A randomized, open-label clinical trial comparing the long-term effects of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for mucosal leishmaniasis
Abstract INTRODUCTION: The treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) is difficult due to the toxicity and route of administration of standard drugs. Miltefosine is an oral agent used for leishmaniasis treatment; however, no data exist regarding its use for ML in Brazil. In this study, we aimed to eval...
Published in: | Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0292-2018 https://doaj.org/article/6abf7430f70d4e889c1135af9922ead8 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6abf7430f70d4e889c1135af9922ead8 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6abf7430f70d4e889c1135af9922ead8 2023-05-15T15:13:24+02:00 A randomized, open-label clinical trial comparing the long-term effects of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for mucosal leishmaniasis Raimunda Nonata Ribeiro Sampaio Juliana Saboia Fontenele e Silva Carmen Dea Ribeiro de Paula Cláudia Porto Jorgeth de Oliveira Carneiro da Motta Ledice Inacia de Araujo Pereira Sofia Sales Martins Daniel Holanda Barroso Gustavo Subtil Magalhães Freire Ciro Martins Gomes 2019-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0292-2018 https://doaj.org/article/6abf7430f70d4e889c1135af9922ead8 EN eng Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT) http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822019000100315&lng=en&tlng=en https://doaj.org/toc/1678-9849 1678-9849 doi:10.1590/0037-8682-0292-2018 https://doaj.org/article/6abf7430f70d4e889c1135af9922ead8 Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, Vol 52, Iss 0 (2019) Leishmaniasis Mucosal Leishmaniasis Controlled Clinical Trial Pentavalent antimonial Therapeutics Miltefosine Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0292-2018 2022-12-30T23:18:11Z Abstract INTRODUCTION: The treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) is difficult due to the toxicity and route of administration of standard drugs. Miltefosine is an oral agent used for leishmaniasis treatment; however, no data exist regarding its use for ML in Brazil. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of miltefosine for ML treatment compared to that of pentavalent antimonial in a pilot study. METHODS: We performed a randomized clinical trial with two parallel groups. The tested intervention consisted of miltefosine 1.3-2 mg/kg/day (two capsules) for 28 days or intravenous 20 mg SbV/kg/day of meglumine antimoniate (N-MA) for 30 days. The final endpoint was defined as complete healing of the lesion four years after treatment. We also analyzed an early endpoint at 90 days after treatment. RESULTS: Forty patients were included in this study: each experimental group comprised 20 patients. Applying a multivariate model in an intention-to-treat analysis, we observed that patients treated with miltefosine had a cure probability 2.08 times greater (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-4.18) than those treated with N-MA at 90 days after treatment. At the final endpoint, we observed no differences in cure probability between miltefosine and N-MA (relative risk = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.33-1.32). With respect to adverse reactions, significant differences between groups were related to gastrointestinal effects, which were more frequent in the miltefosine group. CONCLUSIONS: Miltefosine may be an interesting alternative for treating ML because of its oral administration and cure rate after long-term follow-up. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 52 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
Leishmaniasis Mucosal Leishmaniasis Controlled Clinical Trial Pentavalent antimonial Therapeutics Miltefosine Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 |
spellingShingle |
Leishmaniasis Mucosal Leishmaniasis Controlled Clinical Trial Pentavalent antimonial Therapeutics Miltefosine Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Raimunda Nonata Ribeiro Sampaio Juliana Saboia Fontenele e Silva Carmen Dea Ribeiro de Paula Cláudia Porto Jorgeth de Oliveira Carneiro da Motta Ledice Inacia de Araujo Pereira Sofia Sales Martins Daniel Holanda Barroso Gustavo Subtil Magalhães Freire Ciro Martins Gomes A randomized, open-label clinical trial comparing the long-term effects of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for mucosal leishmaniasis |
topic_facet |
Leishmaniasis Mucosal Leishmaniasis Controlled Clinical Trial Pentavalent antimonial Therapeutics Miltefosine Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 |
description |
Abstract INTRODUCTION: The treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) is difficult due to the toxicity and route of administration of standard drugs. Miltefosine is an oral agent used for leishmaniasis treatment; however, no data exist regarding its use for ML in Brazil. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of miltefosine for ML treatment compared to that of pentavalent antimonial in a pilot study. METHODS: We performed a randomized clinical trial with two parallel groups. The tested intervention consisted of miltefosine 1.3-2 mg/kg/day (two capsules) for 28 days or intravenous 20 mg SbV/kg/day of meglumine antimoniate (N-MA) for 30 days. The final endpoint was defined as complete healing of the lesion four years after treatment. We also analyzed an early endpoint at 90 days after treatment. RESULTS: Forty patients were included in this study: each experimental group comprised 20 patients. Applying a multivariate model in an intention-to-treat analysis, we observed that patients treated with miltefosine had a cure probability 2.08 times greater (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-4.18) than those treated with N-MA at 90 days after treatment. At the final endpoint, we observed no differences in cure probability between miltefosine and N-MA (relative risk = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.33-1.32). With respect to adverse reactions, significant differences between groups were related to gastrointestinal effects, which were more frequent in the miltefosine group. CONCLUSIONS: Miltefosine may be an interesting alternative for treating ML because of its oral administration and cure rate after long-term follow-up. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Raimunda Nonata Ribeiro Sampaio Juliana Saboia Fontenele e Silva Carmen Dea Ribeiro de Paula Cláudia Porto Jorgeth de Oliveira Carneiro da Motta Ledice Inacia de Araujo Pereira Sofia Sales Martins Daniel Holanda Barroso Gustavo Subtil Magalhães Freire Ciro Martins Gomes |
author_facet |
Raimunda Nonata Ribeiro Sampaio Juliana Saboia Fontenele e Silva Carmen Dea Ribeiro de Paula Cláudia Porto Jorgeth de Oliveira Carneiro da Motta Ledice Inacia de Araujo Pereira Sofia Sales Martins Daniel Holanda Barroso Gustavo Subtil Magalhães Freire Ciro Martins Gomes |
author_sort |
Raimunda Nonata Ribeiro Sampaio |
title |
A randomized, open-label clinical trial comparing the long-term effects of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for mucosal leishmaniasis |
title_short |
A randomized, open-label clinical trial comparing the long-term effects of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for mucosal leishmaniasis |
title_full |
A randomized, open-label clinical trial comparing the long-term effects of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for mucosal leishmaniasis |
title_fullStr |
A randomized, open-label clinical trial comparing the long-term effects of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for mucosal leishmaniasis |
title_full_unstemmed |
A randomized, open-label clinical trial comparing the long-term effects of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for mucosal leishmaniasis |
title_sort |
randomized, open-label clinical trial comparing the long-term effects of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for mucosal leishmaniasis |
publisher |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT) |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0292-2018 https://doaj.org/article/6abf7430f70d4e889c1135af9922ead8 |
geographic |
Arctic |
geographic_facet |
Arctic |
genre |
Arctic |
genre_facet |
Arctic |
op_source |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, Vol 52, Iss 0 (2019) |
op_relation |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822019000100315&lng=en&tlng=en https://doaj.org/toc/1678-9849 1678-9849 doi:10.1590/0037-8682-0292-2018 https://doaj.org/article/6abf7430f70d4e889c1135af9922ead8 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0292-2018 |
container_title |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
container_volume |
52 |
_version_ |
1766343963039498240 |