Economic practices of peoples of the Republic of Khakassia in present-day conditions

In today’s limited conditions of the Russian rural labour market, the role of economic activity of the population as an additional or even the main means of subsistence gains an increasing importance. This problem is relevant for people who live primarily in rural areas. The specifics of the existin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Historical Ethnology
Main Author: Olga L. Lushnikova
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Russian
Tatar
Published: Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, Marjani Institute of History 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2024-9-2.249-261
https://doaj.org/article/749fc652b15c4f31b9929062e8d4fa2f
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:749fc652b15c4f31b9929062e8d4fa2f
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:749fc652b15c4f31b9929062e8d4fa2f 2024-09-15T18:38:44+00:00 Economic practices of peoples of the Republic of Khakassia in present-day conditions Olga L. Lushnikova 2024-07-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2024-9-2.249-261 https://doaj.org/article/749fc652b15c4f31b9929062e8d4fa2f EN RU TT eng rus tat Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, Marjani Institute of History https://historicalethnology.org/news/en-2024-t9-n2-9/ https://doaj.org/toc/2619-1636 doi:10.22378/he.2024-9-2.249-261 2619-1636 https://doaj.org/article/749fc652b15c4f31b9929062e8d4fa2f Историческая этнология, Vol 9, Iss 2, Pp 249-261 (2024) ethno-economics ethnic economy ethnoeconomical way of life traditional economic way of life economic behavior livestock crafts Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology GN301-674 Folklore GR1-950 Human ecology. Anthropogeography GF1-900 article 2024 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2024-9-2.249-261 2024-08-26T15:21:16Z In today’s limited conditions of the Russian rural labour market, the role of economic activity of the population as an additional or even the main means of subsistence gains an increasing importance. This problem is relevant for people who live primarily in rural areas. The specifics of the existing management of local ethnic communities are established in the culture and presented in the form of ethno-economic structures. Today, their preservation and development is considered to be an opportunity for the growth of regional economies. To what extent have peoples preserved elements of the traditional economic structure at the present stage? The given study was conducted in the Republic of Khakassia, where the Khakass (the titular ethnic group of the republic), the Shors (small-numbered indigenous people), and the Russians (the ethnic majority in the region) live. The article compares the economic practices of these ethnic communities. The results of the study showed that indigenous peoples retain their orientation towards traditional types of economic activities. Khakassians are actively involved in livestock breeding. Compared to Russians and Shors, they have a more numerous and more varied livestock farmstead. Shors are focused primarily on wild capture activities; for many, it is the main type of employment. Russians are less involved in economic activities, but in villages where the Khakass population predominates, they keep a lot of livestock. They are less inclined to consider economic activity as a significant source. Khakassians are oriented towards economic activity; they mainly associate their life strategies with the village. Shors try to preserve traditional crafts, which are the most accessible source of subsistence for them in taiga conditions. In the current conditions, it is difficult to talk about the significant influence of the ethno-economic structures of indigenous peoples on the development of the economy of Khakassia, since these ethnic groups constitute a numerical minority on the ... Article in Journal/Newspaper taiga Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Historical Ethnology 9 2 249 261
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
Russian
Tatar
topic ethno-economics
ethnic economy
ethnoeconomical way of life
traditional economic way of life
economic behavior
livestock
crafts
Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology
GN301-674
Folklore
GR1-950
Human ecology. Anthropogeography
GF1-900
spellingShingle ethno-economics
ethnic economy
ethnoeconomical way of life
traditional economic way of life
economic behavior
livestock
crafts
Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology
GN301-674
Folklore
GR1-950
Human ecology. Anthropogeography
GF1-900
Olga L. Lushnikova
Economic practices of peoples of the Republic of Khakassia in present-day conditions
topic_facet ethno-economics
ethnic economy
ethnoeconomical way of life
traditional economic way of life
economic behavior
livestock
crafts
Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology
GN301-674
Folklore
GR1-950
Human ecology. Anthropogeography
GF1-900
description In today’s limited conditions of the Russian rural labour market, the role of economic activity of the population as an additional or even the main means of subsistence gains an increasing importance. This problem is relevant for people who live primarily in rural areas. The specifics of the existing management of local ethnic communities are established in the culture and presented in the form of ethno-economic structures. Today, their preservation and development is considered to be an opportunity for the growth of regional economies. To what extent have peoples preserved elements of the traditional economic structure at the present stage? The given study was conducted in the Republic of Khakassia, where the Khakass (the titular ethnic group of the republic), the Shors (small-numbered indigenous people), and the Russians (the ethnic majority in the region) live. The article compares the economic practices of these ethnic communities. The results of the study showed that indigenous peoples retain their orientation towards traditional types of economic activities. Khakassians are actively involved in livestock breeding. Compared to Russians and Shors, they have a more numerous and more varied livestock farmstead. Shors are focused primarily on wild capture activities; for many, it is the main type of employment. Russians are less involved in economic activities, but in villages where the Khakass population predominates, they keep a lot of livestock. They are less inclined to consider economic activity as a significant source. Khakassians are oriented towards economic activity; they mainly associate their life strategies with the village. Shors try to preserve traditional crafts, which are the most accessible source of subsistence for them in taiga conditions. In the current conditions, it is difficult to talk about the significant influence of the ethno-economic structures of indigenous peoples on the development of the economy of Khakassia, since these ethnic groups constitute a numerical minority on the ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Olga L. Lushnikova
author_facet Olga L. Lushnikova
author_sort Olga L. Lushnikova
title Economic practices of peoples of the Republic of Khakassia in present-day conditions
title_short Economic practices of peoples of the Republic of Khakassia in present-day conditions
title_full Economic practices of peoples of the Republic of Khakassia in present-day conditions
title_fullStr Economic practices of peoples of the Republic of Khakassia in present-day conditions
title_full_unstemmed Economic practices of peoples of the Republic of Khakassia in present-day conditions
title_sort economic practices of peoples of the republic of khakassia in present-day conditions
publisher Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, Marjani Institute of History
publishDate 2024
url https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2024-9-2.249-261
https://doaj.org/article/749fc652b15c4f31b9929062e8d4fa2f
genre taiga
genre_facet taiga
op_source Историческая этнология, Vol 9, Iss 2, Pp 249-261 (2024)
op_relation https://historicalethnology.org/news/en-2024-t9-n2-9/
https://doaj.org/toc/2619-1636
doi:10.22378/he.2024-9-2.249-261
2619-1636
https://doaj.org/article/749fc652b15c4f31b9929062e8d4fa2f
op_doi https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2024-9-2.249-261
container_title Historical Ethnology
container_volume 9
container_issue 2
container_start_page 249
op_container_end_page 261
_version_ 1810483126021914624