Efficacy and safety of therapeutic strategies for human brucellosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background Human brucellosis is a neglected, re-emerging, and endemic zoonosis in many countries. The debilitating and disabling potential of the disease is a warning about its morbidity, generating socioeconomic impact. This review aims to update the current evidence on the efficacy and safety of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Main Authors: Sarah Nascimento Silva, Gláucia Cota, Diego Mendes Xavier, Glaciele Maria de Souza, Marina Rocha Fonseca Souza, Moisés Willian Aparecido Gonçalves, Felipe Francisco Tuon, Endi Lanza Galvão
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012010
https://doaj.org/article/6dfb25c5bcf946e0b9c2c9559900c247
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6dfb25c5bcf946e0b9c2c9559900c247
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6dfb25c5bcf946e0b9c2c9559900c247 2024-09-09T19:27:52+00:00 Efficacy and safety of therapeutic strategies for human brucellosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sarah Nascimento Silva Gláucia Cota Diego Mendes Xavier Glaciele Maria de Souza Marina Rocha Fonseca Souza Moisés Willian Aparecido Gonçalves Felipe Francisco Tuon Endi Lanza Galvão 2024-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012010 https://doaj.org/article/6dfb25c5bcf946e0b9c2c9559900c247 EN eng Public Library of Science (PLoS) https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0012010&type=printable https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2727 https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2735 1935-2727 1935-2735 doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0012010 https://doaj.org/article/6dfb25c5bcf946e0b9c2c9559900c247 PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol 18, Iss 3, p e0012010 (2024) Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 article 2024 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012010 2024-08-19T14:56:40Z Background Human brucellosis is a neglected, re-emerging, and endemic zoonosis in many countries. The debilitating and disabling potential of the disease is a warning about its morbidity, generating socioeconomic impact. This review aims to update the current evidence on the efficacy and safety of therapeutic options for human brucellosis using the network meta-analysis (NMA). Methodology A systematic search was conducted in four different databases by independent reviewers to assess overall therapy failure, adverse events, and time to defervescence associated with different therapies. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating any therapeutic drug intervention were selected, excluding non-original studies or studies related to localized forms of the disease or with less than 10 participants. Data were analyzed by frequentist statistics through NMA by random effects model. The risk of bias and certainty of evidence was assessed, this review was registered at PROSPERO. Results Thirty-one (31) RCTs involving 4167 patients were included. Three networks of evidence were identified to evaluate the outcomes of interest. Triple therapy with doxycycline + streptomycin + hydroxychloroquine for 42 days (RR: 0.08; CI 95% 0.01-0.76) had a lower failure risk than the doxycycline + streptomycin regimen. Doxycycline + rifampicin had a higher risk of failure than doxycycline + streptomycin (RR: 1.96; CI 95% 1.27-3.01). No significant difference was observed between the regimens when analyzing the incidence of adverse events and time to defervescence. In general, most studies had a high risk of bias, and the results had a very low certainty of evidence. Conclusions This review confirmed the superiority of drugs already indicated for treating human brucellosis, such as the combination of doxycycline and aminoglycosides. The association of hydroxychloroquine to the dual regimen was identified as a potential strategy to prevent overall therapy failure, which is subject to confirmation in future studies. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 18 3 e0012010
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Sarah Nascimento Silva
Gláucia Cota
Diego Mendes Xavier
Glaciele Maria de Souza
Marina Rocha Fonseca Souza
Moisés Willian Aparecido Gonçalves
Felipe Francisco Tuon
Endi Lanza Galvão
Efficacy and safety of therapeutic strategies for human brucellosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
topic_facet Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
description Background Human brucellosis is a neglected, re-emerging, and endemic zoonosis in many countries. The debilitating and disabling potential of the disease is a warning about its morbidity, generating socioeconomic impact. This review aims to update the current evidence on the efficacy and safety of therapeutic options for human brucellosis using the network meta-analysis (NMA). Methodology A systematic search was conducted in four different databases by independent reviewers to assess overall therapy failure, adverse events, and time to defervescence associated with different therapies. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating any therapeutic drug intervention were selected, excluding non-original studies or studies related to localized forms of the disease or with less than 10 participants. Data were analyzed by frequentist statistics through NMA by random effects model. The risk of bias and certainty of evidence was assessed, this review was registered at PROSPERO. Results Thirty-one (31) RCTs involving 4167 patients were included. Three networks of evidence were identified to evaluate the outcomes of interest. Triple therapy with doxycycline + streptomycin + hydroxychloroquine for 42 days (RR: 0.08; CI 95% 0.01-0.76) had a lower failure risk than the doxycycline + streptomycin regimen. Doxycycline + rifampicin had a higher risk of failure than doxycycline + streptomycin (RR: 1.96; CI 95% 1.27-3.01). No significant difference was observed between the regimens when analyzing the incidence of adverse events and time to defervescence. In general, most studies had a high risk of bias, and the results had a very low certainty of evidence. Conclusions This review confirmed the superiority of drugs already indicated for treating human brucellosis, such as the combination of doxycycline and aminoglycosides. The association of hydroxychloroquine to the dual regimen was identified as a potential strategy to prevent overall therapy failure, which is subject to confirmation in future studies.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Sarah Nascimento Silva
Gláucia Cota
Diego Mendes Xavier
Glaciele Maria de Souza
Marina Rocha Fonseca Souza
Moisés Willian Aparecido Gonçalves
Felipe Francisco Tuon
Endi Lanza Galvão
author_facet Sarah Nascimento Silva
Gláucia Cota
Diego Mendes Xavier
Glaciele Maria de Souza
Marina Rocha Fonseca Souza
Moisés Willian Aparecido Gonçalves
Felipe Francisco Tuon
Endi Lanza Galvão
author_sort Sarah Nascimento Silva
title Efficacy and safety of therapeutic strategies for human brucellosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_short Efficacy and safety of therapeutic strategies for human brucellosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_full Efficacy and safety of therapeutic strategies for human brucellosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of therapeutic strategies for human brucellosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of therapeutic strategies for human brucellosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_sort efficacy and safety of therapeutic strategies for human brucellosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2024
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012010
https://doaj.org/article/6dfb25c5bcf946e0b9c2c9559900c247
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol 18, Iss 3, p e0012010 (2024)
op_relation https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0012010&type=printable
https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2727
https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2735
1935-2727
1935-2735
doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0012010
https://doaj.org/article/6dfb25c5bcf946e0b9c2c9559900c247
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012010
container_title PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
container_volume 18
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0012010
_version_ 1809897212786769920