‘We spray and walk away’: wall modifications decrease the impact of indoor residual spray campaigns through reductions in post-spray coverage
Abstract Malaria prevalence has significantly reduced since 2000, largely due to the scale-up of vector control interventions, mainly indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs). Given their success, these tools remain the frontline interventions in the fight aga...
Published in: | Malaria Journal |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3102-6 https://doaj.org/article/757baa0a84814245bbcd8b1bfc412cfb |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:757baa0a84814245bbcd8b1bfc412cfb |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:757baa0a84814245bbcd8b1bfc412cfb 2023-05-15T15:09:15+02:00 ‘We spray and walk away’: wall modifications decrease the impact of indoor residual spray campaigns through reductions in post-spray coverage Mercy A. Opiyo Krijn P. Paaijmans 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3102-6 https://doaj.org/article/757baa0a84814245bbcd8b1bfc412cfb EN eng BMC https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3102-6 https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2875 doi:10.1186/s12936-020-3102-6 1475-2875 https://doaj.org/article/757baa0a84814245bbcd8b1bfc412cfb Malaria Journal, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2020) Insecticide Wall modification Residual efficacy Communities Vector control Compliance Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3102-6 2022-12-31T04:50:17Z Abstract Malaria prevalence has significantly reduced since 2000, largely due to the scale-up of vector control interventions, mainly indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs). Given their success, these tools remain the frontline interventions in the fight against malaria. Their effectiveness relies on three key ingredients: the intervention, the mosquito vector and the end-user. Regarding the intervention, factors such as the insecticide active ingredient(s) used and the durability and/or bio-efficacy of the tool over time are critical. For the vectors, these factors include biting and resting behaviours and the susceptibility to insecticides. Finally, the end-users need to accept and properly use the intervention. Whilst human attitude and behaviour towards LLINs are well-documented both during and after distribution, only initial coverage is monitored for IRS and in a few geographic settings the residual efficacy of the used product. Here, the historical evidence on end-users modifying their wall surfaces post-spraying is presented, a behaviour that has the potential to reduce actual IRS coverage, effectiveness and impact, as fewer people are truly protected. Therefore, clear guidelines on how to monitor IRS acceptability and/or coverage, both before, during and after spraying, are urgently needed as part of the Monitoring and Evaluation of malaria programmes. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Malaria Journal 19 1 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
Insecticide Wall modification Residual efficacy Communities Vector control Compliance Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 |
spellingShingle |
Insecticide Wall modification Residual efficacy Communities Vector control Compliance Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 Mercy A. Opiyo Krijn P. Paaijmans ‘We spray and walk away’: wall modifications decrease the impact of indoor residual spray campaigns through reductions in post-spray coverage |
topic_facet |
Insecticide Wall modification Residual efficacy Communities Vector control Compliance Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 |
description |
Abstract Malaria prevalence has significantly reduced since 2000, largely due to the scale-up of vector control interventions, mainly indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs). Given their success, these tools remain the frontline interventions in the fight against malaria. Their effectiveness relies on three key ingredients: the intervention, the mosquito vector and the end-user. Regarding the intervention, factors such as the insecticide active ingredient(s) used and the durability and/or bio-efficacy of the tool over time are critical. For the vectors, these factors include biting and resting behaviours and the susceptibility to insecticides. Finally, the end-users need to accept and properly use the intervention. Whilst human attitude and behaviour towards LLINs are well-documented both during and after distribution, only initial coverage is monitored for IRS and in a few geographic settings the residual efficacy of the used product. Here, the historical evidence on end-users modifying their wall surfaces post-spraying is presented, a behaviour that has the potential to reduce actual IRS coverage, effectiveness and impact, as fewer people are truly protected. Therefore, clear guidelines on how to monitor IRS acceptability and/or coverage, both before, during and after spraying, are urgently needed as part of the Monitoring and Evaluation of malaria programmes. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Mercy A. Opiyo Krijn P. Paaijmans |
author_facet |
Mercy A. Opiyo Krijn P. Paaijmans |
author_sort |
Mercy A. Opiyo |
title |
‘We spray and walk away’: wall modifications decrease the impact of indoor residual spray campaigns through reductions in post-spray coverage |
title_short |
‘We spray and walk away’: wall modifications decrease the impact of indoor residual spray campaigns through reductions in post-spray coverage |
title_full |
‘We spray and walk away’: wall modifications decrease the impact of indoor residual spray campaigns through reductions in post-spray coverage |
title_fullStr |
‘We spray and walk away’: wall modifications decrease the impact of indoor residual spray campaigns through reductions in post-spray coverage |
title_full_unstemmed |
‘We spray and walk away’: wall modifications decrease the impact of indoor residual spray campaigns through reductions in post-spray coverage |
title_sort |
‘we spray and walk away’: wall modifications decrease the impact of indoor residual spray campaigns through reductions in post-spray coverage |
publisher |
BMC |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3102-6 https://doaj.org/article/757baa0a84814245bbcd8b1bfc412cfb |
geographic |
Arctic |
geographic_facet |
Arctic |
genre |
Arctic |
genre_facet |
Arctic |
op_source |
Malaria Journal, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2020) |
op_relation |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3102-6 https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2875 doi:10.1186/s12936-020-3102-6 1475-2875 https://doaj.org/article/757baa0a84814245bbcd8b1bfc412cfb |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3102-6 |
container_title |
Malaria Journal |
container_volume |
19 |
container_issue |
1 |
_version_ |
1766340471522590720 |