Thermal Liability of Hyaloclastite in the Krafla Geothermal Reservoir, Iceland: The Impact of Phyllosilicates on Permeability and Rock Strength

Geothermal fields are prone to temperature fluctuations from natural hydrothermal activity, anthropogenic drilling practices, and magmatic intrusions. These fluctuations may elicit a response from the rocks in terms of their mineralogical, physical (i.e., porosity and permeability), and mechanical p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geofluids
Main Authors: Josh Weaver, Guðjón H. Eggertsson, James E. P. Utley, Paul A. Wallace, Anthony Lamur, Jackie E. Kendrick, Hugh Tuffen, Sigurður H. Markússon, Yan Lavallée
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9057193
https://doaj.org/article/6f900a9487d64905a2f4c35c8a51ad2e
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6f900a9487d64905a2f4c35c8a51ad2e
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6f900a9487d64905a2f4c35c8a51ad2e 2024-09-09T19:46:52+00:00 Thermal Liability of Hyaloclastite in the Krafla Geothermal Reservoir, Iceland: The Impact of Phyllosilicates on Permeability and Rock Strength Josh Weaver Guðjón H. Eggertsson James E. P. Utley Paul A. Wallace Anthony Lamur Jackie E. Kendrick Hugh Tuffen Sigurður H. Markússon Yan Lavallée 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9057193 https://doaj.org/article/6f900a9487d64905a2f4c35c8a51ad2e EN eng Wiley http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9057193 https://doaj.org/toc/1468-8115 https://doaj.org/toc/1468-8123 1468-8115 1468-8123 doi:10.1155/2020/9057193 https://doaj.org/article/6f900a9487d64905a2f4c35c8a51ad2e Geofluids, Vol 2020 (2020) Geology QE1-996.5 article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9057193 2024-08-05T17:48:41Z Geothermal fields are prone to temperature fluctuations from natural hydrothermal activity, anthropogenic drilling practices, and magmatic intrusions. These fluctuations may elicit a response from the rocks in terms of their mineralogical, physical (i.e., porosity and permeability), and mechanical properties. Hyaloclastites are a highly variable volcaniclastic rock predominantly formed of glass clasts that are produced during nonexplosive quench-induced fragmentation, in both subaqueous and subglacial eruptive environments. They are common in high-latitude geothermal fields as both weak, highly permeable reservoir rocks and compacted impermeable cap rocks. Basaltic glass is altered through interactions with external water into a clay-dominated matrix, termed palagonite, which acts to cement the bulk rock. The abundant, hydrous phyllosilicate minerals within the palagonite can dehydrate at elevated temperatures, potentially resulting in thermal liability of the bulk rock. Using surficial samples collected from Krafla, northeast Iceland, and a range of petrographic, mineralogical, and mechanical analyses, we find that smectite dehydration occurs at temperatures commonly experienced within geothermal fields. Dehydration events at 130, 185, and 600°C result in progressive mass loss and contraction. This evolution results in a positive correlation between treatment temperature, porosity gain, and permeability increase. Gas permeability measured at 1 MPa confining pressure shows a 3-fold increase following thermal treatment at 600°C. Furthermore, strength measurements show that brittle failure is dependent on porosity and therefore the degree of thermal treatment. Following thermal treatment at 600°C, the indirect tensile strength, uniaxial compressive strength, and triaxial compressive strength (at 5 MPa confining pressure) decrease by up to 68% (1.1 MPa), 63% (7.3 MPa), and 25% (7.9 MPa), respectively. These results are compared with hyaloclastite taken from several depths within the Krafla reservoir, through which ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Krafla ENVELOPE(-16.747,-16.747,65.713,65.713) Geofluids 2020 1 20
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Geology
QE1-996.5
spellingShingle Geology
QE1-996.5
Josh Weaver
Guðjón H. Eggertsson
James E. P. Utley
Paul A. Wallace
Anthony Lamur
Jackie E. Kendrick
Hugh Tuffen
Sigurður H. Markússon
Yan Lavallée
Thermal Liability of Hyaloclastite in the Krafla Geothermal Reservoir, Iceland: The Impact of Phyllosilicates on Permeability and Rock Strength
topic_facet Geology
QE1-996.5
description Geothermal fields are prone to temperature fluctuations from natural hydrothermal activity, anthropogenic drilling practices, and magmatic intrusions. These fluctuations may elicit a response from the rocks in terms of their mineralogical, physical (i.e., porosity and permeability), and mechanical properties. Hyaloclastites are a highly variable volcaniclastic rock predominantly formed of glass clasts that are produced during nonexplosive quench-induced fragmentation, in both subaqueous and subglacial eruptive environments. They are common in high-latitude geothermal fields as both weak, highly permeable reservoir rocks and compacted impermeable cap rocks. Basaltic glass is altered through interactions with external water into a clay-dominated matrix, termed palagonite, which acts to cement the bulk rock. The abundant, hydrous phyllosilicate minerals within the palagonite can dehydrate at elevated temperatures, potentially resulting in thermal liability of the bulk rock. Using surficial samples collected from Krafla, northeast Iceland, and a range of petrographic, mineralogical, and mechanical analyses, we find that smectite dehydration occurs at temperatures commonly experienced within geothermal fields. Dehydration events at 130, 185, and 600°C result in progressive mass loss and contraction. This evolution results in a positive correlation between treatment temperature, porosity gain, and permeability increase. Gas permeability measured at 1 MPa confining pressure shows a 3-fold increase following thermal treatment at 600°C. Furthermore, strength measurements show that brittle failure is dependent on porosity and therefore the degree of thermal treatment. Following thermal treatment at 600°C, the indirect tensile strength, uniaxial compressive strength, and triaxial compressive strength (at 5 MPa confining pressure) decrease by up to 68% (1.1 MPa), 63% (7.3 MPa), and 25% (7.9 MPa), respectively. These results are compared with hyaloclastite taken from several depths within the Krafla reservoir, through which ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Josh Weaver
Guðjón H. Eggertsson
James E. P. Utley
Paul A. Wallace
Anthony Lamur
Jackie E. Kendrick
Hugh Tuffen
Sigurður H. Markússon
Yan Lavallée
author_facet Josh Weaver
Guðjón H. Eggertsson
James E. P. Utley
Paul A. Wallace
Anthony Lamur
Jackie E. Kendrick
Hugh Tuffen
Sigurður H. Markússon
Yan Lavallée
author_sort Josh Weaver
title Thermal Liability of Hyaloclastite in the Krafla Geothermal Reservoir, Iceland: The Impact of Phyllosilicates on Permeability and Rock Strength
title_short Thermal Liability of Hyaloclastite in the Krafla Geothermal Reservoir, Iceland: The Impact of Phyllosilicates on Permeability and Rock Strength
title_full Thermal Liability of Hyaloclastite in the Krafla Geothermal Reservoir, Iceland: The Impact of Phyllosilicates on Permeability and Rock Strength
title_fullStr Thermal Liability of Hyaloclastite in the Krafla Geothermal Reservoir, Iceland: The Impact of Phyllosilicates on Permeability and Rock Strength
title_full_unstemmed Thermal Liability of Hyaloclastite in the Krafla Geothermal Reservoir, Iceland: The Impact of Phyllosilicates on Permeability and Rock Strength
title_sort thermal liability of hyaloclastite in the krafla geothermal reservoir, iceland: the impact of phyllosilicates on permeability and rock strength
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9057193
https://doaj.org/article/6f900a9487d64905a2f4c35c8a51ad2e
long_lat ENVELOPE(-16.747,-16.747,65.713,65.713)
geographic Krafla
geographic_facet Krafla
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Geofluids, Vol 2020 (2020)
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9057193
https://doaj.org/toc/1468-8115
https://doaj.org/toc/1468-8123
1468-8115
1468-8123
doi:10.1155/2020/9057193
https://doaj.org/article/6f900a9487d64905a2f4c35c8a51ad2e
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9057193
container_title Geofluids
container_volume 2020
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 20
_version_ 1809916361902653440