Epibiotic Communities of Common Crab Species in the Coastal Barents Sea: Biodiversity and Infestation Patterns

Crabs are important ecosystem engineers in marine habitats worldwide. Based on long-term data, we analyzed the species composition and infestation indices of epibionts and symbionts colonizing the great spider crab, Hyas araneus , and two lithodid crabs—the northern stone crab, Lithodes maja , and t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diversity
Main Authors: Alexander G. Dvoretsky, Vladimir G. Dvoretsky
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/d14010006
https://doaj.org/article/6aad3d91b5a34538a148df0ec20464dc
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6aad3d91b5a34538a148df0ec20464dc
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:6aad3d91b5a34538a148df0ec20464dc 2023-05-15T15:38:30+02:00 Epibiotic Communities of Common Crab Species in the Coastal Barents Sea: Biodiversity and Infestation Patterns Alexander G. Dvoretsky Vladimir G. Dvoretsky 2021-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/d14010006 https://doaj.org/article/6aad3d91b5a34538a148df0ec20464dc EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/14/1/6 https://doaj.org/toc/1424-2818 doi:10.3390/d14010006 1424-2818 https://doaj.org/article/6aad3d91b5a34538a148df0ec20464dc Diversity, Vol 14, Iss 6, p 6 (2021) Barents Sea epibionts symbionts Hyas araneus Paralithodes camtschaticus Lithodes maja Biology (General) QH301-705.5 article 2021 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/d14010006 2022-12-30T19:58:34Z Crabs are important ecosystem engineers in marine habitats worldwide. Based on long-term data, we analyzed the species composition and infestation indices of epibionts and symbionts colonizing the great spider crab, Hyas araneus , and two lithodid crabs—the northern stone crab, Lithodes maja , and the red king crab, Paralithodes camtschaticus —in the coastal zone of the Barents Sea. The epibiotic communities found on great spider crabs were closer to northern stone crabs (33%) compared to red king crabs (25%). The prevalence of mobile symbionts (amphipods, Ischyrocerus , and polychaetes, Harmothoe ) and common epibionts, such as barnacles and hydrozoans, was low on great spider crabs and high on the body and in the gills of lithodid crabs. Epiphytes were abundant on great spider crabs but not present on both species of lithodid crabs. Egg symbionts found on H. araneus and P. camtschaticus do not affect their local populations. Differences in the fouling communities found on the three crab species are associated with host size range, surface properties of their carapaces, and behavior patterns. Article in Journal/Newspaper Barents Sea Lithodes maja Paralithodes camtschaticus Red king crab Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Barents Sea Diversity 14 1 6
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Barents Sea
epibionts
symbionts
Hyas araneus
Paralithodes camtschaticus
Lithodes maja
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle Barents Sea
epibionts
symbionts
Hyas araneus
Paralithodes camtschaticus
Lithodes maja
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Alexander G. Dvoretsky
Vladimir G. Dvoretsky
Epibiotic Communities of Common Crab Species in the Coastal Barents Sea: Biodiversity and Infestation Patterns
topic_facet Barents Sea
epibionts
symbionts
Hyas araneus
Paralithodes camtschaticus
Lithodes maja
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
description Crabs are important ecosystem engineers in marine habitats worldwide. Based on long-term data, we analyzed the species composition and infestation indices of epibionts and symbionts colonizing the great spider crab, Hyas araneus , and two lithodid crabs—the northern stone crab, Lithodes maja , and the red king crab, Paralithodes camtschaticus —in the coastal zone of the Barents Sea. The epibiotic communities found on great spider crabs were closer to northern stone crabs (33%) compared to red king crabs (25%). The prevalence of mobile symbionts (amphipods, Ischyrocerus , and polychaetes, Harmothoe ) and common epibionts, such as barnacles and hydrozoans, was low on great spider crabs and high on the body and in the gills of lithodid crabs. Epiphytes were abundant on great spider crabs but not present on both species of lithodid crabs. Egg symbionts found on H. araneus and P. camtschaticus do not affect their local populations. Differences in the fouling communities found on the three crab species are associated with host size range, surface properties of their carapaces, and behavior patterns.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Alexander G. Dvoretsky
Vladimir G. Dvoretsky
author_facet Alexander G. Dvoretsky
Vladimir G. Dvoretsky
author_sort Alexander G. Dvoretsky
title Epibiotic Communities of Common Crab Species in the Coastal Barents Sea: Biodiversity and Infestation Patterns
title_short Epibiotic Communities of Common Crab Species in the Coastal Barents Sea: Biodiversity and Infestation Patterns
title_full Epibiotic Communities of Common Crab Species in the Coastal Barents Sea: Biodiversity and Infestation Patterns
title_fullStr Epibiotic Communities of Common Crab Species in the Coastal Barents Sea: Biodiversity and Infestation Patterns
title_full_unstemmed Epibiotic Communities of Common Crab Species in the Coastal Barents Sea: Biodiversity and Infestation Patterns
title_sort epibiotic communities of common crab species in the coastal barents sea: biodiversity and infestation patterns
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.3390/d14010006
https://doaj.org/article/6aad3d91b5a34538a148df0ec20464dc
geographic Barents Sea
geographic_facet Barents Sea
genre Barents Sea
Lithodes maja
Paralithodes camtschaticus
Red king crab
genre_facet Barents Sea
Lithodes maja
Paralithodes camtschaticus
Red king crab
op_source Diversity, Vol 14, Iss 6, p 6 (2021)
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/14/1/6
https://doaj.org/toc/1424-2818
doi:10.3390/d14010006
1424-2818
https://doaj.org/article/6aad3d91b5a34538a148df0ec20464dc
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/d14010006
container_title Diversity
container_volume 14
container_issue 1
container_start_page 6
_version_ 1766369461212807168