‘We spray and walk away’: wall modifications decrease the impact of indoor residual spray campaigns through reductions in post-spray coverage

Abstract Malaria prevalence has significantly reduced since 2000, largely due to the scale-up of vector control interventions, mainly indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs). Given their success, these tools remain the frontline interventions in the fight aga...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Malaria Journal
Main Authors: Mercy A. Opiyo, Krijn P. Paaijmans
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3102-6
https://doaj.org/article/757baa0a84814245bbcd8b1bfc412cfb
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:757baa0a84814245bbcd8b1bfc412cfb
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:757baa0a84814245bbcd8b1bfc412cfb 2023-05-15T15:09:15+02:00 ‘We spray and walk away’: wall modifications decrease the impact of indoor residual spray campaigns through reductions in post-spray coverage Mercy A. Opiyo Krijn P. Paaijmans 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3102-6 https://doaj.org/article/757baa0a84814245bbcd8b1bfc412cfb EN eng BMC https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3102-6 https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2875 doi:10.1186/s12936-020-3102-6 1475-2875 https://doaj.org/article/757baa0a84814245bbcd8b1bfc412cfb Malaria Journal, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2020) Insecticide Wall modification Residual efficacy Communities Vector control Compliance Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3102-6 2022-12-31T04:50:17Z Abstract Malaria prevalence has significantly reduced since 2000, largely due to the scale-up of vector control interventions, mainly indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs). Given their success, these tools remain the frontline interventions in the fight against malaria. Their effectiveness relies on three key ingredients: the intervention, the mosquito vector and the end-user. Regarding the intervention, factors such as the insecticide active ingredient(s) used and the durability and/or bio-efficacy of the tool over time are critical. For the vectors, these factors include biting and resting behaviours and the susceptibility to insecticides. Finally, the end-users need to accept and properly use the intervention. Whilst human attitude and behaviour towards LLINs are well-documented both during and after distribution, only initial coverage is monitored for IRS and in a few geographic settings the residual efficacy of the used product. Here, the historical evidence on end-users modifying their wall surfaces post-spraying is presented, a behaviour that has the potential to reduce actual IRS coverage, effectiveness and impact, as fewer people are truly protected. Therefore, clear guidelines on how to monitor IRS acceptability and/or coverage, both before, during and after spraying, are urgently needed as part of the Monitoring and Evaluation of malaria programmes. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Malaria Journal 19 1
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Insecticide
Wall modification
Residual efficacy
Communities
Vector control
Compliance
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
spellingShingle Insecticide
Wall modification
Residual efficacy
Communities
Vector control
Compliance
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Mercy A. Opiyo
Krijn P. Paaijmans
‘We spray and walk away’: wall modifications decrease the impact of indoor residual spray campaigns through reductions in post-spray coverage
topic_facet Insecticide
Wall modification
Residual efficacy
Communities
Vector control
Compliance
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
description Abstract Malaria prevalence has significantly reduced since 2000, largely due to the scale-up of vector control interventions, mainly indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs). Given their success, these tools remain the frontline interventions in the fight against malaria. Their effectiveness relies on three key ingredients: the intervention, the mosquito vector and the end-user. Regarding the intervention, factors such as the insecticide active ingredient(s) used and the durability and/or bio-efficacy of the tool over time are critical. For the vectors, these factors include biting and resting behaviours and the susceptibility to insecticides. Finally, the end-users need to accept and properly use the intervention. Whilst human attitude and behaviour towards LLINs are well-documented both during and after distribution, only initial coverage is monitored for IRS and in a few geographic settings the residual efficacy of the used product. Here, the historical evidence on end-users modifying their wall surfaces post-spraying is presented, a behaviour that has the potential to reduce actual IRS coverage, effectiveness and impact, as fewer people are truly protected. Therefore, clear guidelines on how to monitor IRS acceptability and/or coverage, both before, during and after spraying, are urgently needed as part of the Monitoring and Evaluation of malaria programmes.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Mercy A. Opiyo
Krijn P. Paaijmans
author_facet Mercy A. Opiyo
Krijn P. Paaijmans
author_sort Mercy A. Opiyo
title ‘We spray and walk away’: wall modifications decrease the impact of indoor residual spray campaigns through reductions in post-spray coverage
title_short ‘We spray and walk away’: wall modifications decrease the impact of indoor residual spray campaigns through reductions in post-spray coverage
title_full ‘We spray and walk away’: wall modifications decrease the impact of indoor residual spray campaigns through reductions in post-spray coverage
title_fullStr ‘We spray and walk away’: wall modifications decrease the impact of indoor residual spray campaigns through reductions in post-spray coverage
title_full_unstemmed ‘We spray and walk away’: wall modifications decrease the impact of indoor residual spray campaigns through reductions in post-spray coverage
title_sort ‘we spray and walk away’: wall modifications decrease the impact of indoor residual spray campaigns through reductions in post-spray coverage
publisher BMC
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3102-6
https://doaj.org/article/757baa0a84814245bbcd8b1bfc412cfb
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Malaria Journal, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2020)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3102-6
https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2875
doi:10.1186/s12936-020-3102-6
1475-2875
https://doaj.org/article/757baa0a84814245bbcd8b1bfc412cfb
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3102-6
container_title Malaria Journal
container_volume 19
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766340471522590720