Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries
Geothermal energy has emerged as an alternative heating source that can replace fossil energy. This mature technology is already in use all over Europe, but there are significant differences in its use between European countries. One possible explanation for this phenomenon concerns societal differe...
Published in: | Energies |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186465 https://doaj.org/article/6e1e1f04c24b44aeb018a0b64feed0e3 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6e1e1f04c24b44aeb018a0b64feed0e3 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6e1e1f04c24b44aeb018a0b64feed0e3 2023-10-29T02:37:18+01:00 Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries Ellen Nordgård-Hansen Ingvild Firman Fjellså Tamás Medgyes María Guðmundsdóttir Baldur Pétursson Maciej Miecznik Leszek Pająk Oto Halás Einar Leknes Kirsti Midttømme 2023-09-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186465 https://doaj.org/article/6e1e1f04c24b44aeb018a0b64feed0e3 EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6465 https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073 doi:10.3390/en16186465 1996-1073 https://doaj.org/article/6e1e1f04c24b44aeb018a0b64feed0e3 Energies, Vol 16, Iss 6465, p 6465 (2023) geothermal energy societal embeddedness level (SEL) environment stakeholders policy regulations Technology T article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186465 2023-10-01T00:38:31Z Geothermal energy has emerged as an alternative heating source that can replace fossil energy. This mature technology is already in use all over Europe, but there are significant differences in its use between European countries. One possible explanation for this phenomenon concerns societal differences directly related to geothermal energy, the topic that is investigated in this study. The present work proposes using the societal embeddedness level (SEL) method to analyze and compare the status of non-technical factors affecting geothermal energy use in Hungary, Iceland, Norway, Poland, and Slovakia. The method considers four dimensions: environment, stakeholder involvement, policy and regulations, and markets and financial resources. Only Iceland fully covers the four dimensions by reaching all the milestones in the SEL framework. Iceland has the advantage of a long history of active use of geothermal energy for domestic use. The other countries face challenges within several of the dimensions, while the form and cause of these challenges are specific to each country. The findings illustrate that to mitigate climate change and drive the energy transition forward, both technical and societal factors related to various renewable energy sources must be assessed. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Energies 16 18 6465 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
geothermal energy societal embeddedness level (SEL) environment stakeholders policy regulations Technology T |
spellingShingle |
geothermal energy societal embeddedness level (SEL) environment stakeholders policy regulations Technology T Ellen Nordgård-Hansen Ingvild Firman Fjellså Tamás Medgyes María Guðmundsdóttir Baldur Pétursson Maciej Miecznik Leszek Pająk Oto Halás Einar Leknes Kirsti Midttømme Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries |
topic_facet |
geothermal energy societal embeddedness level (SEL) environment stakeholders policy regulations Technology T |
description |
Geothermal energy has emerged as an alternative heating source that can replace fossil energy. This mature technology is already in use all over Europe, but there are significant differences in its use between European countries. One possible explanation for this phenomenon concerns societal differences directly related to geothermal energy, the topic that is investigated in this study. The present work proposes using the societal embeddedness level (SEL) method to analyze and compare the status of non-technical factors affecting geothermal energy use in Hungary, Iceland, Norway, Poland, and Slovakia. The method considers four dimensions: environment, stakeholder involvement, policy and regulations, and markets and financial resources. Only Iceland fully covers the four dimensions by reaching all the milestones in the SEL framework. Iceland has the advantage of a long history of active use of geothermal energy for domestic use. The other countries face challenges within several of the dimensions, while the form and cause of these challenges are specific to each country. The findings illustrate that to mitigate climate change and drive the energy transition forward, both technical and societal factors related to various renewable energy sources must be assessed. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Ellen Nordgård-Hansen Ingvild Firman Fjellså Tamás Medgyes María Guðmundsdóttir Baldur Pétursson Maciej Miecznik Leszek Pająk Oto Halás Einar Leknes Kirsti Midttømme |
author_facet |
Ellen Nordgård-Hansen Ingvild Firman Fjellså Tamás Medgyes María Guðmundsdóttir Baldur Pétursson Maciej Miecznik Leszek Pająk Oto Halás Einar Leknes Kirsti Midttømme |
author_sort |
Ellen Nordgård-Hansen |
title |
Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries |
title_short |
Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries |
title_full |
Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries |
title_fullStr |
Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries |
title_sort |
differences in direct geothermal energy utilization for heating and cooling in central and northern european countries |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186465 https://doaj.org/article/6e1e1f04c24b44aeb018a0b64feed0e3 |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_source |
Energies, Vol 16, Iss 6465, p 6465 (2023) |
op_relation |
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6465 https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073 doi:10.3390/en16186465 1996-1073 https://doaj.org/article/6e1e1f04c24b44aeb018a0b64feed0e3 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186465 |
container_title |
Energies |
container_volume |
16 |
container_issue |
18 |
container_start_page |
6465 |
_version_ |
1781061871497904128 |