Russia’s Security Perceptions and Arctic Governance

Russia’s war in Ukraine further strained Russia’s relations with the West and negatively influenced Arctic regional governance, especially after seven members of the Arctic Council paused cooperation with Russia. The rationale of the suspension was to express disapproval by seven Arctic states of Ru...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Politics and Governance
Main Author: Angela Borozna
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7313
https://doaj.org/article/7274a37c34304f749fce26dbb76d2bf8
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:7274a37c34304f749fce26dbb76d2bf8
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:7274a37c34304f749fce26dbb76d2bf8 2024-02-11T09:59:52+01:00 Russia’s Security Perceptions and Arctic Governance Angela Borozna 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7313 https://doaj.org/article/7274a37c34304f749fce26dbb76d2bf8 EN eng Cogitatio https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7313 https://doaj.org/toc/2183-2463 2183-2463 doi:10.17645/pag.7313 https://doaj.org/article/7274a37c34304f749fce26dbb76d2bf8 Politics and Governance, Vol 12, Iss 0 (2024) arctic council arctic governance economic security militarization military security northern sea route russia security threat perception Political science (General) JA1-92 article 2024 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7313 2024-01-21T01:40:36Z Russia’s war in Ukraine further strained Russia’s relations with the West and negatively influenced Arctic regional governance, especially after seven members of the Arctic Council paused cooperation with Russia. The rationale of the suspension was to express disapproval by seven Arctic states of Russia’s aggression in Ukraine. However, the suspension of cooperation with Russia within the Arctic Council format prompted some observers to question the relevance and utility of the institution. Russia never expressed its wish to leave the Council and continues to express its desire for multilateral cooperation in the region. This raises the question: Can Russia’s assertive stance in Ukraine coexist with peaceful cooperation in the Arctic? In order to answer this question, this article addresses the following questions: How does the geopolitical tension shape Russia’s approach to Arctic governance? And what is the role of military and economic security in Russia’s Arctic policy? The article uses a comparative method combined with discourse analysis to establish a change in Russia’s view on Arctic governance before and after the war in Ukraine. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Council Arctic Northern Sea Route Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Politics and Governance 12
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic arctic council
arctic governance
economic security
militarization
military security
northern sea route
russia
security
threat perception
Political science (General)
JA1-92
spellingShingle arctic council
arctic governance
economic security
militarization
military security
northern sea route
russia
security
threat perception
Political science (General)
JA1-92
Angela Borozna
Russia’s Security Perceptions and Arctic Governance
topic_facet arctic council
arctic governance
economic security
militarization
military security
northern sea route
russia
security
threat perception
Political science (General)
JA1-92
description Russia’s war in Ukraine further strained Russia’s relations with the West and negatively influenced Arctic regional governance, especially after seven members of the Arctic Council paused cooperation with Russia. The rationale of the suspension was to express disapproval by seven Arctic states of Russia’s aggression in Ukraine. However, the suspension of cooperation with Russia within the Arctic Council format prompted some observers to question the relevance and utility of the institution. Russia never expressed its wish to leave the Council and continues to express its desire for multilateral cooperation in the region. This raises the question: Can Russia’s assertive stance in Ukraine coexist with peaceful cooperation in the Arctic? In order to answer this question, this article addresses the following questions: How does the geopolitical tension shape Russia’s approach to Arctic governance? And what is the role of military and economic security in Russia’s Arctic policy? The article uses a comparative method combined with discourse analysis to establish a change in Russia’s view on Arctic governance before and after the war in Ukraine.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Angela Borozna
author_facet Angela Borozna
author_sort Angela Borozna
title Russia’s Security Perceptions and Arctic Governance
title_short Russia’s Security Perceptions and Arctic Governance
title_full Russia’s Security Perceptions and Arctic Governance
title_fullStr Russia’s Security Perceptions and Arctic Governance
title_full_unstemmed Russia’s Security Perceptions and Arctic Governance
title_sort russia’s security perceptions and arctic governance
publisher Cogitatio
publishDate 2024
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7313
https://doaj.org/article/7274a37c34304f749fce26dbb76d2bf8
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic Council
Arctic
Northern Sea Route
genre_facet Arctic Council
Arctic
Northern Sea Route
op_source Politics and Governance, Vol 12, Iss 0 (2024)
op_relation https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7313
https://doaj.org/toc/2183-2463
2183-2463
doi:10.17645/pag.7313
https://doaj.org/article/7274a37c34304f749fce26dbb76d2bf8
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7313
container_title Politics and Governance
container_volume 12
_version_ 1790595600338649088