Tipping point in North American Arctic-Boreal carbon sink persists in new generation Earth system models despite reduced uncertainty

Estimating the impacts of climate change on the global carbon cycle relies on projections from Earth system models (ESMs). While ESMs currently project large warming in the high northern latitudes, the magnitude and sign of the future carbon balance of Arctic-Boreal ecosystems are highly uncertain....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Research Letters
Main Authors: Renato K Braghiere, Joshua B Fisher, Kimberley R Miner, Charles E Miller, John R Worden, David S Schimel, Christian Frankenberg
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2023
Subjects:
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acb226
https://doaj.org/article/6d0aef84ba5c48d88e0cc647cff17675
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6d0aef84ba5c48d88e0cc647cff17675
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6d0aef84ba5c48d88e0cc647cff17675 2023-09-05T13:16:58+02:00 Tipping point in North American Arctic-Boreal carbon sink persists in new generation Earth system models despite reduced uncertainty Renato K Braghiere Joshua B Fisher Kimberley R Miner Charles E Miller John R Worden David S Schimel Christian Frankenberg 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acb226 https://doaj.org/article/6d0aef84ba5c48d88e0cc647cff17675 EN eng IOP Publishing https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acb226 https://doaj.org/toc/1748-9326 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/acb226 1748-9326 https://doaj.org/article/6d0aef84ba5c48d88e0cc647cff17675 Environmental Research Letters, Vol 18, Iss 2, p 025008 (2023) NASA ABoVE CMIP5 CMIP6 tipping point carbon cycle soil carbon Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TD1-1066 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Science Q Physics QC1-999 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acb226 2023-08-13T00:36:48Z Estimating the impacts of climate change on the global carbon cycle relies on projections from Earth system models (ESMs). While ESMs currently project large warming in the high northern latitudes, the magnitude and sign of the future carbon balance of Arctic-Boreal ecosystems are highly uncertain. The new generation of increased complexity ESMs in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Sixth Assessment Report (IPCC AR6) is intended to improve future climate projections. Here, we benchmark the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) 5 and 6 (8 CMIP5 members and 12 CMIP6 members) with the International Land Model Benchmarking (ILAMB) tool over the region of NASA’s Arctic-Boreal vulnerability experiment (ABoVE) in North America. We show that the projected average net biome production (NBP) in 2100 from CMIP6 is higher than that from CMIP5 in the ABoVE domain, despite the model spread being slightly narrower. Overall, CMIP6 shows better agreement with contemporary observed carbon cycle variables (photosynthesis, respiration, biomass) than CMIP5, except for soil carbon and turnover time. Although both CMIP ensemble members project the ABoVE domain will remain a carbon sink by the end of the 21st century, the sink strength in CMIP6 increases with CO _2 emissions. CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensembles indicate a tipping point defined here as a negative inflection point in the NBP curve by 2050–2080 independently of the shared socioeconomic pathway (SSP) for CMIP6 or representative concentration pathway (RCP) for CMIP5. The model ensembles therefore suggest that, if the carbon sink strength keeps declining throughout the 21st century, the Arctic-Boreal ecosystems in North America may become a carbon source over the next century. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Climate change Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Environmental Research Letters 18 2 025008
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic NASA ABoVE
CMIP5
CMIP6
tipping point
carbon cycle
soil carbon
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
spellingShingle NASA ABoVE
CMIP5
CMIP6
tipping point
carbon cycle
soil carbon
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
Renato K Braghiere
Joshua B Fisher
Kimberley R Miner
Charles E Miller
John R Worden
David S Schimel
Christian Frankenberg
Tipping point in North American Arctic-Boreal carbon sink persists in new generation Earth system models despite reduced uncertainty
topic_facet NASA ABoVE
CMIP5
CMIP6
tipping point
carbon cycle
soil carbon
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
description Estimating the impacts of climate change on the global carbon cycle relies on projections from Earth system models (ESMs). While ESMs currently project large warming in the high northern latitudes, the magnitude and sign of the future carbon balance of Arctic-Boreal ecosystems are highly uncertain. The new generation of increased complexity ESMs in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Sixth Assessment Report (IPCC AR6) is intended to improve future climate projections. Here, we benchmark the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) 5 and 6 (8 CMIP5 members and 12 CMIP6 members) with the International Land Model Benchmarking (ILAMB) tool over the region of NASA’s Arctic-Boreal vulnerability experiment (ABoVE) in North America. We show that the projected average net biome production (NBP) in 2100 from CMIP6 is higher than that from CMIP5 in the ABoVE domain, despite the model spread being slightly narrower. Overall, CMIP6 shows better agreement with contemporary observed carbon cycle variables (photosynthesis, respiration, biomass) than CMIP5, except for soil carbon and turnover time. Although both CMIP ensemble members project the ABoVE domain will remain a carbon sink by the end of the 21st century, the sink strength in CMIP6 increases with CO _2 emissions. CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensembles indicate a tipping point defined here as a negative inflection point in the NBP curve by 2050–2080 independently of the shared socioeconomic pathway (SSP) for CMIP6 or representative concentration pathway (RCP) for CMIP5. The model ensembles therefore suggest that, if the carbon sink strength keeps declining throughout the 21st century, the Arctic-Boreal ecosystems in North America may become a carbon source over the next century.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Renato K Braghiere
Joshua B Fisher
Kimberley R Miner
Charles E Miller
John R Worden
David S Schimel
Christian Frankenberg
author_facet Renato K Braghiere
Joshua B Fisher
Kimberley R Miner
Charles E Miller
John R Worden
David S Schimel
Christian Frankenberg
author_sort Renato K Braghiere
title Tipping point in North American Arctic-Boreal carbon sink persists in new generation Earth system models despite reduced uncertainty
title_short Tipping point in North American Arctic-Boreal carbon sink persists in new generation Earth system models despite reduced uncertainty
title_full Tipping point in North American Arctic-Boreal carbon sink persists in new generation Earth system models despite reduced uncertainty
title_fullStr Tipping point in North American Arctic-Boreal carbon sink persists in new generation Earth system models despite reduced uncertainty
title_full_unstemmed Tipping point in North American Arctic-Boreal carbon sink persists in new generation Earth system models despite reduced uncertainty
title_sort tipping point in north american arctic-boreal carbon sink persists in new generation earth system models despite reduced uncertainty
publisher IOP Publishing
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acb226
https://doaj.org/article/6d0aef84ba5c48d88e0cc647cff17675
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Climate change
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
op_source Environmental Research Letters, Vol 18, Iss 2, p 025008 (2023)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acb226
https://doaj.org/toc/1748-9326
doi:10.1088/1748-9326/acb226
1748-9326
https://doaj.org/article/6d0aef84ba5c48d88e0cc647cff17675
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acb226
container_title Environmental Research Letters
container_volume 18
container_issue 2
container_start_page 025008
_version_ 1776198346834182144