Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries

Geothermal energy has emerged as an alternative heating source that can replace fossil energy. This mature technology is already in use all over Europe, but there are significant differences in its use between European countries. One possible explanation for this phenomenon concerns societal differe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energies
Main Authors: Ellen Nordgård-Hansen, Ingvild Firman Fjellså, Tamás Medgyes, María Guðmundsdóttir, Baldur Pétursson, Maciej Miecznik, Leszek Pająk, Oto Halás, Einar Leknes, Kirsti Midttømme
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023
Subjects:
T
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186465
https://doaj.org/article/6e1e1f04c24b44aeb018a0b64feed0e3
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6e1e1f04c24b44aeb018a0b64feed0e3
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6e1e1f04c24b44aeb018a0b64feed0e3 2023-10-29T02:37:18+01:00 Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries Ellen Nordgård-Hansen Ingvild Firman Fjellså Tamás Medgyes María Guðmundsdóttir Baldur Pétursson Maciej Miecznik Leszek Pająk Oto Halás Einar Leknes Kirsti Midttømme 2023-09-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186465 https://doaj.org/article/6e1e1f04c24b44aeb018a0b64feed0e3 EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6465 https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073 doi:10.3390/en16186465 1996-1073 https://doaj.org/article/6e1e1f04c24b44aeb018a0b64feed0e3 Energies, Vol 16, Iss 6465, p 6465 (2023) geothermal energy societal embeddedness level (SEL) environment stakeholders policy regulations Technology T article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186465 2023-10-01T00:38:31Z Geothermal energy has emerged as an alternative heating source that can replace fossil energy. This mature technology is already in use all over Europe, but there are significant differences in its use between European countries. One possible explanation for this phenomenon concerns societal differences directly related to geothermal energy, the topic that is investigated in this study. The present work proposes using the societal embeddedness level (SEL) method to analyze and compare the status of non-technical factors affecting geothermal energy use in Hungary, Iceland, Norway, Poland, and Slovakia. The method considers four dimensions: environment, stakeholder involvement, policy and regulations, and markets and financial resources. Only Iceland fully covers the four dimensions by reaching all the milestones in the SEL framework. Iceland has the advantage of a long history of active use of geothermal energy for domestic use. The other countries face challenges within several of the dimensions, while the form and cause of these challenges are specific to each country. The findings illustrate that to mitigate climate change and drive the energy transition forward, both technical and societal factors related to various renewable energy sources must be assessed. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Energies 16 18 6465
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic geothermal energy
societal embeddedness level (SEL)
environment
stakeholders
policy
regulations
Technology
T
spellingShingle geothermal energy
societal embeddedness level (SEL)
environment
stakeholders
policy
regulations
Technology
T
Ellen Nordgård-Hansen
Ingvild Firman Fjellså
Tamás Medgyes
María Guðmundsdóttir
Baldur Pétursson
Maciej Miecznik
Leszek Pająk
Oto Halás
Einar Leknes
Kirsti Midttømme
Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries
topic_facet geothermal energy
societal embeddedness level (SEL)
environment
stakeholders
policy
regulations
Technology
T
description Geothermal energy has emerged as an alternative heating source that can replace fossil energy. This mature technology is already in use all over Europe, but there are significant differences in its use between European countries. One possible explanation for this phenomenon concerns societal differences directly related to geothermal energy, the topic that is investigated in this study. The present work proposes using the societal embeddedness level (SEL) method to analyze and compare the status of non-technical factors affecting geothermal energy use in Hungary, Iceland, Norway, Poland, and Slovakia. The method considers four dimensions: environment, stakeholder involvement, policy and regulations, and markets and financial resources. Only Iceland fully covers the four dimensions by reaching all the milestones in the SEL framework. Iceland has the advantage of a long history of active use of geothermal energy for domestic use. The other countries face challenges within several of the dimensions, while the form and cause of these challenges are specific to each country. The findings illustrate that to mitigate climate change and drive the energy transition forward, both technical and societal factors related to various renewable energy sources must be assessed.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ellen Nordgård-Hansen
Ingvild Firman Fjellså
Tamás Medgyes
María Guðmundsdóttir
Baldur Pétursson
Maciej Miecznik
Leszek Pająk
Oto Halás
Einar Leknes
Kirsti Midttømme
author_facet Ellen Nordgård-Hansen
Ingvild Firman Fjellså
Tamás Medgyes
María Guðmundsdóttir
Baldur Pétursson
Maciej Miecznik
Leszek Pająk
Oto Halás
Einar Leknes
Kirsti Midttømme
author_sort Ellen Nordgård-Hansen
title Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries
title_short Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries
title_full Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries
title_fullStr Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries
title_sort differences in direct geothermal energy utilization for heating and cooling in central and northern european countries
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186465
https://doaj.org/article/6e1e1f04c24b44aeb018a0b64feed0e3
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Energies, Vol 16, Iss 6465, p 6465 (2023)
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6465
https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073
doi:10.3390/en16186465
1996-1073
https://doaj.org/article/6e1e1f04c24b44aeb018a0b64feed0e3
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186465
container_title Energies
container_volume 16
container_issue 18
container_start_page 6465
_version_ 1781061871497904128