Investigation of Polarimetric Decomposition for Arctic Summer Sea Ice Classification Using Gaofen-3 Fully Polarimetric SAR Data

• Published in: IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
• Main Authors: Lian He, Xiyi He, Fengming Hui, Yufang Ye, Tianyu Zhang, Xiao Cheng
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: IEEE 2022
• Subjects: Arctic sea ice; Gaofen-3; polarimetric decomposition; polarimetric synthetic aperture radar; random forest; Ocean engineering; TC1501-1800; Geophysics. Cosmic physics; QC801-809; Arctic; Fram Strait; Sea ice
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3170732; https://doaj.org/article/71842fd8b20d47a286bb3e7e24de3bc7

The aim of this article was to investigate the potential of polarimetric decomposition of Chinese Gaofen-3 (GF-3) C-band fully polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (PolSAR) data for Arctic sea ice classification during summer season. Five different polarimetric decomposition approaches, including the Cloude-Pottier decomposition (Cloude), the Freeman three-component decomposition (Freeman3), the Freeman three-component decomposition using the extended Bragg model (Freeman3X), the Yamaguchi three-component decomposition (Yamaguchi3), and the nonnegative eigenvalue decomposition (NNED) were analyzed using 35 scenes of GF-3 PolSAR data collected over the Fram Strait, Arctic from June 14–18, 2017. Polarimetric features extracted from these five methods were evaluated and utilized to train random forest classifiers to classify open water (calm water and rough water) and sea ice types (melted ice, unmelted ice, and deformed ice). The results show that NNED could ensure physically valid decomposed powers while the other three model-based decompositions had negative values. In terms of sea ice classification, NNED had the highest feature importance scores and achieved an overall accuracy and Kappa coefficient of about 86.18% and 0.82, respectively. Inclusion of radar incidence angle as a feature in the classifier could slightly improve the classification accuracy by about 3%. The influence of incidence angle on sea ice classification accuracy was also investigated and it was found that high incidence angles (39°–46°) were superior to low incidence angles (21°–27°) due to the overall higher accuracies.