the stratosphere as well to the signature of early chlorine activation indicated by ground-based, balloon and satellite observations. A significant ozone loss is also simulated by the current versions of two models, but of lesser amplitude compared to SAOZ, 13±2% for REPROBUS and 16±2% for SLIMCAT, the underestimation being already observed by mid-January. The early ozone depletion captured by both model show that chemical depletion did indeed take place in December, predominantly at the illuminated edge of the distorted vortex, but the reason for the underestimation compared to the observations and the differences among the models have still to be investigated. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic
spellingShingle Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
F. Goutail
J.-P. Pommereau
F. Lefèvre
M. van Roozendael
S. B. Andersen
B.-A. Kåstad Høiskar
V. Dorokhov
E. Kyrö
M. P. Chipperfield
W. Feng
Early unusual ozone loss during the Arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other winters
title Early unusual ozone loss during the Arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other winters
title_full Early unusual ozone loss during the Arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other winters
title_fullStr Early unusual ozone loss during the Arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other winters
title_full_unstemmed Early unusual ozone loss during the Arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other winters
title_short Early unusual ozone loss during the Arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other winters
title_sort early unusual ozone loss during the arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other winters
topic Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
topic_facet Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
url https://doaj.org/article/79ffc6d82bfa41f386df2c25f4333bb6