The Nordic Balance Revisited: Differentiation and the Foreign Policy Repertoires of the Nordic States

Nordic governments frequently broadcast their ambition to do more together on the international stage. The five Nordic states (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Sweden and Norway) also share many basic goals as foreign policy actors, including a steadfast and vocal commitment to safeguarding the ‘rules-bas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Politics and Governance
Main Authors: Kristin Haugevik, Ole Jacob Sending
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3380
https://doaj.org/article/6d73b4e35a4c40789ea6b4a3e9a41590
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6d73b4e35a4c40789ea6b4a3e9a41590
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6d73b4e35a4c40789ea6b4a3e9a41590 2023-05-15T16:51:22+02:00 The Nordic Balance Revisited: Differentiation and the Foreign Policy Repertoires of the Nordic States Kristin Haugevik Ole Jacob Sending 2020-11-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3380 https://doaj.org/article/6d73b4e35a4c40789ea6b4a3e9a41590 EN eng Cogitatio https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3380 https://doaj.org/toc/2183-2463 2183-2463 doi:10.17645/pag.v8i4.3380 https://doaj.org/article/6d73b4e35a4c40789ea6b4a3e9a41590 Politics and Governance, Vol 8, Iss 4, Pp 110-119 (2020) cooperation foreign policy identity nordic region repertoires Political science (General) JA1-92 article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3380 2022-12-31T00:00:45Z Nordic governments frequently broadcast their ambition to do more together on the international stage. The five Nordic states (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Sweden and Norway) also share many basic goals as foreign policy actors, including a steadfast and vocal commitment to safeguarding the ‘rules-based international order.’ Why then, do we not see more organized Nordic foreign policy collaboration, for example in the form of a joint ‘grand strategy’ on core foreign policy issues, or in relation to great powers and international organizations? In this article, we draw on Charles Tilly’s concept of ‘repertoires’ to address the discrepancy between ambitions and developments in Nordic foreign policy cooperation, highlighting how the bundles of policy instruments—repertoires—that each Nordic state has developed over time take on an identity-defining quality. We argue that the Nordic states have invested in and become attached to their foreign policy differences, niches, and ‘brands.’ On the international scene, and especially when interacting with significant other states, they tend not only to stick to what they know how to do and are accustomed to doing but also to promote their national rather than their Nordic profile. While Nordic cooperation forms part of all the five states’ foreign policy repertoire in specific policy areas, these are marginal compared to the distinctive repertoires on which each Nordic state rely in relation to more powerful states. It is therefore unlikely that we will see a ‘common order’ among the Nordic states in the foreign policy domain in the near future. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Norway Politics and Governance 8 4 110 119
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic cooperation
foreign policy
identity
nordic region
repertoires
Political science (General)
JA1-92
spellingShingle cooperation
foreign policy
identity
nordic region
repertoires
Political science (General)
JA1-92
Kristin Haugevik
Ole Jacob Sending
The Nordic Balance Revisited: Differentiation and the Foreign Policy Repertoires of the Nordic States
topic_facet cooperation
foreign policy
identity
nordic region
repertoires
Political science (General)
JA1-92
description Nordic governments frequently broadcast their ambition to do more together on the international stage. The five Nordic states (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Sweden and Norway) also share many basic goals as foreign policy actors, including a steadfast and vocal commitment to safeguarding the ‘rules-based international order.’ Why then, do we not see more organized Nordic foreign policy collaboration, for example in the form of a joint ‘grand strategy’ on core foreign policy issues, or in relation to great powers and international organizations? In this article, we draw on Charles Tilly’s concept of ‘repertoires’ to address the discrepancy between ambitions and developments in Nordic foreign policy cooperation, highlighting how the bundles of policy instruments—repertoires—that each Nordic state has developed over time take on an identity-defining quality. We argue that the Nordic states have invested in and become attached to their foreign policy differences, niches, and ‘brands.’ On the international scene, and especially when interacting with significant other states, they tend not only to stick to what they know how to do and are accustomed to doing but also to promote their national rather than their Nordic profile. While Nordic cooperation forms part of all the five states’ foreign policy repertoire in specific policy areas, these are marginal compared to the distinctive repertoires on which each Nordic state rely in relation to more powerful states. It is therefore unlikely that we will see a ‘common order’ among the Nordic states in the foreign policy domain in the near future.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kristin Haugevik
Ole Jacob Sending
author_facet Kristin Haugevik
Ole Jacob Sending
author_sort Kristin Haugevik
title The Nordic Balance Revisited: Differentiation and the Foreign Policy Repertoires of the Nordic States
title_short The Nordic Balance Revisited: Differentiation and the Foreign Policy Repertoires of the Nordic States
title_full The Nordic Balance Revisited: Differentiation and the Foreign Policy Repertoires of the Nordic States
title_fullStr The Nordic Balance Revisited: Differentiation and the Foreign Policy Repertoires of the Nordic States
title_full_unstemmed The Nordic Balance Revisited: Differentiation and the Foreign Policy Repertoires of the Nordic States
title_sort nordic balance revisited: differentiation and the foreign policy repertoires of the nordic states
publisher Cogitatio
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3380
https://doaj.org/article/6d73b4e35a4c40789ea6b4a3e9a41590
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Politics and Governance, Vol 8, Iss 4, Pp 110-119 (2020)
op_relation https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3380
https://doaj.org/toc/2183-2463
2183-2463
doi:10.17645/pag.v8i4.3380
https://doaj.org/article/6d73b4e35a4c40789ea6b4a3e9a41590
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3380
container_title Politics and Governance
container_volume 8
container_issue 4
container_start_page 110
op_container_end_page 119
_version_ 1766041477226430464