Evidence on the efficacy of small unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) as a survey tool for North American terrestrial, vertebrate animals: a systematic map

Abstract Background Small unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) are replacing or supplementing occupied aircraft and ground-based surveys in animal monitoring due to improved sensors, efficiency, costs, and logistical benefits. Numerous UAS and sensors are available and have been used in various methods...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Evidence
Main Authors: Jared A. Elmore, Emma A. Schultz, Landon R. Jones, Kristine O. Evans, Sathishkumar Samiappan, Morgan B. Pfeiffer, Bradley F. Blackwell, Raymond B. Iglay
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023
Subjects:
RPA
UAV
UVS
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-022-00294-8
https://doaj.org/article/6f4d31b31d814d1e8926ed66ace66eef
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6f4d31b31d814d1e8926ed66ace66eef
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6f4d31b31d814d1e8926ed66ace66eef 2024-10-13T14:01:50+00:00 Evidence on the efficacy of small unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) as a survey tool for North American terrestrial, vertebrate animals: a systematic map Jared A. Elmore Emma A. Schultz Landon R. Jones Kristine O. Evans Sathishkumar Samiappan Morgan B. Pfeiffer Bradley F. Blackwell Raymond B. Iglay 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-022-00294-8 https://doaj.org/article/6f4d31b31d814d1e8926ed66ace66eef EN eng BMC https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-022-00294-8 https://doaj.org/toc/2047-2382 https://doaj.org/article/6f4d31b31d814d1e8926ed66ace66eef Environmental Evidence, Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp 1-17 (2023) Count Monitor RPA UAV UVS Wildlife Environmental sciences GE1-350 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-022-00294-8 2024-09-25T15:39:11Z Abstract Background Small unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) are replacing or supplementing occupied aircraft and ground-based surveys in animal monitoring due to improved sensors, efficiency, costs, and logistical benefits. Numerous UAS and sensors are available and have been used in various methods. However, justification for selection or methods used are not typically offered in published literature. Furthermore, existing reviews do not adequately cover past and current UAS applications for animal monitoring, nor their associated UAS/sensor characteristics and environmental considerations. We present a systematic map that collects and consolidates evidence pertaining to UAS monitoring of animals. Methods We investigated the current state of knowledge on UAS applications in terrestrial animal monitoring by using an accurate, comprehensive, and repeatable systematic map approach. We searched relevant peer-reviewed and grey literature, as well as dissertations and theses, using online publication databases, Google Scholar, and by request through a professional network of collaborators and publicly available websites. We used a tiered approach to article exclusion with eligible studies being those that monitor (i.e., identify, count, estimate, etc.) terrestrial vertebrate animals. Extracted metadata concerning UAS, sensors, animals, methodology, and results were recorded in Microsoft Access. We queried and catalogued evidence in the final database to produce tables, figures, and geographic maps to accompany this full narrative review, answering our primary and secondary questions. Review findings We found 5539 articles from our literature searches of which 216 were included with extracted metadata categories in our database and narrative review. Studies exhibited exponential growth over time but have levelled off between 2019 and 2021 and were primarily conducted in North America, Australia, and Antarctica. Each metadata category had major clusters and gaps, which are described in the narrative review. Conclusions ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Environmental Evidence 12 1
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Count
Monitor
RPA
UAV
UVS
Wildlife
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle Count
Monitor
RPA
UAV
UVS
Wildlife
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Jared A. Elmore
Emma A. Schultz
Landon R. Jones
Kristine O. Evans
Sathishkumar Samiappan
Morgan B. Pfeiffer
Bradley F. Blackwell
Raymond B. Iglay
Evidence on the efficacy of small unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) as a survey tool for North American terrestrial, vertebrate animals: a systematic map
topic_facet Count
Monitor
RPA
UAV
UVS
Wildlife
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
description Abstract Background Small unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) are replacing or supplementing occupied aircraft and ground-based surveys in animal monitoring due to improved sensors, efficiency, costs, and logistical benefits. Numerous UAS and sensors are available and have been used in various methods. However, justification for selection or methods used are not typically offered in published literature. Furthermore, existing reviews do not adequately cover past and current UAS applications for animal monitoring, nor their associated UAS/sensor characteristics and environmental considerations. We present a systematic map that collects and consolidates evidence pertaining to UAS monitoring of animals. Methods We investigated the current state of knowledge on UAS applications in terrestrial animal monitoring by using an accurate, comprehensive, and repeatable systematic map approach. We searched relevant peer-reviewed and grey literature, as well as dissertations and theses, using online publication databases, Google Scholar, and by request through a professional network of collaborators and publicly available websites. We used a tiered approach to article exclusion with eligible studies being those that monitor (i.e., identify, count, estimate, etc.) terrestrial vertebrate animals. Extracted metadata concerning UAS, sensors, animals, methodology, and results were recorded in Microsoft Access. We queried and catalogued evidence in the final database to produce tables, figures, and geographic maps to accompany this full narrative review, answering our primary and secondary questions. Review findings We found 5539 articles from our literature searches of which 216 were included with extracted metadata categories in our database and narrative review. Studies exhibited exponential growth over time but have levelled off between 2019 and 2021 and were primarily conducted in North America, Australia, and Antarctica. Each metadata category had major clusters and gaps, which are described in the narrative review. Conclusions ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jared A. Elmore
Emma A. Schultz
Landon R. Jones
Kristine O. Evans
Sathishkumar Samiappan
Morgan B. Pfeiffer
Bradley F. Blackwell
Raymond B. Iglay
author_facet Jared A. Elmore
Emma A. Schultz
Landon R. Jones
Kristine O. Evans
Sathishkumar Samiappan
Morgan B. Pfeiffer
Bradley F. Blackwell
Raymond B. Iglay
author_sort Jared A. Elmore
title Evidence on the efficacy of small unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) as a survey tool for North American terrestrial, vertebrate animals: a systematic map
title_short Evidence on the efficacy of small unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) as a survey tool for North American terrestrial, vertebrate animals: a systematic map
title_full Evidence on the efficacy of small unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) as a survey tool for North American terrestrial, vertebrate animals: a systematic map
title_fullStr Evidence on the efficacy of small unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) as a survey tool for North American terrestrial, vertebrate animals: a systematic map
title_full_unstemmed Evidence on the efficacy of small unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) as a survey tool for North American terrestrial, vertebrate animals: a systematic map
title_sort evidence on the efficacy of small unoccupied aircraft systems (uas) as a survey tool for north american terrestrial, vertebrate animals: a systematic map
publisher BMC
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-022-00294-8
https://doaj.org/article/6f4d31b31d814d1e8926ed66ace66eef
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source Environmental Evidence, Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp 1-17 (2023)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-022-00294-8
https://doaj.org/toc/2047-2382
https://doaj.org/article/6f4d31b31d814d1e8926ed66ace66eef
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-022-00294-8
container_title Environmental Evidence
container_volume 12
container_issue 1
_version_ 1812813129359294464