Discriminant Analysis of the Solar Input on the Danube’s Discharge in the Lower Basin

• Published in: Atmosphere
• Main Authors: Constantin Mares, Ileana Mares, Venera Dobrica, Crisan Demetrescu
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2023
• Subjects: NAO; GBO; Palmer index; Schwabe and Hale solar cycles; Danube discharge; filter wavelet transform; Meteorology. Climatology; QC851-999; Greenland; Hale; Nash; Sutcliffe; North Atlantic; North Atlantic oscillation
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14081281; https://doaj.org/article/6c6b88e800df41748ad9b3852ea3fba3

This paper presents the extent to which the combination of extra-atmospheric and hydroclimatic factors can be deciphered to record their contribution to the evolution and forecasting of the Danube discharge (Q) in the lower basin. A combination of methods such as wavelet filtering and deep learning (DL) constitutes the basic method for discriminating the external factors (solar activity through Wolf numbers) that significantly contribute to the evolution and prediction of the lower Danube discharge. An ensemble of some of the most important factors, namely, those representing the atmospheric components, i.e., the Greenland-Balkan Oscillation Index (GBOI) and the North Atlantic Oscillation Index (NAOI); the hydroclimatic indicator, the Palmer Hydrological Drought Index (PHDI); and the extra-atmospheric factor, constitutes the set of predictors by means of which the predictand, Q, in the summer season, is estimated. The external factor has to be discriminated in the Schwabe and Hale spectra to make its convolutional contribution to the Q estimation in the lower Danube basin. An interesting finding is that adding two solar predictors (associated with the Schwabe and Hale cycles) to the terrestrial ones give a better estimation of the Danube discharge in summer, compared to using only terrestrial predictors. Based on the Nash–Sutcliffe (NS) index, a measure of performance given by the extreme learning machine (ELM), it is shown that, in association with certain terrestrial predictors, the contribution of the Hale cycle is more significant than the contribution of the Schwabe cycle to the estimation of the Danube discharge in the lower basin.