Comparison between different papillary recession classification systems
Background/purpose: Traditional classification systems to assess interdental papillary levels are based only on the vertical relationship among the papilla tip, contact point, and cementoenamel junction. However, the width of papilla recession (PR) is highly visible in terms of dental esthetics. A n...
Published in: | Journal of Dental Sciences |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2012.05.016 https://doaj.org/article/6f6650b1d6e546678d83fafbff8f8d34 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6f6650b1d6e546678d83fafbff8f8d34 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6f6650b1d6e546678d83fafbff8f8d34 2023-05-15T17:24:39+02:00 Comparison between different papillary recession classification systems Li-Ching Chang 2012-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2012.05.016 https://doaj.org/article/6f6650b1d6e546678d83fafbff8f8d34 EN eng Elsevier http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790212000864 https://doaj.org/toc/1991-7902 1991-7902 doi:10.1016/j.jds.2012.05.016 https://doaj.org/article/6f6650b1d6e546678d83fafbff8f8d34 Journal of Dental Sciences, Vol 7, Iss 4, Pp 373-378 (2012) classification index interdental papilla papilla recession radiography Dentistry RK1-715 article 2012 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2012.05.016 2022-12-31T02:33:24Z Background/purpose: Traditional classification systems to assess interdental papillary levels are based only on the vertical relationship among the papilla tip, contact point, and cementoenamel junction. However, the width of papilla recession (PR) is highly visible in terms of dental esthetics. A new classification system is presented to assess central PR and compare differences between the new system and existing systems. Materials and methods: Thecentral papillawas visually assessed in 450 adults using standardized periapical radiographs of the maxillary central incisors. The PR classification system presented here is based on vertical and horizontal dimensions of the PR area. Central PR was classified according to the PR system and the system of Nordland and Tarnow (TC). Results: Ninety individuals who had no PRs were classified as degree 0 according to the classification of both TC and Chang. A total of 330 individuals (73.3%) were classified as TC I (Tarnow), and 46, 89, 16, and 183 participants were classified as PR I, PR II, PR III, and PR IV (Chang). Thirty individuals were classified as TC II, and all were classified as PR IV. Conclusion: This study confirmed a significant correlation between the two existing classification methods. The proposed PR classification system characterizes open embrasures in greater detail than previous systems. Article in Journal/Newspaper Nordland Nordland Nordland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Contact Point ENVELOPE(-56.997,-56.997,-63.374,-63.374) Journal of Dental Sciences 7 4 373 378 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
classification index interdental papilla papilla recession radiography Dentistry RK1-715 |
spellingShingle |
classification index interdental papilla papilla recession radiography Dentistry RK1-715 Li-Ching Chang Comparison between different papillary recession classification systems |
topic_facet |
classification index interdental papilla papilla recession radiography Dentistry RK1-715 |
description |
Background/purpose: Traditional classification systems to assess interdental papillary levels are based only on the vertical relationship among the papilla tip, contact point, and cementoenamel junction. However, the width of papilla recession (PR) is highly visible in terms of dental esthetics. A new classification system is presented to assess central PR and compare differences between the new system and existing systems. Materials and methods: Thecentral papillawas visually assessed in 450 adults using standardized periapical radiographs of the maxillary central incisors. The PR classification system presented here is based on vertical and horizontal dimensions of the PR area. Central PR was classified according to the PR system and the system of Nordland and Tarnow (TC). Results: Ninety individuals who had no PRs were classified as degree 0 according to the classification of both TC and Chang. A total of 330 individuals (73.3%) were classified as TC I (Tarnow), and 46, 89, 16, and 183 participants were classified as PR I, PR II, PR III, and PR IV (Chang). Thirty individuals were classified as TC II, and all were classified as PR IV. Conclusion: This study confirmed a significant correlation between the two existing classification methods. The proposed PR classification system characterizes open embrasures in greater detail than previous systems. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Li-Ching Chang |
author_facet |
Li-Ching Chang |
author_sort |
Li-Ching Chang |
title |
Comparison between different papillary recession classification systems |
title_short |
Comparison between different papillary recession classification systems |
title_full |
Comparison between different papillary recession classification systems |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between different papillary recession classification systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between different papillary recession classification systems |
title_sort |
comparison between different papillary recession classification systems |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2012.05.016 https://doaj.org/article/6f6650b1d6e546678d83fafbff8f8d34 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-56.997,-56.997,-63.374,-63.374) |
geographic |
Contact Point |
geographic_facet |
Contact Point |
genre |
Nordland Nordland Nordland |
genre_facet |
Nordland Nordland Nordland |
op_source |
Journal of Dental Sciences, Vol 7, Iss 4, Pp 373-378 (2012) |
op_relation |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790212000864 https://doaj.org/toc/1991-7902 1991-7902 doi:10.1016/j.jds.2012.05.016 https://doaj.org/article/6f6650b1d6e546678d83fafbff8f8d34 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2012.05.016 |
container_title |
Journal of Dental Sciences |
container_volume |
7 |
container_issue |
4 |
container_start_page |
373 |
op_container_end_page |
378 |
_version_ |
1766115767409967104 |